Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
[h=4]Bell Beaker Poland 2500 BC[/h]
[h=4] I4251
[/h]
mtDNA: H1Y-DNA: R1b1a1a2
Shared DNA: (Sample Quality: 4)
1 SNP chain (min. 60 SNPs) / 2.96 cM
Largest chain: 233 SNPs / 2.96 cM
[h=6]You are the #2 top match to this sample!![]()
You are #2 among 110 other users who also have a deep dive match with this sample. This makes your relationship to this individual very unique. Full research for this sample is activated for you regardless of your access level. Touch the info button for more information.[/h]
[h=4]Relic French King Louis XVI 1793 AD[/h]
1. North Central Lombard (580 AD) ..... 7.12 -
Top 98 % match vs all users
Please note that this is not Louis XVI's DNA! He belonged to haplogroup R1b-U106, not G2a. This sample was mistakenly thought to belong to Louis XVI. So this sample is worthless and it is surprising that MyTrueAncestry used it.
I'm closer to this sample than 99 percent of the samples with 5 SNP chains, 51,93 cM, longest chain 13,77. So even if this is not the DNA of Louis XVI, I would be interested which persons DNA it is or could be? First question would be whether its authentic from the 18th century.
Vessel and relic may also be original, but certainly the biological sample examined is not from King Louis XVI. I'm pretty sure it's actually a northern Italian, perhaps from upper Lombardy or at least from neighboring areas. This in fact is his PCA. Which cannot be that of an individual like Louis XVI, who should instead be in another area of the map: he was 1/4 "French", while for the other 3/4 he was of German, Austrian and Polish origins.
If, on the other hand, it was possible to ascertain that that DNA belongs to the French ruler, then extramarital events should be considered in his genealogy.
![]()
Very informative, Stuvane.I never saw the autosomal results.
Hi, Angela.
With the various MTA upgrades you are enabled to examine their PCAs (both with ancient samples and with modern amps). And it is perhaps the most useful tool because many times MTA has the vice of labeling samples in a not very precise way.
BTW: new ancient specimens classified by MTA as "Ligurians" came out tonight, but - on closer inspection with Pax - they are actually semi-Iberian people...:wary2:
Vessel and relic may also be original, but certainly the biological sample examined is not from King Louis XVI. I'm pretty sure it's actually a northern Italian, perhaps from upper Lombardy or at least from neighboring areas. This in fact is his PCA. Which cannot be that of an individual like Louis XVI, who should instead be in another area of the map: he was 1/4 "French", while for the other 3/4 he was of German, Austrian and Polish origins.
If, on the other hand, it was possible to ascertain that that DNA belongs to the French ruler, then extramarital events should be considered in his genealogy
Hi, Angela.
With the various MTA upgrades you are enabled to examine their PCAs (both with ancient samples and with modern amps). And it is perhaps the most useful tool because many times MTA has the vice of labeling samples in a not very precise way.
BTW: new ancient specimens classified by MTA as "Ligurians" came out tonight, but - on closer inspection with Pax - they are actually semi-Iberian people...:wary2:
Hi, Angela.
With the various MTA upgrades you are enabled to examine their PCAs (both with ancient samples and with modern amps). And it is perhaps the most useful tool because many times MTA has the vice of labeling samples in a not very precise way.
BTW: new ancient specimens classified by MTA as "Ligurians" came out tonight, but - on closer inspection with Pax - they are actually semi-Iberian people...:wary2:
If you read ancient texts, they state iberians where only from modern Valencia and north through catalonia and into france to the rhone river france, across the river where the ligurians ..........the gauls invaded southern france from the north to split these people................so Iberians and Ligurians where once neighbours
Closest population distances
[h=3]Population[/h] [h=3]Distance[/h] [h=4]CL63_Alpine[/h] [h=4]1.311841[/h] [h=4]SZ42_Longobard[/h] [h=4]1.467153[/h] [h=4]SZ24_Longobard[/h] [h=4]1.539133[/h] [h=4]SZ5_Pannonian[/h] [h=4]1.563197[/h] [h=4]IA_Britain_York_3DRIF16[/h] [h=4]1.564585[/h] [h=4]BA_Hungary_BR2[/h] [h=4]1.608408[/h] [h=4]Baiuvarii_Germanic_BIM_33[/h] [h=4]1.654276[/h] [h=4]SZ15_Longobard[/h] [h=4]1.661574[/h]
![]()
Does anyone know who this woman is and where she is from?
It appears in some of my deep dives but it doesn't ring a bell, I don't know who it is.
![]()
Does anyone know who this woman is and where she is from?
It appears in some of my deep dives but it doesn't ring a bell, I don't know who it is.
She’s an Hellenic Roman
![]()
![]()
Does anyone know who this woman is and where she is from?
It appears in some of my deep dives but it doesn't ring a bell, I don't know who it is.
Portrait identified as that of Galla Placida. But there's no certainty that it was really her portrait.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galla_Placidia
This thread has been viewed 1264173 times.