• Don't want to see ads? Install an adblocker like uBlock Origin or use a Europe-based privacy-friendly browser like Vivaldi or Mullvad.

The peopling of the last Green Sahara

Pax Augusta

Elite member
Messages
2,262
Reaction score
2,544
Points
113
Location
Ara Pacis
Ethnic group
Italian
A couple of recent papers.


- The peopling of the last Green Sahara revealed by high-coverage resequencing of trans-Saharan patrilineages.

Eugenia D’Atanasio et al

Little is known about the peopling of the Sahara during the Holocene climatic optimum, when the desert was replaced by a fertile environment.

RESULTS:

In order to investigate the role of the last Green Sahara in the peopling of Africa, we deep-sequence the whole non-repetitive portion of the Y chromosome in 104 males selected as representative of haplogroups which are currently found to the north and to the south of the Sahara. We identify 5,966 mutations, from which we extract 142 informative markers then genotyped in about 8,000 subjects from 145 African, Eurasian and African American populations. We find that the coalescence age of the trans-Saharan haplogroups dates back to the last Green Sahara, while most northern African or sub-Saharan clades expanded locally in the subsequent arid phase.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings suggest that the Green Sahara promoted human movements and demographic expansions, possibly linked to the adoption of pastoralism. Comparing our results with previously reported genome-wide data, we also find evidence for a sex-biased sub-Saharan contribution to northern Africans, suggesting that historical events such as the trans-Saharan slave trade mainly contributed to the mtDNA and autosomal gene pool, whereas the northern African paternal gene pool was mainly shaped by more ancient events.


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5809971/



- A history of male migration in and out of the Green Sahara


Yali Xue

Abstract

The Sahara was once fertile; a recent study identifies human Y-chromosomal lineages that flourished in this Green Sahara and their relation to present-day populations.

Introduction

Modern humans originated in Africa at least 300 thousand years ago (kya). The migration out of Africa (~ 60 kya) was central to human history, but the subsequent migrations and demographic events within Africa, stimulated by climate changes, developments in technology and other historical factors remain under-appreciated and under-studied. A recent study [1], focusing on the consequences of climatic changes in the Saharan region over the past 12 thousand years, fills one of the gaps in our knowledge of human migration.

Y-chromosomal lineages from the Green Sahara

The transformation of the Sahara over the past 12 thousand years has been profound: a once hospitable environment with lakes, savannahs and animals 5–12 kya (referred to as the Green Sahara or the Holocene Wet Phase) has become a hostile environment that forms the largest non-Polar desert on earth. This transition is expected to have had major consequences for the human inhabitants of the region and may have left imprints in the genomes of nearby present-day populations, but can these traces be identified?
D’Atanasio et al. [1] focused on the Y chromosome to address this question. The ~ 60 Mb Y chromosome is inherited from father to son, and no recombination occurs on most of its length. Therefore, this chromosome gradually accumulates mutations and thus provides a particularly simple and detailed record of human history, at least as it has impacted men. This record is enhanced by the historical tendency of men to remain near their birthplace, leading to a strong geographical structure of Y chromosome types. For decades, dedicated researchers have distinguished Y-chromosomal lineages using genetic variants (identifying ‘haplogroups’) and have established the geographical distributions of these variants [2]. In the past few years, advances in genomic technology have made large-scale sequencing of Y chromosomes feasible, which in turn has transformed the field by enabling measurement of the mutation rate and construction of detailed, well-calibrated phylogenies. It is thus possible to use the distributions of present-day Y-chromosomal lineages to infer the historical movements of men.
D’Atanasio et al. [1] hypothesized that, because the Sahara has been such a strong barrier to human migration for the past 5000 years, haplogroups that are found in the current populations both to the north and to the south of the Sahara must have spread during the green phase. Previous work had identified four such haplogroups: A3-M13, E-M2, E-M78 and R-V88. (The letter prefix specifies the major Y lineage, and the suffix the particular Y-SNP that defines the lineage.) Targeted sequencing of the Y chromosomes (~ 3.3 Mb) of a set of 104 men, most of whom carried one of these four lineages, allowed D’Atanasio and colleagues to construct a dated phylogenetic tree. This tree, shown in a simplified form in Fig. 1a, revealed the coalescent time of these haplogroups: that is, the period of time that has elapsed since the most recent common ancestor of the haplogroups lived. These time points mostly lay within the 5–12 kya green period, although E-M78 showed a more complex history with some older and more diverse lineages. So, for example, all of the men carrying the A3-M13 Y chromosome are descendants down the male lineage of a single ancestor who lived 10.73 (SD 0.91) kya. Although there is no direct evidence that this ancestor lived in the Green Sahara, it is a simple and reasonable inference (Fig. 1b). Notably, the R-V88 lineage shows an additional striking feature: a very rapid expansion (visualized as lineages in the phylogeny branching so closely together that no mutations occurred between the origin of the different branches) at 5.73 (SD 0.49) kya.

https://genomebiology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13059-018-1410-8


13059_2018_1410_Fig1_HTML.gif
 
There is nothing new here. I theorised many years ago that R1b-V88 were Near Eastern cattle herders who colonised North Africa during the Neolithic, based on archaeological evidence and the coalescence age of various subclades. Their dating appears wrong to me. They estimate that R1b-V88 spread through North Africa 5000 years ago, while my estimates start from 9250 years ago in Egypt, 7500 years ago in Libya and 6500 years ago in Algeria.

On the other hand I wrote several years ago that E-M78 would be present in Late Palaeolithic North Africa and it was confirmed this year by ancient DNA from Morocco. So their paper is wrong about proposing an exclusively recent origin of E-M78. They indicate that North African E-M78 is only 2000 years ago, which is also nonsense. They should have dug deeper into the phylogeny as E-M78 is about 20,000 years old.

I am also surprised that they do not mention at all haplogroup T1a, which has a major presence in the Horn of Africa and a more minor one in the Sahara and Sahel that can also be dated back to the Neolithic Green Sahara.
 
There is nothing new here. I theorised many years ago that R1b-V88 were Near Eastern cattle herders who colonised North Africa during the Neolithic, based on archaeological evidence and the coalescence age of various subclades. Their dating appears wrong to me. They estimate that R1b-V88 spread through North Africa 5000 years ago, while my estimates start from 9250 years ago in Egypt, 7500 years ago in Libya and 6500 years ago in Algeria.
YFull significantly updated their V88 tree.

https://www.yfull.com/tree/R-V88/

It now looks like V88 was in North Africa 5300 years ago, branching out to Nigeria, Saudi Arabia, and Scotland. There appears to be an older and more eastern branch as well, but there's no evidence so far that it made it into SSA.
 
There is nothing new here. I theorised many years ago that R1b-V88 were Near Eastern cattle herders who colonised North Africa during the Neolithic, based on archaeological evidence and the coalescence age of various subclades. Their dating appears wrong to me. They estimate that R1b-V88 spread through North Africa 5000 years ago, while my estimates start from 9250 years ago in Egypt, 7500 years ago in Libya and 6500 years ago in Algeria.
On the other hand I wrote several years ago that E-M78 would be present in Late Palaeolithic North Africa and it was confirmed this year by ancient DNA from Morocco. So their paper is wrong about proposing an exclusively recent origin of E-M78. They indicate that North African E-M78 is only 2000 years ago, which is also nonsense. They should have dug deeper into the phylogeny as E-M78 is about 20,000 years old.
I am also surprised that they do not mention at all haplogroup T1a, which has a major presence in the Horn of Africa and a more minor one in the Sahara and Sahel that can also be dated back to the Neolithic Green Sahara.

T1a entered the horn of Africa via this.....Levant, NE Egypt, south Egypt, Eritrea then lastly the Horn via the DIR tribe of Somalia whose origins are from eritrea
 
So if R1b-V88 in Africa came from Near East and paleogenetic have shown that R1b-V88 was in prehistoric Balkans and Pontic Steppe, what is the pattern of their ancestral relationship ? Maybe a migration alongside R1b-M269 from the Balkans through Anatolia ?
 
So if R1b-V88 in Africa came from Near East and paleogenetic have shown that R1b-V88 was in prehistoric Balkans and Pontic Steppe, what is the pattern of their ancestral relationship ? Maybe a migration alongside R1b-M269 from the Balkans through Anatolia ?
Through Anatolia into Greece, but the data also suggests (less clearly) through Morocco into Spain. Most R1b in Europe appears to be M269 that is not L23.

There's no evidence of M269 moving through Central Europe. The R1b migration maps I've seen seem to be 99% speculation. A land based migration also doesn't explain the rapid naval expansion of R1b. So another explanation is a coast migration from Greece, or a migration utilizing major rivers.
 
Through Anatolia into Greece, but the data also suggests (less clearly) through Morocco into Spain. Most R1b in Europe appears to be M269 that is not L23.

There's no evidence of M269 moving through Central Europe. The R1b migration maps I've seen seem to be 99% speculation. A land based migration also doesn't explain the rapid naval expansion of R1b. So another explanation is a coast migration from Greece, or a migration utilizing major rivers.
R1b-V88 was not already in Africa that it was already found in mesolithic Balkans and neolithic Pontic Steppe. I'm not sure what you are trying to say, R1b-L23 is found all over the Pontic Steppe in the chalcolithic why would it come from anatolia into greece without any ancient samples showing it ? We are talking about ancient dna here not about modern distribution.
 
R1b-V88 was not already in Africa that it was already found in mesolithic Balkans and neolithic Pontic Steppe. I'm not sure what you are trying to say, R1b-L23 is found all over the Pontic Steppe in the chalcolithic why would it come from anatolia into greece without any ancient samples showing it ? We are talking about ancient dna here not about modern distribution.
There's very little ancient DNA for Africa.

One thing to keep in mind is climate change, there were several small ice ages that made North Eurasia a harsh environment.

temphistory21.jpg


The available evidence more or less supports the viewpoint that there was a massive population movement southwards 4200 BC and a massive population movement northwards 3000 BC.

So this needs to be taken into account when examining ancient DNA. There may have been other influences, but the Pontic Steppe and Europe may not have been a great place to be 4000 BC, while the Middle East and North Africa were prime real estate.

I think there's one V88 ancient DNA sample in Italy, but you can't draw strong conclusions based on that.
 
There's very little ancient DNA for Africa.

One thing to keep in mind is climate change, there were several small ice ages that made North Eurasia a harsh environment.

temphistory21.jpg


The available evidence more or less supports the viewpoint that there was a massive population movement southwards 4200 BC and a massive population movement northwards 3000 BC.

So this needs to be taken into account when examining ancient DNA. There may have been other influences, but the Pontic Steppe and Europe may not have been a great place to be 4000 BC, while the Middle East and North Africa were prime real estate.

I think there's one V88 ancient DNA sample in Italy, but you can't draw strong conclusions based on that.
Yes, but ice age never prevent humans to go in those harsh lands. The italian sample you are referring to, Villabruna 1 is R1b-L754. Looks more like R1b-V88 was in the vicinity of a neolithic expansion before going into africa, it can be everywhere from greece, anatolia, south caucasus. There is a R1b-V88 in early neolithic spain. But R1b-PF6279/V88 was found in mesolithic balkans, in the iron gates
 
Yes, but ice age never prevent humans to go in those harsh lands. The italian sample you are referring to, Villabruna 1 is R1b-L754. Looks more like R1b-V88 was in the vicinity of a neolithic expansion before going into africa, it can be everywhere from greece, anatolia, south caucasus. There is a R1b-V88 in early neolithic spain. But R1b-PF6279/V88 was found in mesolithic balkans, in the iron gates
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_of_1315–17

Yes and no, horse tribes would go wherever there was plenty of grassland, which probably was south of the Caucasus, and there would have been the equivalent of a gold rush when the Green Sahara was discovered. This doesn't mean the Pontic Steppe was fully abandoned, just that it ceased to be a region of significance.

I haven't deeply looked into the Balkans, it's a region of interest, but no real evidence that it was the main point of entry for M269. People are ignoring boatloads of contradictory evidence.
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Famine_of_1315–17

Yes and no, horse tribes would go wherever there was plenty of grassland, which probably was south of the Caucasus, and there would have been the equivalent of a gold rush when the Green Sahara was discovered. This doesn't mean the Pontic Steppe was fully abandoned, just that it ceased to be a region of significance.

I haven't deeply looked into the Balkans, it's a region of interest, but no real evidence that it was the main point of entry for M269. People are ignoring boatloads of contradictory evidence.
Yeah ok...
 
[h=1]Tales of Human Migration, Admixture, and Selection in Africa - by Carina M. Schlebusch & Mattias Jakobsson, Annual Review of Genomics and Human Genetics (2018), Vol. 9. Publication date - August 2018[/h]
[FONT=&quot]In the last three decades, genetic studies have played an increasingly important role in exploring human history. They have helped to conclusively establish that anatomically modern humans first appeared in Africa roughly 250,000–350,000 years before present and subsequently migrated to other parts of the world. The history of humans in Africa is complex and includes demographic events that influenced patterns of genetic variation across the continent. Through genetic studies, it has become evident that deep African population history is captured by relationships among African hunter–gatherers, as the world’s deepest population divergences occur among these groups, and that the deepest population divergence dates to 300,000 years before present. However, the spread of pastoralism and agriculture in the last few thousand years has shaped the geographic distribution of present-day Africans and their genetic diversity. With today’s sequencing technologies, we can obtain full genome sequences from diverse sets of extant and prehistoric Africans. The coming years will contribute exciting new insights toward deciphering human evolutionary history in Africa.

Sorry I'm a newbie, wasn't sure where to post this. Carlos Quiles has access to the preview of this paper on his blog.[/FONT]
 
Quoting from his preview -
"It is currently believed that farming practices in northeastern and eastern Africa developed independently in the Sahara/Sahel (around 7,000 BP) and the Ethiopian highlands (7,000–4,000 BP), while farming in the Nile River Valley developed as a consequence of the Neolithic Revolution in the Middle East (84). Northeastern and eastern African farmers today speak languages from the Afro-Asiatic and Nilo-Saharan linguistic groups, which is also reflected in their genetic affinities (Figure 3, K=6). In the northern parts of East Africa (South Sudan, Somalia, and Ethiopia), Nilo-Saharan and Afro-Asiatic speakers with farming lifeways have completely replaced hunter–gatherers. It is still largely unclear how farming and herding practices influenced the northeastern African prefarming population structure and whether the spread of farming is better explained by demic or cultural diffusion in this part of the world. Genetic studies of contemporary populations and aDNA have started to provide some insights into population continuity and incoming gene flow in this region of Africa.
 

T1a entered the horn of Africa via this.....Levant, NE Egypt, south Egypt, Eritrea then lastly the Horn via the DIR tribe of Somalia whose origins are from eritrea

You both, Maciamo and Sile are wrong.

Dir subclade is not found out of the Horn in Africa but only in the Arabian Peninsula. The branch of T1a found in Sahel is not closely related to those found in the Horn.

You should think it as separated expansion events. The Cushites and neighboring populations seems to belong to a different T1a branch. If this Cushitic branch is or is not related to those found in the Sahel, is not known yet. Also, you should understand that Egypt have several T1 subclades but not further South and further West (Sahel), that there is only two or three branches of T1a excluding T1b (which is completly absent).
 
Last edited:
Back
Top