Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Page 20 of 152 FirstFirst ... 1018192021223070120 ... LastLast
Results 476 to 500 of 3786

Thread: Mytrueancestry.com

  1. #476
    Regular Member Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    5,379

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - SK1480
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States

    Quote Originally Posted by Duarte View Post
    Something. Maybe can help you, I don’t know:

    Hungary EN/NE:
    NE1 Polgár-Ferenci-hát, Hungary F999937 F U5b2c 5070-5310 cal BC Ancient NE1 Matches living people
    NE5 Kompolt - Kigyósér, Hungary F999927 M C-F3393 J1c 4990-5210 cal BC Ancient Hungarian Genome NE5 Analysis
    NE6 Apc-Berekalja I., Hungary F999932 M C-P255 K1a3a3 4950-5300 cal BC Analysis of Hungarian genome-NE6
    NE7 Apc-Berekalja I., Hungary F999928 M I-L1228 N1a 4360-4490 cal BC Ancient Hungarian

    RISE423, Armenia MBA (1402–1211 BC), M930063
    1 Georgian_Jew + Kabardin + Tabassaran + Tabassaran @ 3.223544

    I1656, Armenia MLBA (1501–1402 BC), M182163
    1 Azeri_Dagestan + Dargin_Urkarah + Greek_Smyrna + Kurd @ 5.455067

    BELL BEAKER:
    I0806 Bell Beaker, Quedlinburg, Germany (2431-2150 BC)
    Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1a2a1a2a-DF27
    GEDmatch Kit Number: T253390

    And this:

    RISE563 Bell Beaker, Osterhofen-Altenmarkt, Germany
    Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1a2a1a2b-U152
    GEDmatch Kit Number: T644357

    British Roman Era:
    Hinxton-4
    Cambridgshire, UK
    F999925
    M
    R-DF25
    H1ag1
    2000 years

    Tyrolean Iceman is Ötzi. No Kit available in GEDmatch.

    Thank you Duarte. :)

    too bad there isn't any Ötzi Kit, it would have been very interesting running a 1/1 Comparison with the Iceman.

  2. #477
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos View Post


    In this case above is my hidden kit and the old man's kit. In his example are his two kits.
    Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
    limit. (Leave blank for default
    mismatch eval window / 2)
    In this box I have put 0.1
    I not know what happened dear friend, but the results are not consistent. They indicate that the Celtic is their identical twin. Check out chromosome 1 and you'll find that there are much more regions where there are no mach in the top row (red color), than regions with where there are match (green color). The bottom bar could not be all blue, indicating a complete match of your chromosome with the Celtic’s chromosome. Even if, by hypothesis, we admit that the algorithm is correct, the final result is very far from anything that could be called logic. Just to reason by extremes: It's the same as saying that you're a clone of the Celtic man. Something went very wrong. What was, I do not know. Big hug my dear friend. Try to run again leaving all boxes blank or just fill with the number 1 only the box that requests the minimum size that should be considered in centimeters, otherwise the number 7 will be selected automatically.

  3. #478
    Regular Member Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    5,379

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - SK1480
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States

    From MDLP k11
    1 Armenia_MLBA + Bell_Beaker + British_Roman + Tyrolean_Iceman_EN @ 2.321840

    maybe he’s the Brits-Roman as above:

    Kit F999925 (Hinxton-4, UK, 2ky)

    Precision: 30.0
    cM threshold: 1.0
    Maximum cM: No Limit
    Gap threshold: 2.0 cm's
    All SNPs used.

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    1 9,510,150 10,484,416 162 1.16 31.0
    1 35,373,374 36,789,546 166 1.18 40.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    2 148,453,079 149,858,734 192 1.32 18.0
    2 219,187,603 219,912,758 139 1.26 17.0
    2 239,211,380 239,638,300 122 1.33 5.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    3 25,548,555 26,258,075 146 1.06 16.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    4 33,116,246 34,534,283 133 1.05 20.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    5 4,803,549 5,161,189 125 1.30 6.0
    5 74,328,068 74,988,369 116 1.24 2.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    7 6,213,396 7,129,858 140 1.43 6.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    11 19,057,767 19,427,092 141 1.25 10.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    12 946,878 1,524,144 118 1.48 0.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    15 65,564,595 66,333,100 120 1.13 7.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    16 5,628,300 5,848,496 121 1.02 3.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    17 13,801,591 14,110,852 125 1.65 5.0
    17 75,761,949 76,160,881 114 1.33 5.0

    Total cM: 20.21
    Largest segment cM: 1.65
    Total segments: 16
    Total gap-induced breaks: 0
    Top 10 Q scores:
    Q-score: 40.00
    Q-score: 31.00
    Q-score: 20.00
    Q-score: 18.00
    Q-score: 17.00
    Q-score: 16.00
    Q-score: 10.00
    Q-score: 7.00
    Q-score: 6.00
    Q-score: 5.00

  4. #479
    Regular Member zanipolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    22-03-11
    Posts
    2,071

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    K1a4o

    Ethnic group
    Down Under
    Country: Australia

    Can you remove one of your samples and add another one

  5. #480
    Regular Member Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    5,379

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - SK1480
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States

    Quote Originally Posted by zanipolo View Post
    Can you remove one of your samples and add another one
    ... Who’re you talking to?


  6. #481
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by Salento View Post
    From MDLP k11
    1 Armenia_MLBA + Bell_Beaker + British_Roman + Tyrolean_Iceman_EN @ 2.321840

    maybe he’s the Brits-Roman as above:

    Kit F999925 (Hinxton-4, UK, 2ky)

    Precision: 30.0
    cM threshold: 1.0
    Maximum cM: No Limit
    Gap threshold: 2.0 cm's
    All SNPs used.

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    1 9,510,150 10,484,416 162 1.16 31.0
    1 35,373,374 36,789,546 166 1.18 40.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    2 148,453,079 149,858,734 192 1.32 18.0
    2 219,187,603 219,912,758 139 1.26 17.0
    2 239,211,380 239,638,300 122 1.33 5.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    3 25,548,555 26,258,075 146 1.06 16.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    4 33,116,246 34,534,283 133 1.05 20.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    5 4,803,549 5,161,189 125 1.30 6.0
    5 74,328,068 74,988,369 116 1.24 2.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    7 6,213,396 7,129,858 140 1.43 6.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    11 19,057,767 19,427,092 141 1.25 10.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    12 946,878 1,524,144 118 1.48 0.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    15 65,564,595 66,333,100 120 1.13 7.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    16 5,628,300 5,848,496 121 1.02 3.0

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n SNPs Centimorgans (cM) Q
    17 13,801,591 14,110,852 125 1.65 5.0
    17 75,761,949 76,160,881 114 1.33 5.0

    Total cM: 20.21
    Largest segment cM: 1.65
    Total segments: 16
    Total gap-induced breaks: 0
    Top 10 Q scores:
    Q-score: 40.00
    Q-score: 31.00
    Q-score: 20.00
    Q-score: 18.00
    Q-score: 17.00
    Q-score: 16.00
    Q-score: 10.00
    Q-score: 7.00
    Q-score: 6.00
    Q-score: 5.00
    There are many match of an ancient British with a modern Italian. It is really possible that this Breton has DNA from the Italian peninsula, or vice versa, it is really possible that you have Breton blood, and this second hypothesis is more plausible if we consider that Romanized Bretons may have gone to Italy in the Roman period.

  7. #482
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by zanipolo View Post
    Can you remove one of your samples and add another one

    Quote Originally Posted by Salento View Post
    ... Who’re you talking to?


    Hello Salento.
    I believe zanipolo is referring to the post below, and not to your post :)


    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos View Post


    In this case above is my hidden kit and the old man's kit. In his example are his two kits.
    Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
    limit. (Leave blank for default
    mismatch eval window / 2)
    In this box I have put 0.1

  8. #483
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by Carlos View Post


    In this case above is my hidden kit and the old man's kit. In his example are his two kits.
    Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
    limit. (Leave blank for default
    mismatch eval window / 2)
    In this box I have put 0.1




    Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
    limit. (Leave blank for default
    mismatch eval window / 2)
    0.1

    Do not do it the way above, Carlos:
    Field should be blank.
    If You do so, the result will be the same highlighted below, my Kit with LBK Stuttgart. Genesis would do the same with any other old sample:

    Kit [FTDNA] and F999916 (LBK, Stuttgart, 7ky) [GEDmatch Xfer]

    Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs
    Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 7.0 cM
    Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment.


    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs
    1 752,566 13,176,463 29.1 3,190
    1 13,775,122 120,526,982 120.0 24,229
    1 149,815,536 249,198,060 128.6 23,293

    (...)

    Chr B37 Start Pos'n B37 End Pos'n Centimorgans (cM) SNPs
    22 17,073,066 51,181,759 79.9 8,899

    Largest segment = 151.8 cM

    Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 3559.7 cM (99.255 Pct)
    Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 1.0

    46 shared segments found for this comparison.

    607322 SNPs used for this comparison.

    54.700 Pct SNPs are full identical

    Comparison took 0.359 seconds.
    CPU time used: 0.060 cpu seconds.

  9. #484
    Regular Member zanipolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    22-03-11
    Posts
    2,071

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    K1a4o

    Ethnic group
    Down Under
    Country: Australia

    Quote Originally Posted by Salento View Post
    ... Who’re you talking to?

    can you remove a sample in trueancestry and place another person if you have paid for more than the free test

    i have my grandfather and my father......i want to remove my grandfather and test my sample

  10. #485
    Regular Member Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    5,379

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - SK1480
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States

    Quote Originally Posted by zanipolo View Post
    can you remove a sample in trueancestry and place another person if you have paid for more than the free test

    i have my grandfather and my father......i want to remove my grandfather and test my sample
    Yes you can.

    Delete your Grandfather, and upload your Raw-Data. Wait for your results.

    After that, if you want, delete your data, and put back your Grandfather again.

    Somehow the Site works better with Chrome (browser) on my PC.

    i also think they’re updating the site.

  11. #486
    Regular Member zanipolo's Avatar
    Join Date
    22-03-11
    Posts
    2,071

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    K1a4o

    Ethnic group
    Down Under
    Country: Australia

    Quote Originally Posted by zanipolo View Post
    my grandfather's result
    .
    .
    Gaul + Gallo-Roman (4.866)
    Gaul + Thracian (5.522)
    Gaul (8.086)
    Gallo-Roman (8.595)
    Thracian (8.85)
    .
    .
    .
    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
    1. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (8.086) - [Upgrade for more details]
    2. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (8.595) - [Upgrade for more details]
    3. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (8.602) - [Upgrade for more details]
    4. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (8.85) - [Upgrade for more details]
    5. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (8.85) - [Upgrade for more details]
    6. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (8.857) - [Upgrade for more details]
    7. Central Roman (670 AD) (9.77) - [Upgrade for more details]
    8. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (10.44) - [Upgrade for more details]
    9. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (10.66) - [Upgrade for more details]
    10. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (10.93) - [Upgrade for more details]
    11. Central Roman (590 AD) (11.0) - [Upgrade for more details]
    12. Central Roman (590 AD) (11.04) - [Upgrade for more details]
    13. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (11.32) - [Upgrade for more details]
    14. Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (12.1) - [Upgrade for more details]
    15. Medieval Frank (670 AD) (12.44) - [Upgrade for more details]
    16. Central Roman (590 AD) (12.46) - [Upgrade for more details]
    17. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (12.53) - [Upgrade for more details]
    18. Roman Soldier Germany (300 BC) (13.59) - [Upgrade for more details]
    19. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (13.69) - [Upgrade for more details]
    20. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (13.77) - [Upgrade for more details]
    21. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (14.48) - [Upgrade for more details]
    22. Hellenic Roman (670 AD) (17.72) - [Upgrade for more details]
    23. Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany (300 BC) (19.04) - [Upgrade for more details]
    24. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (19.25) - [Upgrade for more details]
    25. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (19.26) - [Upgrade for more details]
    26. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (19.34) - [Upgrade for more details]
    27. Alemannic Bavaria (450 AD) (19.67) - [Upgrade for more details]
    28. Central Roman / Mixed (590 AD) (20.03) - [Upgrade for more details]
    29. Gepid / Goth (450 AD) (20.11) - [Upgrade for more details]
    30. Hellenic Roman (590 AD) (20.13) - [Upgrade for more details]
    31. Celt / Hungary (590 AD) (20.95) - [Upgrade for more details]
    32. Gaulic Gladiator York (250 AD) (21.09) - [Upgrade for more details]
    33. Halstatt (775 BC) (21.17) - [Upgrade for more details]
    34. Czech Velke Prilepy (0 AD) (21.32) - [Upgrade for more details]
    35. Bell Beaker Poland (2500 BC) (21.53) - [Upgrade for more details]
    36. Mycenaean (1350 BC) (22.21) - [Upgrade for more details]
    37. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (22.42) - [Upgrade for more details]
    38. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (22.5) - [Upgrade for more details]
    39. Scythian Ukraine (600 BC) (22.76) - [Upgrade for more details]
    40. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (22.87) - [Upgrade for more details]
    .
    .
    only 1 deep dive
    .
    Alemannic Bavaria
    450 AD
    Total cM=29.71
    Largest segment=9.05 cM (4 shared)
    grandfather above and mine below
    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
    1. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (8.252) - [Upgrade for more details]
    2. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (8.921) - [Upgrade for more details]
    3. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (9.498) - [Upgrade for more details]
    4. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (9.723) - [Upgrade for more details]
    5. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (9.779) - [Upgrade for more details]
    6. Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (10.35) - [Upgrade for more details]
    7. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (11.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
    8. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (11.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
    9. Central Roman (670 AD) (12.07) - [Upgrade for more details]
    10. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (12.14) - [Upgrade for more details]
    11. Medieval Frank (670 AD) (12.81) - [Upgrade for more details]
    12. Central Roman (590 AD) (12.95) - [Upgrade for more details]
    13. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (13.2) - [Upgrade for more details]
    14. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (13.26) - [Upgrade for more details]
    15. Central Roman (590 AD) (13.43) - [Upgrade for more details]
    16. Central Roman (590 AD) (13.71) - [Upgrade for more details]
    17. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (13.83) - [Upgrade for more details]
    18. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (14.31) - [Upgrade for more details]
    19. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (15.0) - [Upgrade for more details]
    20. Roman Soldier Germany (300 BC) (15.09) - [Upgrade for more details]
    21. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (15.13) - [Upgrade for more details]
    22. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (17.79) - [Upgrade for more details]
    23. Hellenic Roman (670 AD) (18.69) - [Upgrade for more details]
    24. Celt / Hungary (590 AD) (19.96) - [Upgrade for more details]
    25. Scythian Ukraine (600 BC) (20.01) - [Upgrade for more details]
    26. Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany (300 BC) (20.08) - [Upgrade for more details]
    27. Alemannic Bavaria (450 AD) (20.16) - [Upgrade for more details]
    28. Gaulic Gladiator York (250 AD) (20.24) - [Upgrade for more details]
    29. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (20.39) - [Upgrade for more details]
    30. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (20.46) - [Upgrade for more details]
    31. Bell Beaker Scotland (2145 BC) (20.69) - [Upgrade for more details]
    32. Bell Beaker Poland (2500 BC) (20.79) - [Upgrade for more details]
    33. Hungary Iron Age (800 BC) (20.8) - [Upgrade for more details]
    34. Czech Velke Prilepy (0 AD) (21.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
    35. Gepid / Goth (450 AD) (21.78) - [Upgrade for more details]
    36. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (22.24) - [Upgrade for more details]
    37. Halstatt (775 BC) (22.36) - [Upgrade for more details]
    38. Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (22.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
    39. Central Roman / Mixed (590 AD) (23.02) - [Upgrade for more details]
    40. Crete Armenoi (1370 BC) (23.32) - [Upgrade for more details]
    .
    .
    deep dive
    Alemannic Bavaria
    450 AD
    Total cM=10.82
    Largest segment=5.56 cM (5 shared. Sample quality: 9)

    .
    .
    Illyrian / Dalmatia
    1200 BC
    Total cM=1.66
    Largest segment=1.66 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 40)


    .................................................. .................................

    my father was updated to

    Roman + Illyrian (4.913)
    Gallo-Roman + Roman (6.367)
    Gallo-Roman (7.349)
    Illyrian (7.471)
    Roman (9.665)


    ..
    Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany
    300 BC
    Total cM=4.36
    Largest segment=4.36 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 81)
    .
    Mycenaean
    1350 BC
    Total cM=1.83
    Largest segment=1.83 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 9)
    .
    Germano-Celtic Gladiator York
    250 AD
    Total cM=1.24
    Largest segment=1.24 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 18)

  12. #487
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    For general knowledge:

    MyTrueAncestry.com has changed the "Deep Dive" functionality algorithm and the numbers that are now appearing look more realistic. I recommend everyone to review their numbers since they are probably going to be downgraded in "Deep Dive". Look at my case.

    Before:




    Now:




  13. #488
    Regular Member Lukas's Avatar
    Join Date
    23-04-17
    Posts
    293


    Country: Poland

    Quote Originally Posted by Duarte View Post
    For general knowledge:

    MyTrueAncestry.com has changed the "Deep Dive" functionality algorithm and the numbers that are now appearing look more realistic. I recommend everyone to review their numbers since they are probably going to be downgraded in "Deep Dive". Look at my case.


    So Duarte.... who was right since the begining?:) Even Mytruancestry now finally must reduce cM values and must admit they were utterly wrong:)

    But still some of those values are somewhat too big, unless they checked them in lowest treshold on something like Gedmatch one-to-one tool.



    Also I'm interested how they explain their total fail with those very high matches? Of course it isn't question to Duarte, but general.

  14. #489
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by mlukas View Post
    So Duarte.... who was right since the begining?:) Even Mytruancestry now finally must reduce cM values and must admit they were utterly wrong:)

    But still some of those values are somewhat too big, unless they checked them in lowest treshold on something like Gedmatch one-to-one tool.



    Also I'm interested how they explain their total fail with those very high matches? Of course it isn't question to Duarte, but general.
    Hello mlukas,

    I'm not acknowledging that you're 100% correct. As you yourself say, in your understanding, matches are still very high. They have corrected the algorithm and now the results are more consistent with Genesis GEDmach in the default selections. In that sense, if they should explain, Genesis GEDmatch should also :)

    Big hug and have a nice weekend

  15. #490
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    My case.
    MyTrueAncestry.com X Genesis GEDmatch:




  16. #491
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    20,627


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York

    @MLukas,
    It would be very nice if you re-uploaded all the Collegno and Szolad samples which you removed. Thanks in advance.

    It still remains to be explained by someone at gedmatch why we get such incredibly high matches with really old samples like Loschbour, LBK, NE1, BR2, and others.

    The fact that mytrueancestry made such an egregious error is concerning, as is the fact it all seems to be based on work by Eurogenes, which is always suspect until proven otherwise imho. (On the K15 upon which it seems to be based my closest fits are a 5 and a 6, perhaps the worst fits I've ever gotten on any calculator, and I know my ancestry for the last 500 years at least. MDLP is much better.)

    I'll stick with my free version even if it's just for fun.


    Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci

  17. #492
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    There are two new functionalities in MyTrueAncestry.com: The "Deep Dive Euro Map" and the "Deep Dive Asia Map".
    Also, data in the Archaelogical Maps (Europe and Asia), was actualizized.
    See some of my data below. I recomend that all who payed for the service, do the same.











  18. #493
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    02-02-19
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    291


    Ethnic group
    Northern European
    Country: United States



    Seems to be a slight change from the new update at the bottom:


  19. #494
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by matty74 View Post


    Seems to be a slight change from the new update at the bottom:

    In your case the mainly matches are with more recent samples (1600 AD and 1000 AD, high quality: 89). The quality of sample Bell Beaker (2050 BC ) is 35, much more low. Big Hug :)

  20. #495
    Regular Member Lukas's Avatar
    Join Date
    23-04-17
    Posts
    293


    Country: Poland

    Quote Originally Posted by Angela View Post
    @MLukas,
    It would be very nice if you re-uploaded all the Collegno and Szolad samples which you removed. Thanks in advance.
    .
    I removed them few months ago because as there didn't have full snps number they were marked as damaged by Gedmatch after migration to Genesis.

    Uploading all takes much time. Maybe just upload those which are most popular in people results?

  21. #496
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    E-Mail received now from MyAncestry.com:


  22. #497
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    20,627


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York

    Quote Originally Posted by mlukas View Post
    I removed them few months ago because as there didn't have full snps number they were marked as damaged by Gedmatch after migration to Genesis.

    Uploading all takes much time. Maybe just upload those which are most popular in people results?
    Thank you for your response, MLukas.

    Anything you can do would be great. :)

  23. #498
    Regular Member Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    5,379

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 - SK1480
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States

    Deep-Dive Map:


    Archaeological Map:


    Premium Map:

  24. #499
    Regular Member Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Posts
    2,254

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-DF27/R-Y45921

    Country: Brazil

    Quote Originally Posted by Salento View Post
    Deep-Dive Map:


    Archaeological Map:


    Premium Map:
    ILLYRIAM/DALMATIA 1200 BC - I1333 - Genesis GEDmatch - mine:




    THRACIAN BULGARIA 450 BC - I5769 - Genesis GEDmatch - mine:




  25. #500
    Advisor Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Posts
    6,871

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1b2a2a
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b7

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    Living DNA still shows the most results, despite having the least SNPs of all the raw data versions I have. While my Superkit in Ancestry format, has the most, and only shows a modest amount of results. Perhaps because the amount of SNPs being used fills out more information, and more correctly shows what my actual results should be with this calculator? I don't think more results on the map necessarily indicate that it is more accurate. Idk But I do know more SNPs should yield more information. It is either the other ones a false matches being assigned to various samples, that is fleshed out more with more SNPs. Many of samples I get were all influenced and overlap with the Anatolian copper-age, so I can see how it (or any calculator really) could mistakenly assign those samples. Or the format in Living DNA just works better this calculator.

    Ancestry by itself shows more results on the map, but the Superkit, in the same format shows slightly less. So perhaps that now that it has more SNPs to go by, it more correctly assigns the samples. Nevertheless, in 23andme format, it shows nothing, so format of the raw data is definitely a factor.

    Oddly, my brother, and mother's 23andme raw data show about as much on their map, as my Living DNA kit does. They're using the same version as me.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •