Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Onge to whom he might have some additional affinities.
^^^ "Red Skin" Amerindian?
What is this statement based on?
I have made this recreation. I think they have done a good reconstruction, I have seen it working on it. The only thing that I think had given it a somewhat cannibalistic look and yet to my recreation I have seen more human aspects similar to modern man. His hair was graying gray and he could have had blue eyes or his children do not know, but he certainly did not have blue ones, it was rather that chestnut that looks red that would vary according to the light, there in the photo I was giving the light very fully it is understandable that they came out so red, poor man.
I uploaded him to DNA Land, let's see what was his coffee consumption etc. Here are his pigmentation SNPs:
https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threa...NA-analysis-reveals/page7?p=567964#post567964
I don't think he was "black" in a Sub-Saharan African way, rather something between "Pakistani" and "Dark Finn".
Dark Finn:
If Chad Rohlfsen (https://populationgenomics.blog) is right WHG might be a relatively complex admixture of Magdalenian on the one Hand and Anatolian + Gravettian + ANE + ENA on the other. This could explain the similarity to Finno-Ugrian groups who have additional Gravettian and ENA admixture from Siberia.
It would be interesting to investigate whether the HG admixture in Basques is more similar to Magdalenians.
DNA Land Ancestry Report for Cheddar Man:
For comparison, Steigen (Northern Norway hunter gatherer):
https://www.eupedia.com/forum/threa...unter-GEDmatch?p=568120&viewfull=1#post568120
The biggest surprise here is low IQ of the people in here who cannot grasp the whole Chedar man was black is clearly propaganda and has nothing to do with with facts or honest science. The GED match results show how black or paki this hunter gatherer survivor was, which is a big fat zero. His reconstruction is just ill intention fraud.
Cheddar man shares little DNA with modern English/Scots/Welsh. After him came Neolithic farmers of mediterranean appearance who wiped out the western hunter gatherers. After them came fairer, lighter skinned people from the steppes (who wiped out the earlier Neolithic farmers). Some of these later farmers had similar mtDNA to Cheddar man because they had mixed with relatives of the Western Hunter Gatherers on the Steppes
see Human Paleogenetics of Europe by Brandt G et al
and
Natural History museum 'ancient DNA shows migrants introduced farming to Britain from EU'
Interesting, that would make these results more understandable, but I still wonder why in the map Cheddar Man shows so more similarity with some populations much richer in WHG than in EHG than to populations like the Basques and Sardinians, with quite a lot of WHG for European standards (though not as much as the Baltic area). Is it possible that the fact that the non-WHG part is more ANF than anything else in Southern Europe, more distantly related than EHG, explains that? I'd be surprised if for instance the Basque WHG was more distant from Britain WHG than even EHG.
This thread has been viewed 23136 times.