In this case the Y T Haplogroup is not the cause of a 1st Cousin, or any other close relation.
T1a1a (L208) and T1a2 (L131) are on a different branch of Tree (Ancient Relation).
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...-M184_tree.png
Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Ecology | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
![]() |
Someone, male, I don't know comes up at the top of my DNA Relatives list at 23andMe. He is predicted to be a first cousin. My Y haplogroup is T1a1a. His is listed as L-131, which I think is T1a2. We don't share any X, which I believe means we are paternal relatives. The Shared cM Project 3.0 tool v4 predicts any of these relationships:
- Great-Grandparent
- Great-Aunt / Uncle Half Aunt / Uncle
- 1C
- Half Niece / Nephew
- Great-Niece / Nephew
- Great-Grandchild
- Great-Great-Grandparent
- Great-Great-Aunt / Uncle
- Great-Great-Niece / Nephew
- Half Great-Aunt / Uncle
- Half Great-Niece / Nephew
- 1C1R
- Half 1C
I think it's pretty safe to rule out most of them except
- 1C
- Half Niece / Nephew
- 1C1R
- Half 1C
- Great-Niece / Nephew
My DNA test was with the V4 chip. So is it possible that we share a close and/or direct male ancestor if our T subclades are different? Or if my test were done with the V5 chip might it show I'm actually T1a2? Is that possible? I'm still learning about all this, all the more complicated as I find more DNA relatives, the results of the tests become more accurate, and many people include little to no information on their profiles.
In this case the Y T Haplogroup is not the cause of a 1st Cousin, or any other close relation.
T1a1a (L208) and T1a2 (L131) are on a different branch of Tree (Ancient Relation).
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikiped...-M184_tree.png
I thought it might be coincidence.
I have a guy on my mother's side who has the same haplogroup I have, and it's a really precise definition-R1a YP445, or R1a1a1b1a1b1d.
I think he actually is a paternal relative. He shares 4.6% and 2.3% DNA with two people who are unquestionably in my father's family... his grandson from his fling when he was 21 or 22, and the great-granddaughter of my father's sister, both of whom are high matches with me. This is getting pretty interesting. :)
on facebook ( T haplogroup ) Gareth Henson explains this "unstable SNP.......I will try to find it for you ....................ftdna might not be correct in placing it in the tree.
.
still looking......but the unstable SNP is Z19859 ...........according to Mr. Banks from Isogg, it comprises of 2 snp from T1a2 group....L131 and L454
I am positive for L131 , but negative for L454 .............that is my "instability" ................really do not know what Z19859 is for or is it necessary to be even in the T tree
ok...Mr. Henson said
Z19859 sits right in the middle of DYZ19 region which is harder to sequence. In Yfull one has a mixture of C and G reads.
haplogroup T2 ( Bhutan and armenia ) and T1a3 ( oldest origin in south Kazakhstan ) are clean of the SNP , while T1a1 and T1a2 have mixed reads for this.
So, Z19859 could be equal to M70 ..........Z19859 is over 16k years ago
.
.
Looked at mine in yFull, I am G to C on 88 reads
My maternal uncle/grandfather as T-CTS6507 stemming from T-M70 (T1a1).
Any information on this subclade?
We are Ashkenazi Jewish.