Another Ad Hominem. Qué coño tienes contra mí? Do you think you are in possesion of truthness? LOL. You are as ignorant as most other people and I am sure you have done zero scientifical research. So, your opinions are based on what you have read in this forum and little else. As my opinions, but I don´t question yours.
What do you have to support your theory of the anatolian, greece as being the proxy for the concept of "East European"? Why not Ukrania? Support your affirmations and stop pursuing me.
I haven't a clue what you're talking about. There's a big problem when people can't really understand English or write it understandably, but I know it's a second or third language for some people, so I'll try to explain.
I actually do a lot of research, have done it all my life, not that you need to have done extensive research to understand that Eastern Mediterranean must have something to do with the Mediterranean Sea, and so when people use that phrase they generally mean ancestry from people who live or lived in proximity to the Mediterranean Sea.
How could you think that Eastern Europeans, i.e. Poles, Ukrainians, Russians, live in proximity to the Mediterranean Sea? Likewise, the Indo-Europeans lived on the Steppe. That's about as land-locked as you can get.
Now, do I think that's a "proper" genetics term? No, I don't. It's a term used by Davidski (and his followers) and to my knowledge he has never listed the specific groups which make up that component. I get the feeling that whichever group(s) are involved, you're not happy to be descended from them, but hey, you can take solace in the fact that they're junk calculators and not to be taken seriously.
Now, I've been nice about this. Next time there will be consequences.