Ygorcs
Active member
- Messages
- 2,259
- Reaction score
- 812
- Points
- 0
- Ethnic group
- Multiracial Brazilian
How about various Europeans spreading simultaneously to the New World bringing similar plants and animals, technology, religion, etc but different languages? The Plains Indians are another interesting case, they were somewhat hemmed in but there were Algonquian, Siouan, Athabaskan, Kiowa-Tanoan, and Uto-Aztecan language families involved, I may be forgetting some - Salishan and Kutenai marginally participated - who converged to very similar lifestyles and material goods, shared religious practices, etc, after the horse was introduced. The Kiowa Apaches were a branch of the Kiowa who lived with them and were basically indistinguishable from them except that they spoke Apache, and then there were the Kiowa Comanches who lived with the Comanches but they spoke Kiowa. Almost if not entirely impossible to distinguish archaeologically even though it was only a few centuries ago.
Actually your example of the Plains Indians is also excellent for the pre-Columbian period. The Mississippian proto-civilization was almost certainly multilingual (not just multiple languages, but multiple language families), but they shared similar architecture, religion, political structure, social hierarchy, economy and many traditions even though they did form a reasonably interconnected zone that went way beyond mere economic trade, including significant political and religious interactions among different ethnicities who were linked by a common "way of life". But they still had many language families associated with the same general material culture, despite obvious distinctions that could still be identified on a regional basis. That is why I wonder if regional subcultures clearly distinguished from the others can be identified for Urnfield (and BB, too, since we already know autosomally different people had the same BB package). In the case of an expansionist culture, I think it is totally likely that some will shift to the foreign dominant language, some will not. Language was not always the main determiner of ethnic identity in the world.