Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: New standards for ancient protein studies set forth by multi-national research group

  1. #1
    Moderator Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,807
    Points
    89,017
    Level
    92
    Points: 89,017, Level: 92
    Level completed: 83%, Points required for next Level: 333
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.

    New standards for ancient protein studies set forth by multi-national research group

    A team of researchers from institutions at the leading edge of the new field of palaeoproteomics have published guidelines to provide it with a firm foundation. Ancient proteins are used to study everything from extinct species to ancient human diets to the evolution of diseases, and more. The guide, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, aims to support good practices in the field and to ensure the generation of robust, reproducible results.

    The field of palaeoproteomics - the analysis of ancient proteins - has jumped into the spotlight in recent years. Preserving ten times longer than DNA, ancient proteins offer scientists a unique glimpse into the distant past. New technologies have made this work increasingly powerful, and its results increasingly detailed. Scientists can now use trace amounts of archaeological proteins to reconstruct the relationships of extinct megafauna, track the spread of dairying in prehistory, and characterize immune responses in people who died thousands of years ago. This has allowed researchers to better answer a range of questions, from the evolution of extinct species, to the reconstruction of past human diets, to a better understanding of chronic diseases.

    A set of guidelines to provide consistency to a new field

    As a young discipline, palaeoproteomics faces many of the same obstacles that once challenged the field of ancient DNA, namely a lack of consistency in data reporting standards, authentication measures, and procedures taken to avoid contamination. Without rigorous standards, lab contamination and data artifacts can be easily misinterpreted, leading to false claims. In this publication, the authors set forth a number of "best practices" for the sampling, generation, analysis, and reporting of ancient protein sequence data in the scientific literature in order to support researchers, reviewers and editors. The team is notable as it includes international researchers from many of the top universities and institutes operating in this new field, including the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, the University of Copenhagen, the University of York, the University of Turin, the University of Oklahoma and the University of Zürich/ETH Zürich.

    The authors emphasize that they do not intend to create rigid, unbendable rules, or to overturn existing standards, but rather to consolidate and strengthen the field's best practices. "Undoubtedly, as new laboratory and statistical strategies for characterizing proteins emerge, these guidelines will require debate within the community and further updating," states co-lead author Frido Welker, of the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. "However, we hope that the standards of practice presented here will help to provide a firm foundation for palaeoproteomics as a technique for use in a variety of fields."

    Harnessing the potential of new methods

    In particular, the researchers stress that publications must at a minimum provide adequate details on how data were generated and authenticated, so that others can effectively evaluate the results. "Palaeoproteomics holds enormous potential to dramatically expand archaeological, palaeontological and evolutionary research," explains co-lead author Jessica Hendy, of the Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. "It is crucial that the discipline hold itself to high standards in order to ensure that it is able to meet this potential."

    Read more at: https://phys.org/news/2018-03-standa...group.html#jCp

    https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-018-0510-x

  2. #2
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    04-02-18
    Posts
    110
    Points
    1,652
    Level
    11
    Points: 1,652, Level: 11
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 198
    Overall activity: 5.0%


    Country: USA - Connecticut



    The amazing tools kits and their availability captures the imagination as well the vast opportunities that exist. The fact that the scientific communities monitor and police themselves demonstrates just how important these discoveries really are. The responsibilities of new methodology demonstrate a commitment to order at a time of chaos.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points1 year registered

    Join Date
    04-02-18
    Posts
    110
    Points
    1,652
    Level
    11
    Points: 1,652, Level: 11
    Level completed: 34%, Points required for next Level: 198
    Overall activity: 5.0%


    Country: USA - Connecticut



    Monitoring tool kits

    Capturing the guide lines adds another way to demonstrate the importance of this information. The most relevant reality is the step by step process that isolates the specificity
    new standards.jpg (1221×1472)






Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •