Jovialis
Advisor
- Messages
- 9,276
- Reaction score
- 5,843
- Points
- 113
- Ethnic group
- Italian
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R-PF7566 (R-Y227216)
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H6a1b7
The holidays are a time for making memories, but in many households, the holidays mean rushing to snag the must-have fad item, toy or tech gizmo on their child’s wish list.
Good news for parents who dread long lines and cranky crowds at the mall: A new study from the University of Toledo in Ohio suggests “an abundance of toys present reduced quality of toddlers’ play.” Having fewer toys can lead a young child to focus and engage in more creative, imaginative play. The study, “The influence of the number of toys in the environment on toddlers’ play” to be published in Infant Behavior and Development next month, explains that fewer toys result in healthier play, and ultimately deeper cognitive development.
Researchers observed 36 toddler subjects between the ages of 18 and 30 months in free-play sessions. The toddlers were given either four toys or 16 toys. “There was a significant difference in the quality of toddlers’ play between the two toy conditions. As measured by sustained play and variety of manners of play, toddlers had a greater quality of play in the Four Toy condition compared to the Sixteen Toy condition,” the study reports. Essentially, when given a few toys, the toddlers played with toys in more varied ways and for longer periods of time.
The study echoes several experts in recent years who’ve advocated for streamlined, or even toy-free, play areas for young children. In his book Clutterfree with Kids, Joshua Becker describes too many toys as a distraction from development. “Imagine the impact that hundreds of toys in our homes may be having on our kids,” he writes in response to the University of Toledo findings.
Alexia Metz, one of the researchers in the Toledo University study, notes that all the participants played under both conditions (four and 16 toys) — on different days & in random order — so that the difference reflects the change in the environment and controls to some extent for variability among children. When the children were given 16 toys, Metz and and her colleagues were able to confirm the distraction and disadvantage: “The results of the present study suggest that an abundance of toys may create such a distraction. With fewer toys present [referring to the four toy group], participants engaged in longer epochs of play.”
The children with four toys exhibited one-and-a-half times more interactions with the toys indicating that young children “are more likely to play in more sophisticated, advanced ways with fewer toys present,” according to the study. This increased involvement with a toy has positive implications for many facets of development including imaginative and pretend play, self-expression, physical skills including fine motor coordination, and problem-solving.
This isn’t to say that parents should toss toys from their home, or leave them off their shopping lists altogether. If you are, however, bending over backward or spending more than you would like on gifts for your children, particularly the very young ones, it may be worth pausing to ask yourself: Does my child really need this item? Will it enrich her playtime—or simply be used for a week or two and then ignored?
No doubt you’ve heard, “My kids have so many toys and they don’t play with them.” You probably have said this yourself.
Memories more precious than presents
As you finish up your holiday shopping, consider creating bonding rituals and traditions for children to look back on and cherish instead of another toy or electronic gadget. Have an annual movie date, a yearly cookie bake-in, or prepare a holiday meal together.
Research backs up the notion that parents should invest in activities over material goods. Thomas Gilovich, a psychology researcher at Cornell University, found that people look back on experiences with more satisfaction than they do on their material purchases. He “discovered that people thinking about impending experiential purchases, such as ski passes or concert tickets, have higher levels of happiness than those who anticipate spending money on things.”
Elect to spend money on events—a winter trip, attending a holiday ballet or show, or going to a special restaurant—or embark on free activities such as walking or driving around to see houses adorned in lights to make the season less about presents and more about holiday cheer.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/blo...derscores-why-fewer-toys-is-the-better-option
I agree with this article, too many toys would probably be too distracting for a child. Making due with what you have will probably lead to a greater appreciation. It will force children to use their imagination more, and get greater enjoyment out the fewer amount of toys. Perhaps too many toys would also lead them to being spoiled, and grow up to be wasteful.
When I was a child, I did have toys, but I was more interested in drawing, puzzles, building houses out of cards/blocks, creating stuff with clay, and especially playing with my imagination. I used to spend a lot of time at my grandparents’ house, while my mom and dad went to work. They had a large property, and I would roam around, and play outside often. My aunt and uncle who lived there, who were teenagers then, would also spend a lot of time with me. They would talk to me about interesting subjects, like history and science. They would also buy me books about those topics as well. My aunt and uncle were the ones that usually bought me toys for Christmas and my birthday too. I think it is important to try to speak to children like adults, and to foster interest in higher-order subjects.