Mytrueancestry.com

My results, no surprise for a British mutt :)
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190526-120356.jpg
    Screenshot_20190526-120356.jpg
    25.4 KB · Views: 68
New Ged-Genesis Archaic Matches
There’s a HUGE difference between Combined and single RawData.

Combined @1cm

jahSV1r.jpg



23 v5 @1cm

xm8Ph1p.jpg



:unsure: probably I should've opened a new thread :)
 
New Ged-Genesis Archaic Matches
There’s a HUGE difference between Combined and single RawData.
Combined @1cm

jahSV1r.jpg


23 v5 @1cm

xm8Ph1p.jpg

:unsure: probably I should've opened a new thread :)

30x coverage of whole-genome sequencing will show even more. That's the "gold standard" of medical and academic DNA testing. This is why people should take genotyping consumer genomics, with a grain of salt. The lack of SNPs impacts the algorthim's interpretation of results. It is like trying to read a book with random pages torn out, or sentences omitted. Right now Dante Labs offers that, but it is still a bit pricey.
 
MTA - (Combined) Deep Dive & ...

ZVn4pFm.jpg


Fr9MjY0.jpg

58SA0Ux.jpg
 
18. Morisco Andalusia Iberia (1550 AD) (16.63) - I7425

Roman Hispania /
Illyrian /Roman

Ancient Group
Roman Hispania + Illyrian (5.968)

Roman Hispania + Roman (8.013)
Roman Hispania (9.593)
Roman (11.46)
Illyrian (11.6)

Similar Samples
Early Medieval Iberia Granada (500 AD) (7.885)
Medieval Iberian Valencia (1100 AD) (8.926)
Late Roman Iberia Granada (650 AD) (9.593)
Late Roman Iberia Granada (500 AD) (10.99)
Medieval Iberian Valencia (1200 AD) (11.07)

Modern Group
1. Spanish_Extremadura (10.02)
2. North_Italian (10.14)
3. Spanish_Murcia (10.85)
4. Portuguese (11.16)
5. Spanish_Andalucia (11.81)
6. Tuscan (12.58)
7. Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon (12.84)
8. Spanish_Galicia (12.90)

metimeline2.jpg

ZZ2243872_EB4566MORISCOGRANADA.jpeg


Comparison of my kit with Moorish Granada. I do not get anything with anyone with that one plus one so I have to look for life.



 
30x coverage of whole-genome sequencing will show even more. That's the "gold standard" of medical and academic DNA testing. This is why people should take genotyping consumer genomics, with a grain of salt. The lack of SNPs impacts the algorthim's interpretation of results. It is like trying to read a book with random pages torn out, or sentences omitted. Right now Dante Labs offers that, but it is still a bit pricey.

Full genome sequencing it's not cheap, but what about 3rd party compatibility?

Dante Labs $599 (RawData + Gen. Diseases)

Helix $499 (RawData only)
 
Superkit in AncestryDNA format:

Hellenic Roman + Roman (5.803)
Ancient Greek + Hellenic Roman (7.635)
Hellenic Roman (8.423)
Roman (13.58)
Ancient Greek (14.4)

Superkit in FTDNA format:

Hellenic Roman + Roman (5.815)
Ancient Greek + Hellenic Roman (7.665)
Hellenic Roman (8.412)
Roman (13.58)
Ancient Greek (14.43)

Both give me 0.67 cM for Mycenean I9033
 
Full genome sequencing it's not cheap, but what about 3rd party compatibility?

Dante Labs $599 (RawData + Gen. Diseases)

Helix $499 (RawData only)

MytrueAncestry is compatible with it, and I think Gedmatch as well. But I'm sure in the coming years, all of the consumer genomic testing companies will make the change from genotyping to sequencing, once it is cost efficient.
 
I have also found this conclusion of the author of the article:

Definitely. From the humble opinion of a fan of ancient history there was a town with a different culture to the Celtic and the Iberian that inhabited our peninsula from the final bronze, without ruling out that it was already there from time immemorial. This town was mixed with the Iberian and Celtic in subsequent invasions losing part of their identity, thus hindering the work of researchers.
Archaeologists and historians have a difficult subject pending with Ilirios and Ligures. Let's hope for new results in the meantime.

http://hispanosenguerra.blogspot.com/2014/12/ilirios-y-ligures.html

hispania7.gif


After seeing this map everything must be more complex than what has been sold to date.

Maps of my mitochondrial DNA and DNA
MAPAMITOCONDRIALM%25C3%258DO.jpeg

mapadnaYmio.jpeg


5. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (10.8)

Similar Samples
Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (6.456)

Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (7.049)
Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (7.332)
Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (7.422)
Medieval Iberian Valencia (1100 AD) (9.028)

Modern Groups
1. Spanish_Extremadura (6.749)
2. Spanish_Murcia (6.887)
3. Spanish_Cataluna (6.957)
4. Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon (7.206)
5. Spanish_Andalucia (7.233)
6. Spanish_Valencia (7.494)
7. North_Italian (7.731)
8. Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha (7.798)

mytrueancestry.com_c_main.py%2B%252826%2529.png

metimeline2CLARAdetalleilirio.jpg


I have Illyrians just at the same time as the bronze of Portugal 1600 BC (by the way Duarte I have bronze Portugal and you do not lol) and then in 1200 BC.
 
Thanks
I have also found this conclusion of the author of the article:

Definitely. From the humble opinion of a fan of ancient history there was a town with a different culture to the Celtic and the Iberian that inhabited our peninsula from the final bronze, without ruling out that it was already there from time immemorial. This town was mixed with the Iberian and Celtic in subsequent invasions losing part of their identity, thus hindering the work of researchers.
Archaeologists and historians have a difficult subject pending with Ilirios and Ligures. Let's hope for new results in the meantime.

http://hispanosenguerra.blogspot.com/2014/12/ilirios-y-ligures.html

hispania7.gif


After seeing this map everything must be more complex than what has been sold to date.

Maps of my mitochondrial DNA and DNA
MAPAMITOCONDRIALM%25C3%258DO.jpeg

mapadnaYmio.jpeg


5. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (10.8)

Similar Samples
Medieval Iberian (670 AD) (6.456)

Medieval Piedmont (670 AD) (7.049)
Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (7.332)
Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (7.422)
Medieval Iberian Valencia (1100 AD) (9.028)

Modern Groups
1. Spanish_Extremadura (6.749)
2. Spanish_Murcia (6.887)
3. Spanish_Cataluna (6.957)
4. Spanish_Castilla_Y_Leon (7.206)
5. Spanish_Andalucia (7.233)
6. Spanish_Valencia (7.494)
7. North_Italian (7.731)
8. Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha (7.798)

mytrueancestry.com_c_main.py%2B%252826%2529.png

metimeline2CLARAdetalleilirio.jpg


I have Illyrians just at the same time as the bronze of Portugal 1600 BC (by the way Duarte I have bronze Portugal and you do not lol) and then in 1200 BC.

Hello Carlos.
I do not know why these Portuguese of the Bronze Age do not appear in my ancestral timeline, because I have the connection below with them in the "Deep Dive":

xJNZU2m.jpg



Maybe MTA believes they are not important, I do not know. LOL :LOL:.
Hugs dear friend. (y) :)
 
Superkit in AncestryDNA format:

Hellenic Roman + Roman (5.803)
Ancient Greek + Hellenic Roman (7.635)
Hellenic Roman (8.423)
Roman (13.58)
Ancient Greek (14.4)

Superkit in FTDNA format:

Hellenic Roman + Roman (5.815)
Ancient Greek + Hellenic Roman (7.665)
Hellenic Roman (8.412)
Roman (13.58)
Ancient Greek (14.43)

Both give me 0.67 cM for Mycenean I9033

Which of these 2 formats do you think is better.

My last SuperKit is the DNA-KS 23 default.

I downloaded the latest DNA Kit Studio version,
But I haven't installed it yet.

... v2.6
Added MTDNA prediction for RAW files, VCF files and Yoruban Fixed RAW Analysis with new FTDNA files ...

http://dnagenics.com/dna-kit-studio/
 
Which of these 2 formats do you think is better.

My last SuperKit is the DNA-KS 23 default.

I downloaded the latest DNA Kit Studio version,
But I haven't installed it yet.

... v2.6
Added MTDNA prediction for RAW files, VCF files and Yoruban Fixed RAW Analysis with new FTDNA files ...

http://dnagenics.com/dna-kit-studio/

For MTA, these formats are pretty equal. They were both made with DNA kit studio. They also work the best with Admixture Studio.
 
For MTA, these formats are pretty equal. They were both made with DNA kit studio. They also work the best with Admixture Studio.

I used DNA kit studio too.

MTA 23 issue: Did you convert the 23andme v5 RawData in-to other formats, And if you did, did you get better results?

... too many questions :) That’s the last one.
 
My GIF Euro Timelapses and yours are almost identical.

RUh2cAI.gif




Mycenaeans from Ancestry RawD:


2fwmSAf.jpg

Hellenic Roman + Roman (7.219)

Ancient Greek + Roman (8.144)
Hellenic Roman (10.14)
Roman (12.8)
Ancient Greek (14.73)
 
Last edited:
I used DNA kit studio too.

MTA 23 issue: Did you convert the 23andme v5 RawData in-to other formats, And if you did, did you get better results?

... too many questions :) That’s the last one.

I haven't tried it yet.
 
Can't post a map due to not having written enough posts, however, mine looks more or less exactly like Dibrans. The only difference being that I've got some Ostrogoth.

Your closest genetic modern populations...


1. Kosovan (5.285)
2. Greek (5.314)
3. Bulgarian (9.507)
4. Greek_Thessaly (9.633)
5. Tuscan (9.906)
6. Italian_Abruzzo (11.06)
7. West_Sicilian (11.42)
8. Central_Greek (12.05)

Your closest Ancient populations...

Roman

RomansHellenic RomansGallo-Romans


Roman (7.701)
Gallo-Roman + Hellenic Roman (8.834)
Hellenic Roman + Roman (9.917)
Hellenic Roman (13.58)
Gallo-Roman (14.74)
 
I haven't tried it yet.
23andme v5 converted to Ancestry format

2 extra deep dive samples, the rest is almost all the same.

23 v5 to Ancestry Deep Dive

Central Roman 590 AD SZ32
Illyrian / Dalmatia 1600 BC I4332
Thracian Bulgaria 450 BC I5769
Mycenaean 1350 BC I9006
Mycenaean 1350 BC I9041
Minoan 2000 BC I0071
Copper Age Anatolia 3800 BC I0184
Bronze Age Armenia 1500 BC Rise397
Hittite Anatolia 1675 BC MA2200
Hittite Anatolia 1875 BC MA2206
Canaanite 1600 BC ERS1790730
Canaanite 1600 BC ERS1790729
Canaanite 1600 BC ERS1790732


Latest 23 v5 Deep Dive

Central Roman 590 AD SZ32
Illyrian / Dalmatia 1600 BC I4332
Thracian Bulgaria 450 BC I5769
Mycenaean 1350 BC I9006
Copper Age Anatolia 3800 BC I0184
Bronze Age Armenia 1500 BC Rise397
Hittite Anatolia 1675 BC MA2200
Hittite Anatolia 1875 BC MA2206
Canaanite 1600 BC ERS1790730
Canaanite 1600 BC ERS1790729
Canaanite 1600 BC ERS1790732
 
Combined (Ancestry Format)

Deep Dive
NhwPZZk.png

1. Hellenic Roman (590 AD) (9.519)
- SZ40
2. Central Roman (590 AD) (12.52) - SZ36
3. Hellenic Roman (670 AD) (13.24) - CL121
4. Central Roman / Mixed (590 AD) (13.26) - SZ19
5. Hellenic Roman / Cretan (670 AD) (13.54) - CL38
 

This thread has been viewed 1253365 times.

Back
Top