Interesting. I have several French-speaking Belgians with higher percentages of Tuscany (up to 20%). Actually most of them have over 10%.
Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Ecology | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
![]() |
Hallo, I'm from North East of Italy, this is the results of the "Complete" section. What do you think? Thank you
Europe 90.2%
Europe (South) 57.9% North Italy 18.8% Tuscany 12.3% South Italy 9.9% Iberian Peninsula 9.5% Aegean 5.8% Sardinia 1.5%
Europe (North and West) 19.4% France 14.4% Scandinavia 2.6% Germanic 2.3%
Europe (East) 9.2% West Balkans 5.1% East Balkans 4.2%
Great Britain and Ireland 3.7% England and Wales 3.7%
Near East 9.8%
North Turkey 5.2% Kurdish 2.9% Iran 1.7%
Interesting. I have several French-speaking Belgians with higher percentages of Tuscany (up to 20%). Actually most of them have over 10%.
My book selection---Follow me on Facebook and Twitter --- My profile on Academia.edu and on ResearchGate ----Check Wa-pedia's Japan Guide----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"What is the use of living, if it be not to strive for noble causes and to make this muddled world a better place for those who will live in it after we are gone?", Winston Churchill.
That's a high amount of Asian admixture even for a northern Italian
Ehi ! Ciao ! Mizzica sei un bel mix di cose... pensando anche ai miei risultati ... my European percentage is higher than yours (94.5) , my Europe south percentage is higher also(74,5) ,my Tuscan is percentage is lower ( sul 7%) , I have not any south Italy component, nor any iberian component, mt Aegean is 64,5%( essendo albanese) and the Sardinian componenf is the same as yours... etc etc
Per curiosità... have you got your y/ mtdna ?
Mine being I2 ( CTS10028)
Mtdna - H(H15)
Sent from my iPhone using Eupedia Forum
Dimenticavo.... strano che a un albanese come me non abbiano rilevato niente di ‘Near east’.. perché a quanto pare a te sì ...
Sent from my iPhone using Eupedia Forum
Ciao Gabriele, I'm R-U152 and H1a3
The high percentage of near East is maybe due at the influence of the Republic of Venice? I'm from Veneto
Thank you for your reply! Maybe is so( referring to the ‘Veneto’ contest) Buona giornata !
Sent from my iPhone using Eupedia Forum
I value your expertise, experience, and insight.
In your opinion which DNA Testing Company provides the most accurate Autosomal/Ancestry Results ?
Which Company Results should we reference as proof of Ancestry when posting on Eupedia ?
Which Company we should NOT Reference to make a point?
Thanks in advance Maciamo.
I need your help for the interpretation of the results, thank you
Have you uploaded your raw data on Gedmatch Genesis? If so, can you post your Harappa and Eurogenes K15 results?
LivingDNA has likely a problem with the North Italy reference population, many North Italians score small percentages of North Italy, and usually not more than 15/20%. On the other hand, North Italians can score also over 30% of Great Britain and Ireland, and this move them too far north-west, and so there is need for a reference population rich in CHG to put them back into position.
I've seen a similar pattern in a couple of persons who are mix of Ligurian and Veneto, so a mix of north western and north eastern Italian. They both score very low North Italy (one of the two scores 5% North Italy!), not more than 50/60% South European, over 30% of Great Britain and Ireland or Europe North and West (one of the two scores 39% of Great Britain and Ireland), and they both have around 5-10% of Kurdish/Iran/Pashtun.... There are even fully British people who score a bit of it.
Iscriviti qui sotto e carica il tuo raw data (Generic Uploads (23andme, FTDNA, AncestryDNA, most others). In poche ore puoi utilizzare i tool di gedmatch che servono ad analizzare il tuo genoma. Sono tutti strumenti amatoriali ma siccome esiste ormai un pattern consolidato, se ne possono ricavare comunque delle informazioni utili.
https://genesis.gedmatch.com/
Some of the Gedmatch calculators confuse S.Italians with Ashkenazi.
Alcuni calcolatori di Gedmatch confondono i Sud-Italiani con gli Aschenazi.
Forse per questo motivo (alcune speculazioni):
This is probably the reason (some speculations):
https://www.google.com/amp/s/notpoli...onnection/amp/
https://geneticliteracyproject.org/2...study-asserts/
I have reviewed all the ancestral DNA tests here. At present none of the autosomal report can be said to be totally accurate. The most interesting report is Living DNA and their report is going to get much better thanks to the One Family One World Project.
maciamo dont forget that they are using imputation
it can effect results .....
it is pretty different from my ftdna raw data especialy in the european components of eurogenes k36.....
i still think living dna is good test because you get all the package for a fair price{ autosomal+y dna+mtdna}
which one of the 7 provinces of the region of veneto are you from..........my family line paternal and maternal are from Treviso province
my latest admixture ( and seems to be slightly changing forever but settled after BigY ) is 98.8 european and 1.2 central asian ..........for what it is worth
có che un pòpoło no 'l defende pi ła só łéngua el xe prónto par èser s'ciavo
when a people no longer dares to defend its language it is ripe for slavery.
Two days ago I have uploaded the raw data on Gedmatch, there is always this: Kits marked with ** have been tokenized, but have not completed batch processing. They are available for one-to-one comparisons, but not one-to-many comparisons.
Because you have uploaded the raw data on the old Gedmatch site, instead you should have uploaded your raw data on Genesis Gedmatch. LivingDNA raw data works only on Genesis Gedmatch.
Genesis Gedmatch
https://genesis.gedmatch.com/