Mytrueancestry.com

In Ancient Relavites the first population is Ancient Middle Helladic Elati-Logkas Greece 1861 BC 95% higher than others with the same match, I also have other Greek samples, the oldest are two samples from 2827 BC, i'm from Gargano (north-east Apulia)

I assume that your 1861 BC sample is Log02…,
anch’io sono Pugliese, …di Lecce :)


83BABcT.jpg
 
@Kenshiro … Do you know your Haplogroups?
 
… new Deep Dive: ETR016 Siena Italy 470 AD

UCUtIWU.jpg


… the sample was added to ENA at a later date, … it’s missing at Vahaduo, though:

Code:
ETR016_Dod_K12b,4.72,0.00,3.51,0.00,29.85,11.84,0.90,1.90,14.59,1.16,31.53,0.00

ETR016_Dod_Globe13,0.00,2.20,0.55,1.63,18.17,0.00,39.19,0.24,0.00,19.83,17.70,0.00,0.50

ETR016_Dodecad_K7b,0.46,23.16,0.00,1.86,38.44,34.88,1.20
 
I have that too, but the first is Log04 with 95% (Largest chain 1046 SNP), Log02 instead is at 65%, then also Minoans, Samnites, two Viking samples from Foggia haha, very cool haha, in the map I also have a connection with the Greenland, I think it's the Normans, other Greek samples even more ancient, 2 samples of 2827 BC, è troppo figa sta cosa ahaha
This is modern population distance:
1. Greek (8.084)
2. Italian_Abruzzo (9.011)
3. Central_Greek (9.752)
4. West_Sicilian (10.21)
5. Albanian_Tosk (11.04)
6. East_Sicilian (11.14)
7. South_Italian (11.52)
8. Kosovar (12.04)
 
Slovenian samples taken from the supplementary material of ‘Cosmopolitanism at the Roman Danubian Frontier, Slavic Migrations, and the Genomic Formation of Modern Balkan Peoples’ paper now appear among my 125 top matches in the MTA, one of them at a distance less than 10.

3. Illyrian Slovenia
300 BC - Genetic Distance: 9.253 - I5692
48. Iron Age Obrezje Slovenia
301 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.01 - I5696
51. Iron Age Kapiteljska njive Slovenia
665 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.12 - I5691
52. Illyrian Slovenia
300 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.19 - I5693

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/bio...0.458211/DC4/embed/media-4.xlsx?download=true

I5689Slovenia_EIAM750-400 BCE898556Slovenia, Grofove njiveSlovenia45.91422415.4691Patterson et al., in submission
I5690Slovenia_EIAM750-400 BCE920296Slovenia, Grofove njiveSlovenia45.91422415.4691Patterson et al., in submission
I5691Slovenia_EIAM787-544 cal BCE (2518±28 BP, SUERC-69417)769301Slovenia, Novo mesto, Kapiteljska njiveSlovenia45.8120715.158908Patterson et al., in submission
I5692Slovenia_EIAF795-592 cal BCE (2550±15 BP, PSUAMS-3055)880797Slovenia, Ljublijana, Kongresni trgSlovenia46.05023714.50372Patterson et al., in submission
I5693Slovenia_EIAF796-570 cal BCE (2550±20 BP, PSUAMS-3092)881342Slovenia, Ljublijana, Kongresni trgSlovenia46.05023714.50372Patterson et al., in submission
I5694Slovenia_EIAM795-567 cal BCE (2545±20 BP, PSUAMS-3093)900855Metlika-HribSlovenia45.65265815.320159Patterson et al., in submission
I5687Slovenia_EIAM791-544 cal BCE (2525±31 BP, SUERC-69707)1031953Slovenia, Dolge njiveSlovenia45.86736615.279788Patterson et al., in submission
I5698Slovenia_EIAF776-539 cal BCE (2499±28 BP, SUERC-69422)934874Zagorje ob SaviSlovenia46.1371114.992415Patterson et al., in submission
I5686Slovenia_EIAM808-568 cal BCE (2569±30 BP, SUERC-69428)890836Slovenia, Dolge njiveSlovenia45.86736615.279788Patterson et al., in submission
I5696Slovenia_EIAM401-208 cal BCE (2281±29 BP, SUERC-69438)898211Slovenia, ObrežjeSlovenia45.84790815.690421Patterson et al., in submission
I5697Slovenia_EIAF901-805 cal BCE (2693±29 BP, SUERC-69436)849264Slovenia, ObrežjeSlovenia45.84790815.690421Patterson et al., in submission
 
Yes, J1a, but I suppose it is of Neolithic origin, because I have 0% Red Sea

Thanks Kenshiro, … my y Haplogroup is not very popular, I can count the Internet members of my final clade with one hand, … I thought that I was going to be J or R1b, but surprisingly I’m T1a2… (T-SK1480).

I also get i Vichinghi Foggiani :) … Top 10 Medieval Age:

Uf6ka5x.gif
 
… new Deep Dive: ETR016 Siena Italy 470 AD

UCUtIWU.jpg
ETR016 470 AD :
MTA 60 SNPs deep dive (default) vs 60 SNPs GedM… 1-to-1

… MTA Larg. Seg. 60.7 cM vs GedM 9 cM (5.4 Generations)

XVlhDk6.jpg
 
:unsure: … it depends on the settings, … also: the Data of ancient samples is often incomplete, … if you have a strong genetic affinity with an Ancient sample sometimes GedM gives you a generational estimate, … obviously it is only an indication of a positive genetic affinity.
 
… Vikings in my “Americas” map,
… maybe they’re the Foggia Vikings, or they’re related to them :)

Happy Thanksgiving

XIRgTJ8.jpg


v9q2I8E.jpg
 
Hello, my closest ancient populations
Roman (8.172)
Hellenic Roman + Roman (10.01)
Gallo-Roman + Hellenic Roman (10.78)
Roman Hispania + Roman (11.24)
Hellenic Roman + Roman Hispania (11.31)
Gallo-Roman + Roman (11.57)
Hellenic Roman (14.96)
Samnite (15.75)
Gallo-Roman (16.36)
Roman Hispania (16.45)
 
.

Sorry it wasn't it can you try with VK265 pls raw data
 
Hello,

Just tried Mytrueancestry and got the results below:

ANCIENT
Hellenic Roman + Roman (5.652)
Ancient Greek + Hellenic Roman (6.693)
Hellenic Roman + Thracian (6.876)
Roman + Hittite (6.994)
Hellenic Roman + Hittite (7.404)
Hellenic Roman (9.079)
Roman (12.93)
Ancient Greek (13.62)
Hittite (14.91)
Thracian (15.84)

MODERN

1. South_Italian (3.346)
2. East_Sicilian (5.201)
3. Central_Greek (5.305)
4. Greek_Crete (6.273)
5. Italian_Jewish (7.485)
6. Greek_Islands (7.606)
7. Ashkenazi (8.316)
8. Italian_Abruzzo (8.665)

I'm just wondering if it's common to get also top match with ancient relatives? or they are just trying to get people to upgrade?


Hellenic Roman Marcellino 400 AD

You are the #8 top match to this sample!


Tuscan Medieval Villa Magna Italy 905 AD


You are the #10 top match to this sample!


Thanks!

@Italian7 … yes, it’s common … we were already using GedMatch One-to-One with ancient samples long before the MTA “Ancient Relatives” came to be … :)


 
my new top in neolitihic ...............with number 20 which is zero match ?????

13. Copper Age Szigetszentmiklos Hungary
2350 BC - Genetic Distance: 10.09 - I7043
Top 98 % match vs all users

20. Bronze Age Bulgaria
3000 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.17 - I2165
Top 0 % match vs all users

54. Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol
2775 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.18 - I3499
Top 97 % match vs all users

I2165, Bronze Age, 3020-2895 calBCE
http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2017/05/09/135616
doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/135616
I2165
mtDNA: T2f
Y-DNA: I2a2a1b1b



Balkans_BronzeAge I2165: Y-hg I2a2a1b1b mt-hg T2f 3020-2895 calBCE

Yamnaya_Bulgaria Bul4: Y-hg I2a2a1b1b mt-hg ? 3012-2900 calBCE


Both samples are from burial sites in present-day South-Central Bulgaria. Apart from sharing I2a2a1b1b, they each pack a fair bit of Yamnaya-related ancestry and are dated to a very similar time period. Unlike Bul4, I2165 does not make the cut archaeologically as a Yamnaya sample, but he does come from a Tumulus (Kurgan-like) burial, so perhaps he's from a group influenced by Yamnaya?
 
My MTA Slovenians

3. Illyrian Slovenia
300 BC - Genetic Distance: 9.253 - I5692

5. Iron Age Slovenia
500 BC - Genetic Distance: 9.777 - I5698

51. Iron Age Obrezje Slovenia
301 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.01 - I5696

54. Iron Age Kapiteljska njive Slovenia
665 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.12 - I5691

55. Illyrian Slovenia
300 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.19 - I5693

2oOwbk1.png

kDghQF8.png

0FRimA2.png

NzGoo7r.png

oqGKAvL.png
 
Gaul + Kievan Rus (6.093)
Frank + Kievan Rus (7.904)
Scythian + Gaul (7.945)
Thuringii + Kievan Rus (8.155)
Scythian + Frank (9.173)
Scythian (9.318)
Gaul (13.97)
Thuringii (16.24)
Frank (16.43)
Kievan Rus (16.68)

1
. Croatian (5.145)
2. Moldavian (5.259)
3. Serbian (6.204)
4. Slovenian (6.442)
5. Austrian (7.214)
6. Hungarian (7.428)
7. Bosnian (8.283)
8. Romanian (8.788)



Your closest Archaeogenetic matches

1. Visigoth Mixed Slav Girona
550 AD - Genetic Distance: 6.699
Top 100 % match vs all users


2. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 9.318
Top 98 % match vs all users



3. Western-Scythian Black Sea
290 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.88
Top 97 % match vs all users


4. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 12.68
Top 0 % match vs all users



5. Bronze Age Bulgaria
3000 BC - Genetic Distance: 13.0
Top 0 % match vs all users


6. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 13.39
Top 94 % match vs all users



7. Cisalpine Gaul
590 AD - Genetic Distance: 13.97
Top 82 % match vs all users

8. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 14.41
Top 96 % match vs all users



9. Ancient Middle Helladic Elati-Logkas Greece
1861 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.52
Top 96 % match vs all users


10. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 14.92
Top 89 % match vs all users



11. Western Pomerania Unetice
2000 BC - Genetic Distance: 15.31
Top 82 % match vs all users


12. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 15.36
Top 91 % match vs all users



13. Medieval Tyrolian
580 AD - Genetic Distance: 15.44
Top 59 % match vs all users


14. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 15.49
Top 90 % match vs all users



15. Early Bronze Age Mednikarovo Bulgaria
2960 BC - Genetic Distance: 15.62
Top 98 % match vs all users


16. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 15.82
Top 90 % match vs all users



17. Medieval Germany Krakauer Berg Peissen
1140 AD - Genetic Distance: 16.01
Top 91 % match vs all users


18. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 16.24
Top 64 % match vs all users



19. Medieval Tyrolian
590 AD - Genetic Distance: 16.31
Top 57 % match vs all users


20. [Hidden] - upgrade to Footman+ 16.37
Top 82 % match vs all users


You have ancient relatives! (you share identified DNA segments)


Byzantine Roman Warrior 605 AD NS3b

mtDNA: [Upgrade to see] Y-DNA [Upgrade to see] cr Shared DNA: (Sample Quality 37) 2 SNP chains (min. 60 SNPs) /10.73 cM Largest chain:104 SNPs /7.2 cM
Your raw DNA is 73% closer than other matching users


Are these ancient relatives actually your relatives?





 

This thread has been viewed 1253283 times.

Back
Top