Genetic admixture of Balkans, Southern Europe

[Georgewalley]

Early European farmer peaks in Neolithic Iberians followed by modern Sardinians, North Italians and the popultions closeby the Atlantic coast
Near Eastern recent includes both Bronze age and Recent Near Eastern admixture which spreaded into Europe during the last 3500-4000 years
North Eastern or Slavic peaks in modern North Slavic speaker populations and in those who had been in contact with those populations.
Afro Asiatic Peaks in Bedouins and North Eastern Africans
Sub Saharan was modelled on Yoruba and peaks in West Africans
Eurasian includes South Indian, Siberian, Native American, East Asian and Oceanian

Another map using different methods make it more accurate for Near Eastern and Caucasus related populations. There's a clear difference between Georgians and Georgian Jews, despite both populations been living there for hundreds of years but the Georgian Jew population , similarly to Ashkenazim shows an elevated Levant/Fertile Descent related ancestry which makes them more similar to other Jewish populations than the locals genome.

 

[Angela]

Early European farmer peaks in Neolithic Iberians followed by modern Sardinians, North Italians and the popultions closeby the Atlantic coast
Near Eastern recent includes both Bronze age and Recent Near Eastern admixture which spreaded into Europe during the last 3500-4000 years
North Eastern or Slavic peaks in modern North Slavic speaker populations and in those who had been in contact with those populations.
Afro Asiatic Peaks in Bedouins and North Eastern Africans
Sub Saharan was modelled on Yoruba and peaks in West Africans
Eurasian includes South Indian, Siberian, Native American, East Asian and Oceanian

Here we go again. Don't you people ever get tired of this game? YAWN :useless:

If I find you've posted from the same IP under a banned user name, you're out of here hombre, understand?

 

[Ygorcs]

What would "Near Eastern Recent" really be if modern Near Easterners also have, within their particular genetic mix, a sizeable ANF clearly related to EEF, especially if you single out West Asia (Anatolia, Caucasus, Iran) and the northern Levant (Syria)? What does that admixture really refer to? Is it just non-EEF-related Middle Easterner or what else? I mean, EEF is basically nothing but WHG-enriched ANF. Thus I think that using the "wrong" labels can give us a very misleading picture of the real degree of ancient-level relationship among peoples.

 

[Angela]

That's over and beyond the fact that there is no sourcing, no information about samples, program used, dates etc.

"Near Eastern" ancestry includes EEF/ANF ancestry and also Iran Neo type ancestry which started arriving in Italy, the Balkans, Greece and even Iberia (although lower there) in the Bronze Age. Is that what's meant by "recent"? How do you untangle that from ancestry that came in the first millenium BC or in the Roman era or in the Middle Ages without ancient dna?

It's all b.s. by an obvious t-roll, and unworthy of notice.

 

[Georgewalley]

It seems this forum isn't the best place to make a thread without the constant ad hominem attacks and critique coming from incompetent users.

 

[Ygorcs]

It seems this forum isn't the best place to make a thread without the constant ad hominem attacks and critique coming from incompetent users.

Refrain from using offensive language against members, especially moderators. This tone will not be any further accepted, okay? You're warned. Granted that no one deserves gratuitous (mark this word) ad hominem attacks, but you and anyone else deserves and must accept critiques for anything you posted. Nobody's entitled to receive just compliments and gentle comments about what they decide to write publicly.

The main problem with your topic is that you jus threw in some data and comments, but it's totally unclear what you really mean or what your conclusion is. You shouldn't expect people to not find something suspicious in it or then to make their own conclusions (correct or wrong as they may be) based on the vague things you wrote, because you yourself didn't make them unambiguous. Why don't you try to be your point more well explained and unequivocal?