Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Page 4 of 37 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 906

Thread: Mytrueancestry.com

  1. #76
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    12-03-14
    Posts
    415
    Points
    8,499
    Level
    27
    Points: 8,499, Level: 27
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 251
    Overall activity: 34.0%


    Country: Italy



    Quote Originally Posted by Angela View Post
    So, did the Italic tribes indeed cross the Adriatic to become the Appennine herder culture???
    Odd that you're closer to Illyrians than the people living in the area now.
    Well, maybe not. Maybe it's normal.
    The people living in Pannonia are no longer "Central Roman".
    I wonder if your results are impacted, however, by your Cimbri ancestry? How much of your ancestry is attributable to them?
    I confess I still didn't "digest" the results posted here yet, including my own. I saw them all very briefly. I'll try to do it when I find more time.

    As for the cimbri, well, my guess is that I haven't inherited too much from them, 'cause they're too far. That's why I talked about it as a "factoid" in another thread. :)
    The cimbra was my father's 2nd great-grandmother. Maybe half cimbra, because I'm not sure about her mother, while her father certainly was cimbro.
    Last edited by Regio X; 11-04-19 at 14:14.

  2. #77
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Three Friends1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    2,342
    Points
    17,479
    Level
    40
    Points: 17,479, Level: 40
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 571
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by Jovialis View Post
    I feel as though the AncestryDNA raw data paints a fuller picture, than the 23andme raw data. For example, I do not get Sicily beaker in Living DNA, or 23andme. But It comes up with the AncestryDNA, as well as the combined raw data file.
    I posted the 23andme v4, I should have specified that.

    I chose the v4 because the v5 missed the Ostrogoths too. :)

  3. #78
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registered10000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    07-08-18
    Posts
    842
    Points
    10,677
    Level
    31
    Points: 10,677, Level: 31
    Level completed: 19%, Points required for next Level: 573
    Overall activity: 76.0%


    Country: Germany



    Quote Originally Posted by Regio X View Post




    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...


    1. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1200 BC) (3.809)
    2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (6.157)
    3. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (6.232)
    4. Gallo-Roman (590 AD) (7.404)
    5. Iberian / Piedmont (670 AD) (8.294)
    6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (9.4)
    7. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (9.407)
    8. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (10.86)
    9. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (11.04)
    10. Thracian Bulgaria (450 BC) (11.04)
    11. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (11.52)
    12. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (11.61)
    13. Central Roman (590 AD) (13.2)
    14. Frankish-Gaul / Lombardy Italy (670 AD) (13.33)
    15. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (13.8)
    16. Medieval Tyrolian (590 AD) (13.82)
    17. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (14.56)
    18. Medieval Tyrolian (670 AD) (14.88)
    19. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 AD) (15.24)
    20. Swiss Germanic (670 AD) (16.34)


    Your closest genetic modern populations...


    1. North_Italian (7.641)
    2. Spanish_Cataluna (9.274)
    3. Spanish_Extremadura (9.600)
    4. Spanish_Murcia (9.807)
    5. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
    6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
    7. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
    8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account
    That's a really tiny distance for such an ancient sample - crazy. Are you from north-eastern Italy?

    Looks like northern Italy and the western Balkans were settled by very similar BA populations.

  4. #79
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    12-03-14
    Posts
    415
    Points
    8,499
    Level
    27
    Points: 8,499, Level: 27
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 251
    Overall activity: 34.0%


    Country: Italy



    Quote Originally Posted by markod View Post
    That's a really tiny distance for such an ancient sample - crazy. Are you from north-eastern Italy?
    Looks like northern Italy and the western Balkans were settled by very similar BA populations.
    Yep, Northeastern mainly (in ancestry). The exception is my father's paternal grandmother, from Mantova province, Lombardy.

    Perhaps I inherited much of their "Illyrian side" and became closer to Illyrians compared to them. :)

  5. #80
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    12-03-14
    Posts
    415
    Points
    8,499
    Level
    27
    Points: 8,499, Level: 27
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 251
    Overall activity: 34.0%


    Country: Italy



    Quote Originally Posted by Regio X View Post
    It seems interesting. I wonder what methodological framework they use in the comparisons.
    I'll try it when I access the laptop. :)
    It looks just an Oracle, then they must have been using Admixture...
    Last edited by Regio X; 11-04-19 at 01:52.

  6. #81
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Three Friends1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    2,342
    Points
    17,479
    Level
    40
    Points: 17,479, Level: 40
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 571
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by Jovialis View Post
    I feel as though the AncestryDNA raw data paints a fuller picture, than the 23andme raw data. For example, I do not get Sicily beaker in Living DNA, or 23andme. But It comes up with the AncestryDNA, as well as the combined raw data file.
    Quote Originally Posted by Salento View Post
    I posted the 23andme v4, I should have specified that.
    I chose the v4 because the v5 missed the Ostrogoths too. :)
    Premium Maps: 23 vs Anc.
    Roman, Hellenic Roman, and Illyrian differences.

    23 v4:

    Anc.




    Complete Archeological Maps. 23 vs Anc.:

    23 v4

    Anc.

  7. #82
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points3 months registered

    Join Date
    02-02-19
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    159
    Points
    1,855
    Level
    12
    Points: 1,855, Level: 12
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 295
    Overall activity: 16.0%


    Ethnic group
    Northern European
    Country: United States



    Can someone explain to me what these genetic distances are?

  8. #83
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Three Friends1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    2,342
    Points
    17,479
    Level
    40
    Points: 17,479, Level: 40
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 571
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by matty74 View Post
    Can someone explain to me what these genetic distances are?
    The smaller the Number, the closer you are related.

    From the website:

    Genetic distance measures how close you are to a given sample.

    10 means this is your ancient ancestry

    20 means this is part of your ancestral link

    30 means possibly related to your ancestry

  9. #84
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience Points3 months registered

    Join Date
    02-02-19
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    159
    Points
    1,855
    Level
    12
    Points: 1,855, Level: 12
    Level completed: 2%, Points required for next Level: 295
    Overall activity: 16.0%


    Ethnic group
    Northern European
    Country: United States




    Thanks for the information. I find it hard to believe I'm that closely related to those ancient populations. Some of you are related to much older populations, so those distances make sense. So taking those numbers into account, I'm directly descended from those dirty barbarians. We're to blame for the Dark Ages. Will I need to make reparations for Rome?!

    I assume those archaeogentic matches are from grave sites or archaeological discoveries in the region? It's interesting that my closest match is a "Pict" and I've associated those with ancient Scotland but this site is in northern Italy per the map. What gives??

    Your closest Ancient populations

    Longobard + Saxon (3.065)
    Celt + Longobard (3.315)
    Longobard (5.104)
    Celt (6.764)
    Saxon (7.239)

    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches

    1. Pict (670 AD) (4.452)
    - CL83
    2. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (5.104) - CL92
    3. Bronze Age Celt England (1000 BC) (5.469) - I5383
    4. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (5.941) - SZ15
    5. Celtic Briton (0 AD) (6.126) - Hinxton 4
    6. Celtic/Viking Iceland (1000 AD) (6.764) - VDP-A6
    7. Nordic-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (6.875) - 6DRIF-18
    8. Late Medieval Gotlander (1600 AD) (7.22) - Unknown
    9. Anglo Saxon (700 AD) (7.239) - Hinxton HS3
    10. Bell Beaker Southern France (2050 BC) (7.539) - I3875
    11. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (7.546) - SZ12
    12. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (7.637) - CL146
    13. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (7.64) - SZ14
    14. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (7.847) - CL145
    15. Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) (7.95) - AED_249
    16. Briton Gladiator York (250 AD) (8.037) - 6DRIF-23
    17. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (8.04) - CL84
    18. Alemannic Bavaria (465 AD) (8.084) - NW_255
    19. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (8.12) - SZ4
    20. Ireland Copper Age (1880 BC) (8.14) - Rathlin2

  10. #85
    Moderator Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,558
    Points
    66,028
    Level
    79
    Points: 66,028, Level: 79
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 422
    Overall activity: 85.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
    The rest of my family gets almost the same exact results as me. Including my mother and father, who have a map almost identical to mine. With some different samples of Hellenic Romans, Romans, etc. But are in the same general grouping.

    @Salento, they get a similar complete archaeological map to the ones you have.
    Last edited by Jovialis; 11-04-19 at 12:18.

  11. #86
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Location
    Belo Horizonte
    Posts
    370
    Points
    5,317
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,317, Level: 21
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 233
    Overall activity: 97.0%


    Ethnic group
    Brazilian
    Country: Brazil



    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by matty74 View Post

    Thanks for the information. I find it hard to believe I'm that closely related to those ancient populations. Some of you are related to much older populations, so those distances make sense. So taking those numbers into account, I'm directly descended from those dirty barbarians. We're to blame for the Dark Ages. Will I need to make reparations for Rome?!

    I assume those archaeogentic matches are from grave sites or archaeological discoveries in the region? It's interesting that my closest match is a "Pict" and I've associated those with ancient Scotland but this site is in northern Italy per the map. What gives??

    Your closest Ancient populations

    Longobard + Saxon (3.065)
    Celt + Longobard (3.315)
    Longobard (5.104)
    Celt (6.764)
    Saxon (7.239)

    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches

    1. Pict (670 AD) (4.452)
    - CL83
    2. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (5.104) - CL92
    3. Bronze Age Celt England (1000 BC) (5.469) - I5383
    4. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (5.941) - SZ15
    5. Celtic Briton (0 AD) (6.126) - Hinxton 4
    6. Celtic/Viking Iceland (1000 AD) (6.764) - VDP-A6
    7. Nordic-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (6.875) - 6DRIF-18
    8. Late Medieval Gotlander (1600 AD) (7.22) - Unknown
    9. Anglo Saxon (700 AD) (7.239) - Hinxton HS3
    10. Bell Beaker Southern France (2050 BC) (7.539) - I3875
    11. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (7.546) - SZ12
    12. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (7.637) - CL146
    13. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (7.64) - SZ14
    14. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (7.847) - CL145
    15. Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) (7.95) - AED_249
    16. Briton Gladiator York (250 AD) (8.037) - 6DRIF-23
    17. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (8.04) - CL84
    18. Alemannic Bavaria (465 AD) (8.084) - NW_255
    19. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (8.12) - SZ4
    20. Ireland Copper Age (1880 BC) (8.14) - Rathlin2
    Dear matty.
    The Pict people was celts that lived to the north of the rivers Forth and Clyde, and spoke the Pictish language, which was closely related to the Celtic Brittonic language spoken by the Britons who lived to the south of them.
    After the Roman conquest of Britain in the 1st century, a Romano-British culture emerged, and Latin and British Vulgar Latin coexisted with Brittonic. During and after the Roman era, the Britons lived throughout Britain. Their relationship with the Picts, who lived north of the Firth of Forth, has been the subject of much discussion, though most scholars now accept that the Pictish language was related to Common Brittonic, rather than a separate Celtic language (Reference: English Wikipedia).
    We can especulat that this ancient pict man may be related to Romanized Britons who must have passed through the northwest of Italy, I do not Know :)

  12. #87
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    12-03-14
    Posts
    415
    Points
    8,499
    Level
    27
    Points: 8,499, Level: 27
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 251
    Overall activity: 34.0%


    Country: Italy



    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by matty74 View Post
    Can someone explain to me what these genetic distances are?
    They must run the user's and ancient's data in a certain calculator and then set the distances based on the differences for each cluster, as a common Oracle. Just a guess.
    While it may provide clues on real ancestry or shared ancestry, in my opinion it should not be taken too literally.

  13. #88
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1 year registered1000 Experience Points
    magicalM's Avatar
    Join Date
    03-06-17
    Age
    42
    Posts
    15
    Points
    1,485
    Level
    10
    Points: 1,485, Level: 10
    Level completed: 68%, Points required for next Level: 65
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    J-m12
    MtDNA haplogroup
    ia1a1

    Ethnic group
    Hungarian Germanic Balkans
    Country: Hungary



    Here is mine

    Sent fra min Moto G (5) Plus via Tapatalk

  14. #89
    Advisor Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    14,695
    Points
    240,617
    Level
    100
    Points: 240,617, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by matty74 View Post

    Thanks for the information. I find it hard to believe I'm that closely related to those ancient populations. Some of you are related to much older populations, so those distances make sense. So taking those numbers into account, I'm directly descended from those dirty barbarians. We're to blame for the Dark Ages. Will I need to make reparations for Rome?!

    I assume those archaeogentic matches are from grave sites or archaeological discoveries in the region? It's interesting that my closest match is a "Pict" and I've associated those with ancient Scotland but this site is in northern Italy per the map. What gives??

    Your closest Ancient populations

    Longobard + Saxon (3.065)
    Celt + Longobard (3.315)
    Longobard (5.104)
    Celt (6.764)
    Saxon (7.239)

    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches

    1. Pict (670 AD) (4.452)
    - CL83
    2. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (5.104) - CL92
    3. Bronze Age Celt England (1000 BC) (5.469) - I5383
    4. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (5.941) - SZ15
    5. Celtic Briton (0 AD) (6.126) - Hinxton 4
    6. Celtic/Viking Iceland (1000 AD) (6.764) - VDP-A6
    7. Nordic-Celtic Gladiator York (250 AD) (6.875) - 6DRIF-18
    8. Late Medieval Gotlander (1600 AD) (7.22) - Unknown
    9. Anglo Saxon (700 AD) (7.239) - Hinxton HS3
    10. Bell Beaker Southern France (2050 BC) (7.539) - I3875
    11. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (7.546) - SZ12
    12. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (7.637) - CL146
    13. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (7.64) - SZ14
    14. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (7.847) - CL145
    15. Alemannic Bavaria (500 AD) (7.95) - AED_249
    16. Briton Gladiator York (250 AD) (8.037) - 6DRIF-23
    17. Nordic Lombard (670 AD) (8.04) - CL84
    18. Alemannic Bavaria (465 AD) (8.084) - NW_255
    19. Nordic Lombard (590 AD) (8.12) - SZ4
    20. Ireland Copper Age (1880 BC) (8.14) - Rathlin2
    In the Collegno graveyard there were people who were more Celtic like than Longobard like. They might be descendants of people who were picked up along the Longobard journey from northern Germany. Picts are also Celts. That's why this company chose that name. I don't think it was necessarily a wise choice. It just confuses people.


    Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci

  15. #90
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Three Friends1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    2,342
    Points
    17,479
    Level
    40
    Points: 17,479, Level: 40
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 571
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by Jovialis View Post
    The rest of my family gets almost the same exact results as me. Including my mother and father, who have a map almost identical to mine. With some different samples of Hellenic Romans, Romans, etc. But are in the same general grouping.

    @Salento, they get a similar complete archaeological map to the ones you have.
    In a general sense we could represent the Apulian's genetic makeup.

    As I have in common similarities on the maps, your closest relatives are definitely Great People, Very Smart, and Really Good-Looking. :)

  16. #91
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Three Friends1 year registered10000 Experience Points
    Salento's Avatar
    Join Date
    30-05-17
    Posts
    2,342
    Points
    17,479
    Level
    40
    Points: 17,479, Level: 40
    Level completed: 29%, Points required for next Level: 571
    Overall activity: 99.3%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    T1a2 -Z19945
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H12a

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.
    @matty74 as Reparation goes, you should take into account that those Gladiators in your results weren’t the beneficiaries of freedom (you know what I mean).

    @Duarte imho:
    https://www.eupedia.com/forum/thread...l=1#post557126

  17. #92
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points
    Mars's Avatar
    Join Date
    25-02-14
    Posts
    213
    Points
    6,812
    Level
    24
    Points: 6,812, Level: 24
    Level completed: 53%, Points required for next Level: 238
    Overall activity: 3.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a2a1a1b3
    MtDNA haplogroup
    HV

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: Italy



    This is me. I'm of full northern italian ancestry. Question: might the scythian "ancestry" be real somehow?

    Your closest Ancient populations...

    Gallo-Roman + Roman (2.919)
    Roman (4.68)
    Scythian + Roman (4.763)
    Gallo-Roman (7.774)
    Scythian (10.0)


    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...

    1. Central Roman (590 AD) (4.68)
    2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (4.79)
    3. Central Roman (670 AD) (5.554)
    4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (7.774)
    5. Central Roman (590 AD) (9.168)
    6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (9.941)
    7. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (10.0)
    8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (10.07)
    9. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (11.0)
    Nullum magnum ingenium mixtura dementiae fuit.

  18. #93
    Advisor Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    14,695
    Points
    240,617
    Level
    100
    Points: 240,617, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    Quote Originally Posted by Mars View Post
    This is me. I'm of full northern italian ancestry. Question: might the scythian "ancestry" be real somehow?

    Your closest Ancient populations...

    Gallo-Roman + Roman (2.919)
    Roman (4.68)
    Scythian + Roman (4.763)
    Gallo-Roman (7.774)
    Scythian (10.0)


    Your closest Archaeogenetic matches...

    1. Central Roman (590 AD) (4.68)
    2. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (4.79)
    3. Central Roman (670 AD) (5.554)
    4. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (7.774)
    5. Central Roman (590 AD) (9.168)
    6. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (9.941)
    7. Scythian Moldova (270 BC) (10.0)
    8. [Hidden] - upgrade your account (10.07)
    9. Illyrian / Dalmatia (1600 BC) (11.0)
    I got it too, although not as close a score as yours. I'm not sure what to make of it. It also showed up on Kurd's ancient calculator. I think at that time I concluded that it might just be a trace of a slightly more "eastern" steppe strain.

  19. #94
    Regular Member Achievements:
    Veteran5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    12-03-14
    Posts
    415
    Points
    8,499
    Level
    27
    Points: 8,499, Level: 27
    Level completed: 59%, Points required for next Level: 251
    Overall activity: 34.0%


    Country: Italy



    1 out of 1 members found this post helpful.
    I decided to compare their results (modern pops) with GedMatch's. Mine, father's, mother's... You all can do the same. And guess what? Their Oracle resembles the EUtest V2 K15 Oracle. Just the numbers are slightly different, also because the references may differ a bit. Still...
    So it must function roughly the way I described.

    Anyway, using existing tools or not, they must have had a lot of work. The page is very well built, and the test is useful. It'll be probably improved soon, as more ancient DNAs are available. Congrats to the authors!

  20. #95
    Moderator Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,558
    Points
    66,028
    Level
    79
    Points: 66,028, Level: 79
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 422
    Overall activity: 85.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    Quote Originally Posted by Regio X View Post
    I decided to compare their results (modern pops) with GedMatch's. Mine, father's, mother's... You all can do the same. And guess what? Their Oracle resembles the EUtest V2 K15 Oracle. Just the numbers are slightly different, also because the references may differ a bit. Still...
    So it must function roughly the way I described.

    Anyway, using existing tools or not, they must have had a lot of work. The page is very well built, and the test is useful. It'll be probably improved soon, as more ancient DNAs are available. Congrats to the authors!
    I really do like this calculator too, I hope they do add to it as time goes on. I really appreciate the way they link the specific samples back to the papers they come from.

  21. #96
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registered5000 Experience Points
    Duarte's Avatar
    Join Date
    08-01-19
    Location
    Belo Horizonte
    Posts
    370
    Points
    5,317
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,317, Level: 21
    Level completed: 54%, Points required for next Level: 233
    Overall activity: 97.0%


    Ethnic group
    Brazilian
    Country: Brazil



    Quote Originally Posted by Salento View Post
    @matty74 as Reparation goes, you should take into account that those Gladiators in your results weren’t the beneficiaries of freedom (you know what I mean).

    @Duarte imho:
    https://www.eupedia.com/forum/thread...l=1#post557126
    Thanks Salento 😀 👍

  22. #97
    Junior Member Achievements:
    3 months registered500 Experience Points

    Join Date
    06-10-18
    Posts
    5
    Points
    511
    Level
    5
    Points: 511, Level: 5
    Level completed: 61%, Points required for next Level: 39
    Overall activity: 0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    J2a1b
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H1

    Ethnic group
    Friulian
    Country: Italy



    This is what I got:
    My closest ancient population :
    Hellenic Roman + Illyrian (9.957)
    Hellenic Roman + Roman (11.83)
    Roman (13.75)
    Hellenic Roman (14.14)
    Illyrian (14.23)

    My closest archaeogenetics matches:
    1. Medieval Tyrolean (590 A.D.) (13.58)
    2. Hidden
    3. Hellenic Roman (590 A.D) (14.14 )
    4. Hidden
    5. Thracian Bulgaria (450 B.C.) (14.23)
    6. Hidden
    7.Cisalpine Gaul (590 A.D) (14. 72)
    8. Hidden
    9. Medieval Hungary / Balkan (1244 A.D.) (15.17)
    10-20. Hidden

    My closest genetic modern population:
    1.Greek_Thessaly (12.66)
    2. Tuscan (13.61)
    3. Macedonian (14.26)
    4. North Italian (14.73)
    5-8. Hidden

    (In the map I got also a couple of Scythian dots)

  23. #98
    Advisor Achievements:
    VeteranThree Friends50000 Experience PointsRecommendation Second Class
    Awards:
    Posting Award
    Angela's Avatar
    Join Date
    02-01-11
    Posts
    14,695
    Points
    240,617
    Level
    100
    Points: 240,617, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 99.6%


    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: USA - New York



    Quote Originally Posted by Regio X View Post
    I decided to compare their results (modern pops) with GedMatch's. Mine, father's, mother's... You all can do the same. And guess what? Their Oracle resembles the EUtest V2 K15 Oracle. Just the numbers are slightly different, also because the references may differ a bit. Still...
    So it must function roughly the way I described.

    Anyway, using existing tools or not, they must have had a lot of work. The page is very well built, and the test is useful. It'll be probably improved soon, as more ancient DNAs are available. Congrats to the authors!
    I agree. I would never have attempted to compare my genome with all of these ancient samples.

    I have to say it's a little strange for me to think that I'm closer genetically to an ancient sample from Roman Pannonia in 590 AD, than to any modern Italian population. My best scores are usually a 4 or a 5 to Bergamo and Tuscany, or Tuscany and Bergamo, depending on the calculator, and here I got a 3.614 to a single Roman sample. Even with the Piedmont/Ligurian sample, my score is 4.73 and everything else is higher (MDLP K23b).

    I don't know if this is the same Eurogenes calculator you're discussing, but these are my scores:

    #Population (source)Distance1Tuscan5.032North_Italian6.053Italian_Abruzzo10.05 4West_Sicilian10.515Spanish_Murcia11.936Spanish_Ex tremadura11.977Spanish_Andalucia11.988Greek12.419P ortuguese12.5610Greek_Thessaly12.711Spanish_Castil la_Y_Leon12.8912Spanish_Cataluna12.9813Spanish_Val encia13.0114East_Sicilian13.6115Central_Greek13.64 16Spanish_Galicia13.7817Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha 13.9218Bulgarian14.2319South_Italian14.8620Romania n14.91

    I'm pretty sure the higher Sicilian than Southern Italian scores are because of the "Lombard", actually all of Northwestern Italy, migration to Sicily in the Middle Ages to "reclaim" it for Latin Christianity.

  24. #99
    Moderator Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class1 year registered50000 Experience Points
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    2,558
    Points
    66,028
    Level
    79
    Points: 66,028, Level: 79
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 422
    Overall activity: 85.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    2 out of 2 members found this post helpful.




    My DNA Land results match the Mytrueancestry results

    AncestryDNA

  25. #100
    Regular Member Achievements:
    3 months registered1000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    25-06-18
    Posts
    212
    Points
    3,477
    Level
    17
    Points: 3,477, Level: 17
    Level completed: 7%, Points required for next Level: 373
    Overall activity: 76.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b-M269 (LDNA)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    U5a1b

    Ethnic group
    Thracian
    Country: Greece



    Quote Originally Posted by Regio X View Post
    I decided to compare their results (modern pops) with GedMatch's. Mine, father's, mother's... You all can do the same. And guess what? Their Oracle resembles the EUtest V2 K15 Oracle. Just the numbers are slightly different, also because the references may differ a bit. Still...
    So it must function roughly the way I described.

    Anyway, using existing tools or not, they must have had a lot of work. The page is very well built, and the test is useful. It'll be probably improved soon, as more ancient DNAs are available. Congrats to the authors!
    Yeah my results are pretty close.

Page 4 of 37 FirstFirst ... 2345614 ... LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •