Mytrueancestry.com

**Salento** · 03-05-19, 03:14

Originally Posted by Duarte

Something. Maybe can help you, I don’t know:

Hungary EN/NE:

NE1	Polgár-Ferenci-hát, Hungary	F999937	F		U5b2c	5070-5310 cal BC	Ancient NE1 Matches living people
NE5	Kompolt - Kigyósér, Hungary	F999927	M	C-F3393	J1c	4990-5210 cal BC	Ancient Hungarian Genome NE5 Analysis
NE6	Apc-Berekalja I., Hungary	F999932	M	C-P255	K1a3a3	4950-5300 cal BC	Analysis of Hungarian genome-NE6
NE7	Apc-Berekalja I., Hungary	F999928	M	I-L1228	N1a	4360-4490 cal BC	Ancient Hungarian

RISE423, Armenia MBA (1402–1211 BC), M930063
1 Georgian_Jew + Kabardin + Tabassaran + Tabassaran @ 3.223544

I1656, Armenia MLBA (1501–1402 BC), M182163
1 Azeri_Dagestan + Dargin_Urkarah + Greek_Smyrna + Kurd @ 5.455067

BELL BEAKER:
I0806 Bell Beaker, Quedlinburg, Germany (2431-2150 BC)
Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1a2a1a2a-DF27
GEDmatch Kit Number: T253390

And this:

RISE563 Bell Beaker, Osterhofen-Altenmarkt, Germany
Y-DNA Haplogroup: R1b1a1a2a1a2b-U152
GEDmatch Kit Number: T644357

British Roman Era:
Hinxton-4
Cambridgshire, UK
F999925
M
R-DF25
H1ag1
2000 years

Tyrolean Iceman is Ötzi. No Kit available in GEDmatch.

Thank you Duarte. :)

too bad there isn't any Ötzi Kit, it would have been very interesting running a 1/1 Comparison with the Iceman.

**Duarte** · 03-05-19, 03:52

Originally Posted by Carlos

In this case above is my hidden kit and the old man's kit. In his example are his two kits.

Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
limit. (Leave blank for default
mismatch eval window / 2)

In this box I have put 0.1

I not know what happened dear friend, but the results are not consistent. They indicate that the Celtic is their identical twin. Check out chromosome 1 and you'll find that there are much more regions where there are no mach in the top row (red color), than regions with where there are match (green color). The bottom bar could not be all blue, indicating a complete match of your chromosome with the Celtic’s chromosome. Even if, by hypothesis, we admit that the algorithm is correct, the final result is very far from anything that could be called logic. Just to reason by extremes: It's the same as saying that you're a clone of the Celtic man. Something went very wrong. What was, I do not know. Big hug my dear friend. Try to run again leaving all boxes blank or just fill with the number 1 only the box that requests the minimum size that should be considered in centimeters, otherwise the number 7 will be selected automatically.

**Salento** · 03-05-19, 04:03

From MDLP k11
1 Armenia_MLBA + Bell_Beaker + British_Roman + Tyrolean_Iceman_EN @ 2.321840

maybe he’s the Brits-Roman as above:

Kit F999925 (Hinxton-4, UK, 2ky)

Precision: 30.0
cM threshold: 1.0
Maximum cM: No Limit
Gap threshold: 2.0 cm's
All SNPs used.

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
1	9,510,150	10,484,416	162	1.16	31.0
1	35,373,374	36,789,546	166	1.18	40.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
2	148,453,079	149,858,734	192	1.32	18.0
2	219,187,603	219,912,758	139	1.26	17.0
2	239,211,380	239,638,300	122	1.33	5.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
3	25,548,555	26,258,075	146	1.06	16.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
4	33,116,246	34,534,283	133	1.05	20.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
5	4,803,549	5,161,189	125	1.30	6.0
5	74,328,068	74,988,369	116	1.24	2.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
7	6,213,396	7,129,858	140	1.43	6.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
11	19,057,767	19,427,092	141	1.25	10.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
12	946,878	1,524,144	118	1.48	0.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
15	65,564,595	66,333,100	120	1.13	7.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
16	5,628,300	5,848,496	121	1.02	3.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
17	13,801,591	14,110,852	125	1.65	5.0
17	75,761,949	76,160,881	114	1.33	5.0

Total cM: 20.21
Largest segment cM: 1.65
Total segments: 16
Total gap-induced breaks: 0
Top 10 Q scores:
Q-score: 40.00
Q-score: 31.00
Q-score: 20.00
Q-score: 18.00
Q-score: 17.00
Q-score: 16.00
Q-score: 10.00
Q-score: 7.00
Q-score: 6.00
Q-score: 5.00

**zanipolo** · 03-05-19, 05:32

Can you remove one of your samples and add another one

**Salento** · 03-05-19, 05:45

Originally Posted by zanipolo

Can you remove one of your samples and add another one

... Who’re you talking to?

**Duarte** · 03-05-19, 11:09

Originally Posted by Salento

From MDLP k11
1 Armenia_MLBA + Bell_Beaker + British_Roman + Tyrolean_Iceman_EN @ 2.321840

maybe he’s the Brits-Roman as above:

Kit F999925 (Hinxton-4, UK, 2ky)

Precision: 30.0
cM threshold: 1.0
Maximum cM: No Limit
Gap threshold: 2.0 cm's
All SNPs used.

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
1	9,510,150	10,484,416	162	1.16	31.0
1	35,373,374	36,789,546	166	1.18	40.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
2	148,453,079	149,858,734	192	1.32	18.0
2	219,187,603	219,912,758	139	1.26	17.0
2	239,211,380	239,638,300	122	1.33	5.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
3	25,548,555	26,258,075	146	1.06	16.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
4	33,116,246	34,534,283	133	1.05	20.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
5	4,803,549	5,161,189	125	1.30	6.0
5	74,328,068	74,988,369	116	1.24	2.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
7	6,213,396	7,129,858	140	1.43	6.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
11	19,057,767	19,427,092	141	1.25	10.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
12	946,878	1,524,144	118	1.48	0.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
15	65,564,595	66,333,100	120	1.13	7.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
16	5,628,300	5,848,496	121	1.02	3.0

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	SNPs	Centimorgans (cM)	Q
17	13,801,591	14,110,852	125	1.65	5.0
17	75,761,949	76,160,881	114	1.33	5.0

Total cM: 20.21
Largest segment cM: 1.65
Total segments: 16
Total gap-induced breaks: 0
Top 10 Q scores:
Q-score: 40.00
Q-score: 31.00
Q-score: 20.00
Q-score: 18.00
Q-score: 17.00
Q-score: 16.00
Q-score: 10.00
Q-score: 7.00
Q-score: 6.00
Q-score: 5.00

There are many match of an ancient British with a modern Italian. It is really possible that this Breton has DNA from the Italian peninsula, or vice versa, it is really possible that you have Breton blood, and this second hypothesis is more plausible if we consider that Romanized Bretons may have gone to Italy in the Roman period.

**Duarte** · 03-05-19, 12:37

Originally Posted by zanipolo

Can you remove one of your samples and add another one

Originally Posted by Salento

... Who’re you talking to?

Hello Salento.
I believe zanipolo is referring to the post below, and not to your post :)

Originally Posted by Carlos

In this case above is my hidden kit and the old man's kit. In his example are his two kits.

Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
limit. (Leave blank for default
mismatch eval window / 2)

In this box I have put 0.1

**Duarte** · 03-05-19, 13:50

Originally Posted by Carlos

In this case above is my hidden kit and the old man's kit. In his example are his two kits.

Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching
limit. (Leave blank for default
mismatch eval window / 2)

In this box I have put 0.1

Size (in SNPs) of Mismatch-Bunching limit. (Leave blank for default mismatch eval window / 2)	0.1

Do not do it the way above, Carlos:
Field should be blank.
If You do so, the result will be the same highlighted below, my Kit with LBK Stuttgart. Genesis would do the same with any other old sample:

Kit [FTDNA] and F999916 (LBK, Stuttgart, 7ky) [GEDmatch Xfer]

Segment threshold size will be adjusted dynamically between 200 and 400 SNPs
Minimum segment cM to be included in total = 7.0 cM
Mismatch-bunching Limit will be adjusted dynamically to 60 percent of the segment threshold size for any given segment.

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	Centimorgans (cM)	SNPs
1	752,566	13,176,463	29.1	3,190
1	13,775,122	120,526,982	120.0	24,229
1	149,815,536	249,198,060	128.6	23,293

(...)

Chr	B37 Start Pos'n	B37 End Pos'n	Centimorgans (cM)	SNPs
22	17,073,066	51,181,759	79.9	8,899

Largest segment = 151.8 cM

Total Half-Match segments (HIR) = 3559.7 cM (99.255 Pct)
Estimated number of generations to MRCA = 1.0

46 shared segments found for this comparison.

607322 SNPs used for this comparison.

54.700 Pct SNPs are full identical

Comparison took 0.359 seconds.
CPU time used: 0.060 cpu seconds.

**zanipolo** · 03-05-19, 20:19

Originally Posted by Salento

... Who’re you talking to?

can you remove a sample in trueancestry and place another person if you have paid for more than the free test

i have my grandfather and my father......i want to remove my grandfather and test my sample

**Salento** · 03-05-19, 21:31

Originally Posted by zanipolo

can you remove a sample in trueancestry and place another person if you have paid for more than the free test

i have my grandfather and my father......i want to remove my grandfather and test my sample

Yes you can.

Delete your Grandfather, and upload your Raw-Data. Wait for your results.

After that, if you want, delete your data, and put back your Grandfather again.

Somehow the Site works better with Chrome (browser) on my PC.

i also think they’re updating the site.

**zanipolo** · 03-05-19, 23:21

Originally Posted by zanipolo

my grandfather's result
.
.
Gaul + Gallo-Roman (4.866)
Gaul + Thracian (5.522)
Gaul (8.086)
Gallo-Roman (8.595)
Thracian (8.85)
.
.
.
Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
1. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (8.086) - [Upgrade for more details]
2. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (8.595) - [Upgrade for more details]
3. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (8.602) - [Upgrade for more details]
4. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (8.85) - [Upgrade for more details]
5. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (8.85) - [Upgrade for more details]
6. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (8.857) - [Upgrade for more details]
7. Central Roman (670 AD) (9.77) - [Upgrade for more details]
8. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (10.44) - [Upgrade for more details]
9. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (10.66) - [Upgrade for more details]
10. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (10.93) - [Upgrade for more details]
11. Central Roman (590 AD) (11.0) - [Upgrade for more details]
12. Central Roman (590 AD) (11.04) - [Upgrade for more details]
13. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (11.32) - [Upgrade for more details]
14. Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (12.1) - [Upgrade for more details]
15. Medieval Frank (670 AD) (12.44) - [Upgrade for more details]
16. Central Roman (590 AD) (12.46) - [Upgrade for more details]
17. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (12.53) - [Upgrade for more details]
18. Roman Soldier Germany (300 BC) (13.59) - [Upgrade for more details]
19. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (13.69) - [Upgrade for more details]
20. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (13.77) - [Upgrade for more details]
21. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (14.48) - [Upgrade for more details]
22. Hellenic Roman (670 AD) (17.72) - [Upgrade for more details]
23. Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany (300 BC) (19.04) - [Upgrade for more details]
24. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (19.25) - [Upgrade for more details]
25. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (19.26) - [Upgrade for more details]
26. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (19.34) - [Upgrade for more details]
27. Alemannic Bavaria (450 AD) (19.67) - [Upgrade for more details]
28. Central Roman / Mixed (590 AD) (20.03) - [Upgrade for more details]
29. Gepid / Goth (450 AD) (20.11) - [Upgrade for more details]
30. Hellenic Roman (590 AD) (20.13) - [Upgrade for more details]
31. Celt / Hungary (590 AD) (20.95) - [Upgrade for more details]
32. Gaulic Gladiator York (250 AD) (21.09) - [Upgrade for more details]
33. Halstatt (775 BC) (21.17) - [Upgrade for more details]
34. Czech Velke Prilepy (0 AD) (21.32) - [Upgrade for more details]
35. Bell Beaker Poland (2500 BC) (21.53) - [Upgrade for more details]
36. Mycenaean (1350 BC) (22.21) - [Upgrade for more details]
37. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (22.42) - [Upgrade for more details]
38. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (22.5) - [Upgrade for more details]
39. Scythian Ukraine (600 BC) (22.76) - [Upgrade for more details]
40. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (22.87) - [Upgrade for more details]
.
.
only 1 deep dive
.
Alemannic Bavaria
450 AD
Total cM=29.71
Largest segment=9.05 cM (4 shared)

grandfather above and mine below
Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...
1. Cisalpine Gaul (590 AD) (8.252) - [Upgrade for more details]
2. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (8.921) - [Upgrade for more details]
3. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (9.498) - [Upgrade for more details]
4. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (9.723) - [Upgrade for more details]
5. Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (9.779) - [Upgrade for more details]
6. Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (10.35) - [Upgrade for more details]
7. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (11.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
8. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (11.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
9. Central Roman (670 AD) (12.07) - [Upgrade for more details]
10. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (12.14) - [Upgrade for more details]
11. Medieval Frank (670 AD) (12.81) - [Upgrade for more details]
12. Central Roman (590 AD) (12.95) - [Upgrade for more details]
13. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (13.2) - [Upgrade for more details]
14. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (13.26) - [Upgrade for more details]
15. Central Roman (590 AD) (13.43) - [Upgrade for more details]
16. Central Roman (590 AD) (13.71) - [Upgrade for more details]
17. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (13.83) - [Upgrade for more details]
18. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (14.31) - [Upgrade for more details]
19. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (15.0) - [Upgrade for more details]
20. Roman Soldier Germany (300 BC) (15.09) - [Upgrade for more details]
21. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (15.13) - [Upgrade for more details]
22. Scythian Moldova (300 BC) (17.79) - [Upgrade for more details]
23. Hellenic Roman (670 AD) (18.69) - [Upgrade for more details]
24. Celt / Hungary (590 AD) (19.96) - [Upgrade for more details]
25. Scythian Ukraine (600 BC) (20.01) - [Upgrade for more details]
26. Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany (300 BC) (20.08) - [Upgrade for more details]
27. Alemannic Bavaria (450 AD) (20.16) - [Upgrade for more details]
28. Gaulic Gladiator York (250 AD) (20.24) - [Upgrade for more details]
29. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (20.39) - [Upgrade for more details]
30. Frankish / Hungary (590 AD) (20.46) - [Upgrade for more details]
31. Bell Beaker Scotland (2145 BC) (20.69) - [Upgrade for more details]
32. Bell Beaker Poland (2500 BC) (20.79) - [Upgrade for more details]
33. Hungary Iron Age (800 BC) (20.8) - [Upgrade for more details]
34. Czech Velke Prilepy (0 AD) (21.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
35. Gepid / Goth (450 AD) (21.78) - [Upgrade for more details]
36. Germano-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (22.24) - [Upgrade for more details]
37. Halstatt (775 BC) (22.36) - [Upgrade for more details]
38. Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (22.38) - [Upgrade for more details]
39. Central Roman / Mixed (590 AD) (23.02) - [Upgrade for more details]
40. Crete Armenoi (1370 BC) (23.32) - [Upgrade for more details]
.
.
deep dive
Alemannic Bavaria
450 AD
Total cM=10.82
Largest segment=5.56 cM (5 shared. Sample quality: 9)
.
.
Illyrian / Dalmatia
1200 BC
Total cM=1.66
Largest segment=1.66 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 40)

.................................................. .................................

my father was updated to

Roman + Illyrian (4.913)
Gallo-Roman + Roman (6.367)
Gallo-Roman (7.349)
Illyrian (7.471)
Roman (9.665)

..
Roman Soldier Freiham-Nord Germany
300 BC
Total cM=4.36
Largest segment=4.36 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 81)
.
Mycenaean
1350 BC
Total cM=1.83
Largest segment=1.83 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 9)
.
Germano-Celtic Gladiator York
250 AD
Total cM=1.24
Largest segment=1.24 cM (1 shared. Sample quality: 18)

**Duarte** · 04-05-19, 01:06

For general knowledge:

MyTrueAncestry.com has changed the "Deep Dive" functionality algorithm and the numbers that are now appearing look more realistic. I recommend everyone to review their numbers since they are probably going to be downgraded in "Deep Dive". Look at my case.

Before:

Now:

**Lukas** · 04-05-19, 10:44

Originally Posted by Duarte

For general knowledge:

MyTrueAncestry.com has changed the "Deep Dive" functionality algorithm and the numbers that are now appearing look more realistic. I recommend everyone to review their numbers since they are probably going to be downgraded in "Deep Dive". Look at my case.

So Duarte.... who was right since the begining?:) Even Mytruancestry now finally must reduce cM values and must admit they were utterly wrong:)

But still some of those values are somewhat too big, unless they checked them in lowest treshold on something like Gedmatch one-to-one tool.

Also I'm interested how they explain their total fail with those very high matches? Of course it isn't question to Duarte, but general.

**Duarte** · 04-05-19, 12:54

Originally Posted by mlukas

So Duarte.... who was right since the begining?:) Even Mytruancestry now finally must reduce cM values and must admit they were utterly wrong:)

But still some of those values are somewhat too big, unless they checked them in lowest treshold on something like Gedmatch one-to-one tool.

Also I'm interested how they explain their total fail with those very high matches? Of course it isn't question to Duarte, but general.

Hello mlukas,

I'm not acknowledging that you're 100% correct. As you yourself say, in your understanding, matches are still very high. They have corrected the algorithm and now the results are more consistent with Genesis GEDmach in the default selections. In that sense, if they should explain, Genesis GEDmatch should also :)

Big hug and have a nice weekend

**Duarte** · 04-05-19, 14:52

My case.
MyTrueAncestry.com X Genesis GEDmatch:

**Angela** · 04-05-19, 16:36

@MLukas,
It would be very nice if you re-uploaded all the Collegno and Szolad samples which you removed. Thanks in advance.

It still remains to be explained by someone at gedmatch why we get such incredibly high matches with really old samples like Loschbour, LBK, NE1, BR2, and others.

The fact that mytrueancestry made such an egregious error is concerning, as is the fact it all seems to be based on work by Eurogenes, which is always suspect until proven otherwise imho. (On the K15 upon which it seems to be based my closest fits are a 5 and a 6, perhaps the worst fits I've ever gotten on any calculator, and I know my ancestry for the last 500 years at least. MDLP is much better.)

I'll stick with my free version even if it's just for fun.

**Duarte** · 04-05-19, 17:26

There are two new functionalities in MyTrueAncestry.com: The "Deep Dive Euro Map" and the "Deep Dive Asia Map".
Also, data in the Archaelogical Maps (Europe and Asia), was actualizized.
See some of my data below. I recomend that all who payed for the service, do the same.

**matty74** · 04-05-19, 23:22

Seems to be a slight change from the new update at the bottom:

**Duarte** · 05-05-19, 00:32

Originally Posted by matty74

Seems to be a slight change from the new update at the bottom:

In your case the mainly matches are with more recent samples (1600 AD and 1000 AD, high quality: 89). The quality of sample Bell Beaker (2050 BC ) is 35, much more low. Big Hug :)

**Lukas** · 05-05-19, 00:34

Originally Posted by Angela

@MLukas,
It would be very nice if you re-uploaded all the Collegno and Szolad samples which you removed. Thanks in advance.
.

I removed them few months ago because as there didn't have full snps number they were marked as damaged by Gedmatch after migration to Genesis.

Uploading all takes much time. Maybe just upload those which are most popular in people results?

**Duarte** · 05-05-19, 00:35

E-Mail received now from MyAncestry.com:

**Angela** · 05-05-19, 02:41

Originally Posted by mlukas

I removed them few months ago because as there didn't have full snps number they were marked as damaged by Gedmatch after migration to Genesis.

Uploading all takes much time. Maybe just upload those which are most popular in people results?

Thank you for your response, MLukas.

Anything you can do would be great. :)

**Salento** · 05-05-19, 06:30

Deep-Dive Map:

Archaeological Map:

Premium Map:

**Duarte** · 05-05-19, 13:45

Originally Posted by Salento

Deep-Dive Map:

Archaeological Map:

Premium Map:

ILLYRIAM/DALMATIA 1200 BC - I1333 - Genesis GEDmatch - mine:

THRACIAN BULGARIA 450 BC - I5769 - Genesis GEDmatch - mine:

**Jovialis** · 05-05-19, 14:02

Living DNA still shows the most results, despite having the least SNPs of all the raw data versions I have. While my Superkit in Ancestry format, has the most, and only shows a modest amount of results. Perhaps because the amount of SNPs being used fills out more information, and more correctly shows what my actual results should be with this calculator? I don't think more results on the map necessarily indicate that it is more accurate. Idk But I do know more SNPs should yield more information. It is either the other ones a false matches being assigned to various samples, that is fleshed out more with more SNPs. Many of samples I get were all influenced and overlap with the Anatolian copper-age, so I can see how it (or any calculator really) could mistakenly assign those samples. Or the format in Living DNA just works better this calculator.

Ancestry by itself shows more results on the map, but the Superkit, in the same format shows slightly less. So perhaps that now that it has more SNPs to go by, it more correctly assigns the samples. Nevertheless, in 23andme format, it shows nothing, so format of the raw data is definitely a factor.

Oddly, my brother, and mother's 23andme raw data show about as much on their map, as my Living DNA kit does. They're using the same version as me.

Thread: Mytrueancestry.com

Thread Tools

Display

Posting Permissions