Oldest Human Fossil Outside Africa Discovered

Jovialis

Advisor
Messages
9,313
Reaction score
5,878
Points
113
Ethnic group
Italian
Y-DNA haplogroup
R-PF7566 (R-Y227216)
mtDNA haplogroup
H6a1b7
Part of an upper jaw found in Israel reveals that our species began making forays out of Africa more than 50,000 years earlier than thought.

Part of an upper jaw with teeth found in Israel shows that modern humans ventured out of Africa much earlier than previously thought. The find adds to evidence that our species was overlapping with human relatives such as Neanderthals in the crossroads of the Levant for longer than previously realized.

Until recently, the fossil record suggested that our species, Homo sapiens,first appeared in East Africa around 200,000 years ago. While a larger wave of migration didn’t leave the continent until 50,000 to 60,000 years ago, small numbers of modern humans made forays outside of Africa as far back as 120,000 years ago, based on the known fossils. (Explore a map of human migration.)


Then, last June, research on fossils from a site called Jebel Irhoud in Morocco turned conventional wisdom on its head: Those modern-looking humans are up to 350,000 years old, scientists discovered, pushing back the early origins of our species.


The new Middle Eastern discovery, detailed today in Science, complements the Moroccan find by showing that Homo sapiens were also taking initial steps into Eurasia much earlier—around 180,000 years ago.


“This is an exciting discovery that pushes the timing of modern humans leaving Africa back quite a bit,” says Darren Curnoe, an expert on human origins at the University of New South Wales in Sydney, Australia.

“Together with the discovery last year of the earliest modern humans in Africa, our views about our origins are beginning to change very rapidly, after decades of near scientific stagnation.”

EXHAUSTIVE DATING
The upper jaw fossil was discovered in 2002 during an ongoing archaeological excavation at a site called Misliya, found on Mount Carmel in northern Israel. The site was once a rock shelter frequented by various prehistoric human species over many hundreds of thousands of years.

“Humans like to live in open rock shelters so that they can see if there’s danger or prey moving by, but also to stay dry. It was one of these terraces where they could overlook the landscape in front of them,” says study co-author Rainer Grün, director of the Australian Research Centre for Human Evolution at Griffith University in Queensland.

Researchers carried out a detailed analysis to confirm that the shape of the teeth and jaw are those of a modern human and not a Neanderthal, says Grün. (Find out how Neanderthal genes might be affecting your health.)

Though the fossil was found early on during the excavation, it was not dated until 2014/2015. The initial results were so surprising that the team decided to corroborate them, ultimately using four independent dating methods on the dentine of the teeth, the tooth enamel, sediment attached to the jaw, and stone found beside the fossil.

The methods together yielded an estimated age of 177,000 to 194,000 years, reports the team, led by paleoanthropologist Israel Hershkovitz at Tel Aviv University.

This age range “fits very well in the model that’s now emerging of a very ancient history of our species, much older than we have thought,” says Jean-Jacques Hublin of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who led the team that made the 2017 Jebel Irhoud find.

“The story of the ‘out of Africa’ movement of our species is more complicated that we previously thought.”

WITH TOOLS, TOO


It’s still unclear whether this was the earliest incursion of Homo sapiensinto Eurasia, how far east they went, and why none of the early forays before about 50,000 years ago turned into a bigger wave of migration, Hublin adds.

Over hundreds of thousands of years, there was “a sort of pulsation of this African population to the gate of western Asia,” he argues. These pulses may relate to so-called green Sahara episodes—intermittent periods of moister climate, when the current desert belt across North Africa was vegetated and people could move more freely.

Another interesting aspect of the discovery is the tools found alongside the fossil, says Julia Galway-Witham, a paleoanthropologist at the Natural History Museum in London. The tools were fashioned with a relatively sophisticated method of stone knapping called the Levallois technique, which requires skill and forethought and allows greater control over the resulting scrapers or blades.

“They represent the earliest association of this type of tool with modern humans outside Africa,” she says. “Perhaps the co-occurrence of this tool type with early Homo sapiens at Jebel Irhoud, Morocco—and now with modern humans at Misliya—indicates some association of the development of this technology in Africa and western Asia with the emergence of Homo sapiens in these regions.”

With plenty of ongoing archaeological research in the Levant region, new fossils that can potentially answer the lingering questions about human migration into Asia may soon be found, Grün says.


And the latest genetic work hints that there may have been even earlier treks out of Africa—and into the midst of other human species, adds Hublin. An analysis of ancient DNA in a 124,000-year-old German Neanderthal bone suggests that Neanderthals may have interbred with our own species more than 220,000 years ago.

https://news.nationalgeographic.com...-africa-discovered-fossil-jaw-israel-science/

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6374/456

Earliest modern humans out of Africa


Recent paleoanthropological studies have suggested that modern humans migrated from Africa as early as the beginning of the Late Pleistocene, 120,000 years ago. Hershkovitz et al. now suggest that early modern humans were already present outside of Africa more than 55,000 years earlier (see the Perspective by Stringer and Galway-Witham). During excavations of sediments at Mount Carmel, Israel, they found a fossil of a mouth part, a left hemimaxilla, with almost complete dentition.


The sediments contain a series of well-defined hearths and a rich stone-based industry, as well as abundant animal remains. Analysis of the human remains, and dating of the site and the fossil itself, indicate a likely age of at least 177,000 years for the fossil—making it the oldest member of the Homo sapiens clade found outside Africa.


Science, this issue p. 456; see also p. 389


Abstract


To date, the earliest modern human fossils found outside of Africa are dated to around 90,000 to 120,000 years ago at the Levantine sites of Skhul and Qafzeh. A maxilla and associated dentition recently discovered at Misliya Cave, Israel, was dated to 177,000 to 194,000 years ago, suggesting that members of the Homo sapiens clade left Africa earlier than previously thought. This finding changes our view on modern human dispersal and is consistent with recent genetic studies, which have posited the possibility of an earlier dispersal of Homo sapiens around 220,000 years ago. The Misliya maxilla is associated with full-fledged Levallois technology in the Levant, suggesting that the emergence of this technology is linked to the appearance of Homo sapiens in the region, as has been documented in Africa.
 
Razib Khan's take on it:
http://www.razib.com/wordpress/

"[FONT=&quot] this reinforces the reality that [/FONT]anatomically modern humans were geographically already widespread ~200,000 years ago. I would say that this informs and updates our estimation of the plausibility of the Jebel Irhoud modern humans in Morocco, who flourished ~300,000 years ago. It also makes more sense of the reality that most of the ancestors of the Khoisan likely diverged from other modern lineages ~200,000 years ago (or more, depending on who you talk to). Finally, it makes recent archaeological finds of modern humans or their artifacts in East Asia tens of thousands of years before the great expansion of neo-African humanity50,000-60,000 years before the present much more plausible."

"
[FONT=&quot]Where does this leave us? In [/FONT]The Guardian[FONT=&quot] David Reich observes that ‘It’s important to distinguish between the migration out of Africa that’s being discussed here and the “out-of-Africa” migration that is most commonly discussed when referring to genetic data. This [Misliya] lineage contributed little if anything to present-day people.’[/FONT][FONT=&quot]Obviously, this is an important point. But we know that the first modern humans to settle Europe did not leave any descendants either. The modern human settlement of Europe was still nevertheless important. Second, these early wave humans may have given modern populations adaptive variants that are present at high frequencies in modern lineages."

Dienekes has also posted about it: Out of Africa, A Theory in Crisis. I wish we heard more from him nowadays.

"The sensational discovery of modern humans in the Levant 177-194 thousand years ago should cause a rethink of the currently held Out-of-Africa orthodoxy.[/FONT]


By Out-of-Africa, I mean here the origin of anatomically modern humans, as opposed to the earlier origin of the genus Homo or the later origin of behaviorally fully modern humans.

Two main pieces of evidence supported the conventional OOA theory:

1. The observation that modern Eurasians possess a subset of the genetic variation of modern Africans.
2. The greater antiquity of AMH humans in the African rather than the Eurasian palaeoanthropological record.

Both these observations are in crisis.

1a. The oldest African fossil AMH is in North Africa (Morocco, Jebel Irhoud); modern genetic variation does not single out this region as a potential source of modern humans. In short, modern genetic variation has nothing to say about where AMH originated.
1b. Eurasians can no longer be seen as a subset of Africans, given that they possess genetic variation from Denisovans, a layer of ancestry earlier than all extant AMH. While it is still true that most Eurasian genetic material is a subset of that of modern Africans, it is also true that the deepest known lineage of humans is the Denisovan-Sima de los huesos, with no evidence for any deeper African lineage. Within humans as a whole, Africans possess a subset of Eurasian genetic variation.
2a. African priority received a boost by 0.1My by the redating of Jebel Irhoud last year. And, non-African AMH received a boost of 0.05My by the Hershkovitz et al. paper yesterday. A very short time ago, Ethiopia boasted the oldest AMH by 0.07My and now it's tied with the Levant and beaten by Morocco. It's a bit silly to argue for temporal priority based on the spotty and ever-shifting palaeoanthropological record.
2b. It is virtually untenable to consider the ~120,000 year old Shkul/Qafzeh hominins as a failed Out-of-Africa, since it now seems that they may have been descendants from the Mislya Cave population of >50,000 or even >100,000 years earlier.

I had previously supported a "two deserts" theory of human origins in which AMH originated in North Africa (Sahara) and then left Africa >100kya as evidenced by the Shkul/Qafzeh hominins and/or the Nubian technocomplex in Arabia. While I am still convinced that AMH originated somewhere in North Africa or the Near East, I am less certain as to where."
 
I think the assumption of the team of scholars that all the ~60,000 parts of stone tools were definitely and undoubtedly made by modern humans a bit too far-fetched. Why would it be impossible that Neanderthals had done at least part of them, and their territory had been recently occupied by modern humans who kept using the same cave? It seems a bit premature to be talking about a human migration to Asia more than 220,000 years ago based on that huge number of toos accumulated into the cave, if the only real evidence of a modern human is this jaw bone of ~194,000 y.o.
 
there were no modern humans in Europe prior to 50 ka, because this territory was occupied by Neanderthals
only the last, succesfull wave with blade tools settled in Europe

the descendants of Jebel Irhoud there were 2 :
the Skhul and Qafzeh people in the southern Levant, who went extinct 80 ka
the Aterians in northern Africa, who went extinct 30 ka when the Sahara began to expand again, as an onset to LGM

I find the 330 ka Levallois tools in Armenia much more intruiging than this 180 ka fossil in the Levant
 

This thread has been viewed 3679 times.

Back
Top