Blood groups distribution in Europe - seems related to races

mihaitzateo

Regular Member
Messages
943
Reaction score
98
Points
0
Location
Bucharest
Ethnic group
Romanian
Y-DNA haplogroup
proly R1B
Hello all that you read this post,

I have seen the blood groups distribution in Europe.
First I have seen Jakub Marian map, which somehow is not so correct added the percentage for negative RH with positive RH.
Jakub Marian summed the percentages for 0+ with 0-, of A+ with A-, of B+ and B- and presented the results as percentages of A,B,0 .

Even like this, the map supports the Italo-Gaulish-Celtic common language and common genetic root.
It also seems current day Greeks are mostly descendants of Romans, because they have mostly 0 blood groups while Cyprus have mostly A.

Italians,Iberians,Celts from Britain,Netherlands,Belgium have mostly 0,as seen on the map.
Other Europeans have mostly A.
A marker of mixing to later Steppe people (maybe Neolithic Steppe People,or even more recent) and Asians is the percentage of B blood group.
Eastern Europeans have higher B group and also Fino-Ugrians.
Scandos, since they also mixed to Fino-Ugrians,have high B.
As you move Westwards, B group is very low.
It appears a clear distinction between Cyprus people and Turkey people,with Cyprus having lower B group.
Enough words and let the map speak:
https://jakubmarian.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/blood-type-europe.jpg
blood_groups.jpg
When looking in more detail at blood groups, taking both 0+,0-,A+,A-,B+,B-,AB the things become more,more interesting.
It seems that significant percentages of 0-,A- are present only at Caucasian races.
While B- seems to have originated in Pakistan and is also at some 3% in Russians,Estonians and other Eastern Europeans.
A- at percentages higher that 5% is found only in Europeans.
While 0- in percentages higher that 5% is found only in Caucasian races.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_distribution_by_country
@Maciamo to me is quite clear that is a strong correlation between ethnicity and blood groups distribution.
 
I must be a B+ because my mum is a B- and my dad is a B+


Sent from my iPad using Eupedia Forum
 
You might be interested in Iain Mathieson work comparing/parsing mutations--data of Finns and Europeans-- Non-Finns, EEF +HG+ Steppe populations Yamnaya like[blood type 40% +/-].
http://mathii.github.io/2017/09/21/blood-groups-in-ancient-europe
Great study!
So Steppe people had a lot of negative RH.
And Hunter Gatherers and Early Farmers had only A and 0,with 0 at higher percentages.
So it seems North Asians did not had B, B was brought from South Asia.
 
Interesting, I am 0- (universal donator, however I can only accept 0- blood).
You are R1b Arab with 0- blood group?
That is extremely interesting.
From what Arabic nation are you are?
Did you ever took an autosomal DNA test?
 
Me and my mom are AB- and my father is B+
 
Great study!
So Steppe people had a lot of negative RH.
And Hunter Gatherers and Early Farmers had only A and 0,with 0 at higher percentages.
So it seems North Asians did not had B, B was brought from South Asia.
Yes, we know they were A- higher percent than modern Europeans. They were probably a mix of white with predominantly bronze tan coloring, and had a gene that contributed to height.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_distribution_by_country
Blood group A is associated with high frequencies in Europe, especially in Scandinavia and Central Europe, although its highest frequencies occur in some Australian Aboriginal populations and the Blackfoot Indians of Montana, the US.[43][44]
. They also must have had a language that included the wheel since they traveled immense distances[using wheels and wagons], since the time period 5300YBP-4800YBP. For example using both of the interactive maps you can see the distance from Vucedol to Afanasievo is roughly 5000k+/- so they would have to adapt/interact to both environment and meeting new peoples/cultures.
Mikkel Nortoft--Mapping and programming by Mikkel Nørtoft. The technical functionalities of the timemap have been made with the generous help of Lê Nguyên Phương Thanh. The timebar is Jonathan Skeate’s Leaflet.timeline.
http://homeland.ku.dk/


iADKIZApzzVG4zdA-Region.png



https://umap.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/ancient-human-dna_41837#4/52.70/56.78
YMssyVmRply2932i-Region.png
 
A- at percentages higher that 5% is found only in Europeans.
While 0- in percentages higher that 5% is found only in Caucasian races.
@Maciamo to me is quite clear that is a strong correlation between ethnicity and blood groups distribution.
This is not correct. Two things:
Stay away from "races" as we are taught to separate people. Look at tribes, ethnic groups, but not in terms of "European", "African", "Hispanic" etc.
Also, it doesn't teach us much if we look at blood type frequencies based on nations.
What helps and teaches us is data from regions. And then finding out the reason why data can be extremely different within countries.
Take Chile for example:
I have seen 0.3 percent rh negatives in a region with mainly native tribes and one study with 23% rh negatives, 9% of that A-.
I am not sure what you consider "Caucasian", but there are frequencies of more than 5% O negatives in parts of Asia, Africa (certain Berber tribes according to LS) and people of Yoruba origin as well as a new study from Gambella, Ethiopia with more than 20% rh negatives.
http://www.rhesusnegative.net/staynegative/almost-20-rh-negatives-found-gambela-ethiopia/
As I have already mentioned Chile, there are other parts of South America high in rh negative blood. Brazil has 9% O- and 8% A- people.
http://rhesusnegative.net/themission/bloodtypefrequencies/
And then there is Al-Jouf Province of Saudi Arabia where around 29% are rh negative. There are a few other regions as well such as the Sinai Peninsula.
http://www.rhesusnegative.net/staynegative/regions-with-highest-rh-negative-percentages-2/
@Maciamo to me is quite clear that is a strong correlation between ethnicity and blood groups distribution.

I don't think Maciamo will agree with you there. But I will. But only in terms of researching haplogroup frequencies of ancient tribes and compare what high rh negative tribes have in common. I have been working on this for years and there is no end in sight. But the first thing you need to do is get rid of the continental mindset. :) And then it makes a ton of sense to see how the tribes have migrated over time.
Most people are reluctant to look at these things. But give it 5-10 years and it will be considered common knowledge. By then a lot of new research should be on the table.
 
Interesting. I have O- blood, along with 2 of my sisters, but my daughter and mother are both O+.
 
Great study!
So Steppe people had a lot of negative RH.
And Hunter Gatherers and Early Farmers had only A and 0,with 0 at higher percentages.
So it seems North Asians did not had B, B was brought from South Asia.

Interesting, i have some steppe and i´m A rh-.
 
Native what?

I test as part native american at ancestry. However my grandparent was saami, indigenous people of Scandinavia (at least its scandinavia now) I think that saami has strong similarity with native americans for some reason,since relatives of mine got the same result at ancestry.
 
I test as part native american at ancestry. However my grandparent was saami, indigenous people of Scandinavia (at least its scandinavia now) I think that saami has strong similarity with native americans for some reason,since relatives of mine got the same result at ancestry.
As far as I know, Rh negative blood was non-existent among native Americans and according to Cavalli-Sforza, the Sami of Norway and Finland have between 5 and 7% rh negatives amongst them which is not a lot.

https://www.rhesusnegative.net/staynegative/genetics/the-sami-or-saami/

However: 63% of the Sami are blood type A, which is huge.

On a sidenote, I hope someone here will be able to answer this questions:

https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threads/42784-The-Blood-Groups-of-the-Yamnaya
 
Eip6.jpg
i've found this interesting data about Blood type in Italy and it is clear that in North Italy is prevalent A+Blood type while in the South we have only 19% of A+ with O and even B having higher percentage than A+

This clearly shows Ancient Greeks as majority O+ like the majority of ancient Mediterranean Cultures
 
Unrelated to morphological snps or Y/Mt lineages, but have a distinct expression on different human lineages.
I m -O, Mother -O , father -A.
Father 100% North Italian, Mother Jewish,Iberian, French, German and Native(Pampean).
Maybe I received the haplotype from Natives and Rh factor from Iberians(partially).

Italians Grandparents A- and A+, Jew-Castizo grandpa O+ , Jew+MinorGerman grandma A-
 
I have written earlier about this topic, I dont remember where.

Rh-, I think came with some italo-celtic population with R1b and red hair

Blood group B was spread with satem population, with R1a Y-haplogroup, and blue eyes & blonde hairs, with balto-slavic and indo-iranian peoples.

Blood group A, must have spread with some paleo-balkanic (of course for IE origin), with haplogroups Ev13, J2b, and R1b-Z2103, and green eyes etc.
 
I have written earlier about this topic, I dont remember where.

Rh-, I think came with some italo-celtic population with R1b and red hair

Blood group B was spread with satem population, with R1a Y-haplogroup, and blue eyes & blonde hairs, with balto-slavic and indo-iranian peoples.

Blood group A, must have spread with some paleo-balkanic (of course for IE origin), with haplogroups Ev13, J2b, and R1b-Z2103, and green eyes etc.
No it didn't RH- isn't related to italy we are mostly RH+ A+ Indo European North Italians
 

This thread has been viewed 13022 times.

Back
Top