Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Would mtDNA be more useful in tracing surnames

  1. #1
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassThree Friends1 year registered5000 Experience Points
    Wheal's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-09-17
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    307
    Points
    6,713
    Level
    24
    Points: 6,713, Level: 24
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 337
    Overall activity: 22.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    Pat-U106-H-e1a4b2a
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H5a1b

    Ethnic group
    a true mutt
    Country: USA - Illinois



    Would mtDNA be more useful in tracing surnames



    As a genealogy researcher and genetics newbie with questions, I wonder if as a society, children should inherit the mother's last name, and surname projects should be based on those names.

    My reasoning is that mtDNA is passed from mother to child ending when the male child marries or there is no female offspring. The use of YDNA is ONLY useful for tracking the male line. If surnames were from the mother, they would continue upward to infinity for both male and female.

    Please forgive me if this observation has already been made, but I was unable to find it. And it may very well be naive, but please attribute that to my basic education in this field. As always comments are welcome and will most definitely enrich my understanding.

  2. #2
    Regular Member Achievements:
    7 days registered100 Experience Points

    Join Date
    24-10-17
    Posts
    23
    Points
    109
    Level
    1
    Points: 109, Level: 1
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 41
    Overall activity: 44.0%


    Country: France



    1 members found this post helpful.
    Unique mtDNA haplogroups [or markers] are already useful even if using paternal surnames. The Acadians & the Lejuene descendants for example. Certain haplogroups and/or markers that could be used to link familial relationships together regardless of surnames.

    Some people put too much merit to paternal Y DNA and markers but that's likely because they come from a patriarchal society & thus trained to think the male line matters but female line not so much.

    Shame really as the male line can be, at times & in some ways, irrelevant. A handful of surnames, for example, originated as matriarchal. There have also been practices, among social classes & cultures, where the man (of the lesser social class or because there are no male heirs to carry on the name) took on his wife's surname. I have seen people on forums trying to figure out why they have a different haplogroup than X family name & they automatically blame an unfaithful wife, an NPE event, etc. Other possibilities rarely cross their mind.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassThree Friends1 year registered5000 Experience Points
    Wheal's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-09-17
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    307
    Points
    6,713
    Level
    24
    Points: 6,713, Level: 24
    Level completed: 33%, Points required for next Level: 337
    Overall activity: 22.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    Pat-U106-H-e1a4b2a
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H5a1b

    Ethnic group
    a true mutt
    Country: USA - Illinois



    Yes, and then the NPE could be more easily discovered (in male children of course) because the surname would have been the mothers name.

    I have an Acadian grandfather who gave up his surname and took his 'title' as his surname when he became Americanized. Mostly because he was called that name as if it was a surname during the revolutionary period.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •