Mytrueancestry.com

... comparing to the Skeleton Lake Travelers closest to my Haplogroups:

xOiqx37.jpg


... and R1283 (Medieval Cancelleria Basilica):
AOJJ5OO.jpg


:unsure: ... my Ancient Greeks and the Thracian got demoted, ...
 
Last edited:
... found an almost Salentino with my mtDNA from modern Apulia :cool-v:

msF8lia.jpg
 
repetead......
 
... let’s see how these five “VK Medieval Apulians” stack up against a contemporary Apulian,

Foggia Vikings vs Salento :grin:

QTybrbH.jpg

ZUg1LoQ.jpg
 
Last edited:
in the comparisons above I lost Ancient Greeks and Thracian, ... though they’re both on the Ancient Ancestry Map,

... maybe they're slightly closer to those ancestries than me.

nDwn9D5.jpg
 
... edit ... :grin:

Yoi3nao.jpg


Sf750r6.gif
 
Last edited:
You remember that girl from Chiclana who was buried with a seashell and two plaster pearls. Isn't that sweet?

AncientBreackdown.jpeg


The same that is, La loma del puerco, because it turns out that I have made several comparisons with your kit and these others

That some of his relatives intervened in the Neolithic period in North Africa

ClosestAncientIBERIANPopulations.jpeg


That's the same thing, the one on the pig's back, in bronze, because I compared my kit with hers, she's in gray.

kitLomaversusKitm%25C3%25ADo.jpeg


Loma del Puerco vs San Julià de Ramis I19853

KitLomaSantJuliaI8053.JPEG.JPEG


Loma del Puerco vs Sant Julià de Ramis I10897

KitLomaSantJuliaI10897.JPEG.JPEG


La Loma del Puerco vs Cógotas (Vettones) ESP005

KitLomaCogotasESP005.JPEG


I am there lobbying and I think it has helped me to understand my modern results in FTDNA but I keep it to myself because right now it would be very difficult for me to expose it in an understandable way.
 
Closest group: Roman
(3334 shared SNPs):

2 Mausoleo Augusto, 2 Praenestina (Latin and Imperial), 2 Foggia, 3 Imperial Centocelle, 4 Collegno, 4 Szolad, 4 Villa Magna, 2 Casale del Dolce, 2 Tivoli Palace, 3 Marcellino, 3 Skeleton Lake Traveler, R850 Latin Ardea, Crypta Balbi, Celio Military H, Via Paisiello, Necropolis MR, San Ercolano, ANAS, Isola Sacra, Monterotondo, Hellenic Cordoba Caliphate, Minoans, Mycenaean, Oetzi, ...

XNTfNTh.jpg


CLONE TEST 1... 2 ... 3 ... :)
 
Last edited:
Octavius and I have one thing in common, ... sadly are not the Sestertii :grin:

... about natalis :)

ooWICGg.jpg


s9UYAbp.jpg
 
My grandparents and others of their generation, ... in dialect they often called money Sesterzi, ... but today, people hardly say that anymore, ... too bad :)
 
Posts # 3189 and 3190 are duplicates / clones, It's not the first time, if I edit one of them they both change, ... I only posted it once :innocent:
 
my father new #1


1. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 7.095 - MOK10
Top 99 % match vs all users



and




12. Copper Age Szigetszentmiklos Hungary
2350 BC - Genetic Distance: 9.543 - I7043
Top 99 % match vs all users
 
updated my new oldest ancient matches




12. Copper Age Szigetszentmiklos Hungary
2350 BC - Genetic Distance: 10.16 - I7043
Top 99 % match vs all users



40. Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol
2775 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.31 - I3499
Top 98 % match vs all users



49. Copper Age Augsburg Bavaria
2250 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.9 - I5017
Top 96 % match vs all users
 
R437 300 BC Latin Tribe Praeneste

EU K13 (Combined Kit)
Closest population distances

IT_Salento 0.522
IT_Sannio 0.550
IT_Apulia 0.638
Sicily 0.653
IT_Molise 0.696
IT_Puglia 0.701
IT_Campania 0.721
IT_Abruzzo 0.738

mbIsgIl.jpg



X3 Pugliese

R437 k36 Map:

GHtdi2h.jpg
 
my new matches ...............I don't know enough about mokrin serbia bronze-age



12. Copper Age Szigetszentmiklos Hungary
2350 BC - Genetic Distance: 10.16 - I7043
Top 99 % match vs all users



40. Proto Thracian/Illyrian Vucedol
2775 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.31 - I3499
Top 98 % match vs all users



49. Copper Age Augsburg Bavaria
2250 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.9 - I5017
Top 96 % match vs all users


[h=3]Early Bronze Age[/h]
ScandiaBronze.jpg


16. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.54 - MOK17
Top 99 % match vs all users



18. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 11.67 - MOK10
Top 95 % match vs all users



23. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 12.47 - MOK26
Top 97 % match vs all users



36. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.0 - MOK29
Top 86 % match vs all users



41. Illyrian / Dalmatian
1600 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.39 - I4332
Top 96 % match vs all users



42. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.45 - MOK9
Top 90 % match vs all users



47. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.87 - MOK33
Top 99 % match vs all users



50. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 14.92 - MOK20
Top 85 % match vs all users



51. Illyrian / Dalmatian
1600 BC - Genetic Distance: 15.0 - I4331
Top 94 % match vs all users



58. Early Bronze Age Mokrin Necropolis Serbia
1950 BC - Genetic Distance: 15.39 - MOK21
Top 39 % match vs all users



the paper is below

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.05.18.101337v1.full.pdf
 
 
about post #3196

... 300 BC Latin R437 is a x3 Pugliese,
#1 IT_Salento

... what say you ? :)
 
about post #3196

... 300 BC Latin R437 is a x3 Pugliese,
#1 IT_Salento

... what say you ? :)

Salento: No doubt. Sicily representing itself well there as well, particularly the area in the NW where the Provinces of Trapani and Palermo border each other, or Palermo and Trapani pardon the pun.(y)
 

This thread has been viewed 1253207 times.

Back
Top