Is race just a social construct?

Why do you continuously make comments which can be so easily disproved?

The definition I used comes from David Reich. Have you heard of him?

Honestly, as always with you, it just gets too tedious to continue.
 
Most Rwandans were Hutus, who were genetically identical with Tutsis.

It is not true that Hutus and Tutsis are genetically identical.

Hutus are pretty much pure Bantu, while Tutsis have mixed Cushitic, Nilotic and Bantu ancestry.

Only approximately 20-25% of Tutsis ancestry is Bantu, while in the case of Hutus vast majority.
 
"Hutus" were people who farmed crops, while "Tutsis" were people who tended livestock.

Yes because Tutsis were descended mostly (75-80%) from East African Pastoralists, while Hutus mostly from Bantu Farmers.

So they inherited these occupations from their respective ancestors.

For some reason the Tutsis at some point adopted a Bantu language, despite the fact that only 20-25% of their DNA is Bantu.
 
Why do you continuously make comments which can be so easily disproved?

The definition I used comes from David Reich. Have you heard of him?

Honestly, as always with you, it just gets too tedious to continue.


the definition you used is one of many others.

your argument was that a race model based on those 3 "continental breeding populations" was somehow not based on pure types and thus more legitimate than others. yet you haven't answered: what race is someone from central asia in that case? or someone from Latin America?
 
Last edited:
the definition you used is one of many others.

your argument was that a race model based on those 3 "continental breeding populations" was somehow not based on pure types and thus more legitimate than others. yet you haven't answered: what race is someone from central asia in that case? or someone from Latin America?

What makes you think race is just a construct?


I have already informed everyone that it was a BS statement made by a bias-Marxist geneticist, who's idea was so stupid, it became its own fallacy. Maybe if academia wasn't so polluted by left-wing political bias, something so ridiculous would never be regurgitated.

It is pseudoscience to say race is simply a social construct.

It is like saying, "we all bleed red, man". Who cares, a dog bleeds red, a mouse bleeds red. It is just a brainless statement.
 
What makes you think race is just a construct?


I have already informed everyone that it was a BS statement made by a bias-Marxist geneticist, who's idea was so stupid, it became its own fallacy. Maybe if academia wasn't so polluted by left-wing political bias, something so ridiculous would never be regurgitated.

It is pseudoscience to say race is simply a social construct.

It is like saying, "we all bleed red, man". Who cares, a dog bleeds red, a mouse bleeds red. It is just a brainless statement.

Why does it have to be always "the leftist" who are the most dangerous in this matter? I'am a moderate leftist, no marxist (a political tradition unknown in the US you are not familiar with it), I underline what Angela has stated here above (within the "Reich reach"). I strongly object to see the left wing as all one and the same....that is not the case!

And don't underestimate the danger of racialist thought of the extreme right in the US (from Trump to the proud boys) and the diverse variants of it in Europe. Here in the Netherlands the Trump nephews begin about the boreal race etc. I'm afraid even on a level that I suppose that you don't fall beneath that definition. That's brainless too I guess. And what kind of pollution is that Jovialis? And I see also in the forum sphere theories, a revival of thoughts from before and during ww2....clearcut racialist thoughts.

So please, even more on an Euro forum, take in account that "the leftist" or "the right" are too gross.
 
Why does it have to be always "the leftist" who are the most dangerous in this matter? I'am a moderate leftist, no marxist (a political tradition unknown in the US you are not familiar with it), I underline what Angela has stated here above (within the "Reich reach"). I strongly object to see the left wing as all one and the same....that is not the case!

And don't underestimate the danger of racialist thought of the extreme right in the US (from Trump to the proud boys) and the diverse variants of it in Europe. Here in the Netherlands the Trump nephews begin about the boreal race etc. I'm afraid even on a level that I suppose that you don't fall beneath that definition. That's brainless too I guess. And what kind of pollution is that Jovialis? And I see also in the forum sphere theories, a revival of thoughts from before and during ww2....clearcut racialist thoughts.

So please, even more on an Euro forum, take in account that "the leftist" or "the right" are too gross.

Well, in this case it was indeed a Marxist, Richard Lewanton.

Also, I don't give a crap about far-right racialism, because many of these people probably don't even "speak the same language" (i.e. subscribe to archaeogenetic or mainstream science) as me. And the ones that do, (I deal with them sometimes as a moderator you know) are complete idiots that don't even fully understand the subject.

Political bias of any kind is pollution in a scientific discussion.

I don't know why people think the US is devoid of leftism. In fact, we probably have more left-wingers of the extreme type, than in Europe. Even in our news media, government bodies, and corporations. The left pretty much control everything here. Well, at least as lip services, so a few billionaires can get wealthier and retain power. Perception is power.
 
Well, in this case it was indeed a Marxist, Richard Lewanton.

Also, I don't give a crap about far-right racialism, because many of these people probably don't even "speak the same language" (i.e. subscribe to archaeogenetic or mainstream science) as me. And the ones that do, (I deal with them sometimes as a moderator you know) are complete idiots that don't even fully understand the subject.

Political bias of any kind is pollution in a scientific discussion.

I don't know why people think the US is devoid of leftism. In fact, we probably have more left-wingers of the extreme type, than in Europe. Even in our news media, government bodies, and corporations. The left pretty much control everything here. Well, at least as lip services, so a few billionaires can get wealthier and retain power. Perception is power.

The point is Jovialis is that you consider this as a matter of academics......I consider this not only as a thing of nutty and or woke professors. This is a matter in politics too.....And as fare as I can see not only the oddity of the theories but the political power to 'pollute' the discours is much stronger from the extreme right.... in the US as in Europe. We in the Netherlands already live in a situation in which 'boreality' is already introduced in the debate.

So we can't give a crap about them meanwhile they try to dominate the discours:petrified:
 
What makes you think race is just a construct?


I have already informed everyone that it was a BS statement made by a bias-Marxist geneticist, who's idea was so stupid, it became its own fallacy. Maybe if academia wasn't so polluted by left-wing political bias, something so ridiculous would never be regurgitated.

It is pseudoscience to say race is simply a social construct.

It is like saying, "we all bleed red, man". Who cares, a dog bleeds red, a mouse bleeds red. It is just a brainless statement.

if we would just look at biology, racial groups would not be needed. they exist mostly for social reasons. if you don't think so you could give examples, when are racial groupings justified in society if we exclude all possible social reasons? for example in medicine? there it's now "personalized" medicine not "racialized". and race is not a good predictor.
 
The point is Jovialis is that you consider this as a matter of academics......I consider this not only as a thing of nutty and or woke professors. This is a matter in politics too.....And as fare as I can see not only the oddity of the theories but the political power to 'pollute' the discours is much stronger from the extreme right.... in the US as in Europe. We in the Netherlands already live in a situation in which 'boreality' is already introduced in the debate.
So we can't give a crap about them meanwhile they try to dominate the discours:petrified:
They say the farthest thing from love is not hate, but apathy. I find it is just best to just accept that some people will always have different opinions, and not let it consume my time. To me this is the optimal way of dealing with these matters
 
The point is Jovialis is that you consider this as a matter of academics......I consider this not only as a thing of nutty and or woke professors. This is a matter in politics too.....And as fare as I can see not only the oddity of the theories but the political power to 'pollute' the discours is much stronger from the extreme right.... in the US as in Europe. We in the Netherlands already live in a situation in which 'boreality' is already introduced in the debate.

So we can't give a crap about them meanwhile they try to dominate the discours:petrified:

i wonder what are the arguments that the "boreal" race doesn't exist? because they are too close to other europeans? wouldn't this be Lewontin's argument?
 
They say the farthest thing from love is not hate, but apathy. I find it is just best to just accept that some people will always have different opinions, and not let it consume my time. To me this is the optimal way of dealing with these matters

MMM this leads to remarks regarding "marxist" or "leftist" professors....but the the current state of the public debate-no matter how odd- is not a topic of interest?

Imo apathy can in the end lead to "unpleasant surprises" (to put it mildly).
 
i wonder what are the arguments that the "boreal" race doesn't exist? because they are too close to other europeans? wouldn't this be Lewontin's argument?

Do I have to answer it? I guess the one who states that there is a boreal race has to show that it exist doesn't it? As Angela already showed you this (pic) where should you draw the line?



Hey a solution:unsure:, the real boreals are the Finns (in the right upper corner)... NW (actual most of Europe) Europe falls outside of it.....

Something says to me this is not what they aim.....:LOL:
 
Do I have to answer it? I guess the one who states that there is a boreal race has to show that it exist doesn't it? As Angela already showed you this (pic) where should you draw the line?



Hey a solution:unsure:, the real boreals are the Finns (in the right upper corner)... NW (actual most of Europe) Europe falls outside of it.....

Something says to me this is not what they aim.....:LOL:

you could draw the line somewhere between the swedes and northern germans. pretty much anywhere you want. the only thing speaking against it would be Lewontin's marxist arguments.
 
you could draw the line somewhere between the swedes and northern germans. pretty much anywhere you want. the only thing speaking against it would be Lewontin's marxist arguments.

And then? The North Germans and the rest of the Europeans are non- boreal?
 
exactly. maybe more or less boreal-like, but not boreal.

Ok, that already reveals how odd this exercise is, because "ultra-Germanic" populations (like the North Germans) would fall outside this "boreal" range....do you really think this would be the aim of the extreme right?
 
If people land somewhere on a PCA, it is what it is. I don't understand what the solution would be, but not study genetics?

Also, are you willing to sacrifice a level of freedom of speech so people cannot reflect on what a boreal race could be?

Also, why is it evil to acknowledge that it might even have some basis in reality. I think it is easy to define what a Nordic person is, compared to other Europeans.
 
The point is Jovialis is that you consider this as a matter of academics......I consider this not only as a thing of nutty and or woke professors. This is a matter in politics too.....And as fare as I can see not only the oddity of the theories but the political power to 'pollute' the discours is much stronger from the extreme right.... in the US as in Europe. We in the Netherlands already live in a situation in which 'boreality' is already introduced in the debate.

So we can't give a crap about them meanwhile they try to dominate the discours:petrified:

I've spent my entire more than ten years commenting on population genetics fighting the racialism which has always been present in the "amateur" world, as perhaps you know. I've said more than once that it's the dark underbelly of population genetics.

So, I do find it troubling and alarming that "boreality" which is just another word for Nordicism, is now an accepted part of the political conversation in Europe. I take a grim amusement in the fact that as to my concerns that racialism was still a "mostly" silent substratum in a lot of discussions about population genetics particularly as it affects Italian and Greek and perhaps even Balkan genetics, I was, and am, often told that I was seeing things which weren't there.

It doesn't matter that it makes no sense; that no rational person could believe, for example, that the civilizations which formed the basis for western civilization, i.e the ancient Roman and Greek civilizations were "Nordic", just as it didn't matter that the Nazi propaganda that Jews were "inferior" made no sense. Dangerous ideas can spread even if they make no sense.

Where I would differ, and perhaps Jovialis as well, although I really shouldn't speak for him, is that in the U.S., despite what the news coverage might lead you to believe, this kind of discussion could never happen either in the political arena or in private. If some tiny minority believes it, most keep quiet about it; those who speak it out loud become pariahs. I know you probably won't believe me, but it's true. People like that are a tiny, tiny, minority, dwarfed by the number of anti fa and BLM supporters. I know a lot of Trump supporters, more since I've moved further away from N.Y.C., and I've never heard an anti-Jewish, anti-Near Easterner or Indian or Chinese or Black statement come out of their mouths.

I don't think it would even occur to them to make a Southern European comment. You forget how many whole or part Southern Italians not only live in the U.S. but have become prominent and completely accepted. It's a different world from Europe. I've never in my life in the U.S. been belittled or attacked for my ethnicity, but it happened in Switzerland, and in Germany, places I will never again visit and whose products I will under no circumstances buy. Hell, some of the Trump supporters "are" Italian or Hispanic or Jewish, and even black, the latter of which is small but growing. I'm not saying these bigoted beliefs or feelings didn't once exist, but I'm sure I'm older than you, and even anti-black comments are a distant memory. The civil rights movement completely put an end to that kind of thinking.

The reason that some of us are so "anti-Woke", is that this ideology is not only becoming mainstream by force in the U.S., it is controlling the present and the future. It isn't right wing policies which have led to the wave of violence shaking this country, affecting predominantly the minority areas of major cities but now spilling outward, the virtual shuttering down of once wonderful American cities like San Francisco because of riots, large scale coordinated looting, and on and on. Right wingers aren't telling school children they should sit with their "race" during lunch and at recess. What are Americans to think when our government had us on lockdown for so long, living with masks, getting all our injections, and then seeing a wide open border where the unvaccinated flow through unhindered, people who in a time when so many Americans are suffering from economic hardship, will get financial aid, driving licenses, and in some cases a right to vote even though they're not citizens and don't even hold a green card. That certainly wasn't how it worked when we immigrated here. Or how about the horrifying number of deaths from opiate and cocaine addiction? Those drugs come into the country unimpeded with those same migrants.

To point these things out and to be concerned about them is not to be a racialist or even to be an extreme right winger. I've never voted for Trump, and I think and thought he was a loud mouthed jerk, but even supporting him doesn't make someone a racialist. These concerns are real and if not addressed I fear for my adopted country.
 
I've spent my entire more than ten years commenting on population genetics fighting the racialism which has always been present in the "amateur" world, as perhaps you know. I've said more than once that it's the dark underbelly of population genetics.

So, I do find it troubling and alarming that "boreality" which is just another word for Nordicism, is now an accepted part of the political conversation in Europe. I take a grim amusement in the fact that as to my concerns that racialism was still a "mostly" silent substratum in a lot of discussions about population genetics particularly as it affects Italian and Greek and perhaps even Balkan genetics, I was, and am, often told that I was seeing things which weren't there.

It doesn't matter that it makes no sense; that no rational person could believe, for example, that the civilizations which formed the basis for western civilization, i.e the ancient Roman and Greek civilizations were "Nordic", just as it didn't matter that the Nazi propaganda that Jews were "inferior" made no sense. Dangerous ideas can spread even if they make no sense.

Where I would differ, and perhaps Jovialis as well, although I really shouldn't speak for him, is that in the U.S., despite what the news coverage might lead you to believe, this kind of discussion could never happen either in the political arena or in private. If some tiny minority believes it, most keep quiet about it; those who speak it out loud become pariahs. I know you probably won't believe me, but it's true. People like that are a tiny, tiny, minority, dwarfed by the number of anti fa and BLM supporters. I know a lot of Trump supporters, more since I've moved further away from N.Y.C., and I've never heard an anti-Jewish, anti-Near Easterner or Indian or Chinese or Black statement come out of their mouths.

I don't think it would even occur to them to make a Southern European comment. You forget how many whole or part Southern Italians not only live in the U.S. but have become prominent and completely accepted. It's a different world from Europe. I've never in my life in the U.S. been belittled or attacked for my ethnicity, but it happened in Switzerland, and in Germany, places I will never again visit and whose products I will under no circumstances buy. Hell, some of the Trump supporters "are" Italian or Hispanic or Jewish, and even black, the latter of which is small but growing. I'm not saying these bigoted beliefs or feelings didn't once exist, but I'm sure I'm older than you, and even anti-black comments are a distant memory. The civil rights movement completely put an end to that kind of thinking.

The reason that some of us are so "anti-Woke", is that this ideology is not only becoming mainstream by force in the U.S., it is controlling the present and the future. It isn't right wing policies which have led to the wave of violence shaking this country, affecting predominantly the minority areas of major cities but now spilling outward, the virtual shuttering down of once wonderful American cities like San Francisco because of riots, large scale coordinated looting, and on and on. Right wingers aren't telling school children they should sit with their "race" during lunch and at recess. What are Americans to think when our government had us on lockdown for so long, living with masks, getting all our injections, and then seeing a wide open border where the unvaccinated flow through unhindered, people who in a time when so many Americans are suffering from economic hardship, will get financial aid, driving licenses, and in some cases a right to vote even though they're not citizens and don't even hold a green card. That certainly wasn't how it worked when we immigrated here. Or how about the horrifying number of deaths from opiate and cocaine addiction? Those drugs come into the country unimpeded with those same migrants.

To point these things out and to be concerned about them is not to be a racialist or even to be an extreme right winger. I've never voted for Trump, and I think and thought he was a loud mouthed jerk, but even supporting him doesn't make someone a racialist. These concerns are real and if not addressed I fear for my adopted country.

For San Fransico, the son of two murderers from the terrorist left-wing group, The Weather Underground, and adopted son of Bill Ayers, is the District Attorney, Chesa Boudin. He is responsible for the extreme level of crime there, and smash and grab thefts. He basically legalized theft. Right now, there is a recall election that had over 80,000 signatures. There are other DAs just like him throughout the country who are destroying the quality of life throughout the US.
 

This thread has been viewed 59530 times.

Back
Top