mount123
Regular Member
- Messages
- 993
- Reaction score
- 678
- Points
- 93
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- J2b-L283>Y126399
- mtDNA haplogroup
- J1c7a
No it doesnt mean that at it all. That is a logical non-sequitor. Regardless, here hamp doesn't even give an argument so not only can you not at all infer that he must therefore reject both, but you also don't have any argument as to why, so we are just supposed to take it on faith? Lets see his reasoning please?
I am 100% sure that if there was an Illyrian king called Burebista, and the Greek. Pistandros argument was made, it would be impossible for anyone to convince you guys it wasn't related to Albanian. Burrë. I have no doubt in my mind.
This one sided skepticism is totally cancerous.
Suddenly when something is thracian or dacian you all turn to rigorous and cautious scientists, but with any Illyrian name, even the most stretched possible parallel with Albanian is taken at face value.
Andros and Burrë have the exact same meaning, so this for me is interesting enough to merit mention. If i see argumentation why its wrong that makes sense, I will change my mind. It can be some coincidence, but to intentionally play dumb and ask to supress it is entirely disngenous.
Likewise the name of a Dacian king Diegis and the personal Dacian name Degis have been argued to be related with Albanian. Djeg
I think that a relation is possible here also. How distant this relation is I dont know, but some archaic calendar names (djegagur, digjepiq etc) and old toponyms like " kuji djegsinës, lugu djegsinës" . make me think this would have been used also in personal names also in antiquity.
I also find it odd that he points out supposed claims that Naissus is "Illyrian territory".