Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If CTS8489 is above CTS8862, and you are Negative for CTS8862, but Anthonius is positive for it, I wouldn't theorize any close relation to him, until it is discovered when the mutation first occurred.
(It could have past 10 years, or 100 years, or 500 years, ...)
If CTS8489 is above CTS8862, and you are Negative for CTS8862, but Anthonius is positive for it, I wouldn't theorize any close relation to him, until it is discovered when the mutation first occurred.
(It could have past 10 years, or 100 years, or 500 years, ...)
I come back to my post number 77
Has the age of CTS8862 in this new configuration been determined?
Showing the similarity between Hoff's Heddesdorf and Heddeghem / Haidingahaim was an afterthought. The other info I showed were items I have been accruing over time and was not prompted by any findings concerning Anthonius Hoff which could just be an interesting coincidence.
My first thought was how could the name Hoff have any possible connection to Hedau, Hedaux, Hede, Hedde, Hedou, Hedin, Hedon, Hedman, Haid, Hait or Heit but I had to stop and remind myself that I am a Walsh....LOL.
I have been unable to view my FTDNA Big Y Block Tree ever since the update. Problem might be on my end but either way it has thrown a monkey wrench into the works. I'm also still patiently waiting for the YFull Tree to finish their analysis.
I saw #77 earlier, but it’s a Paradox
if we follow that reasoning, Z19945 is above CTS8862, and we cannot be positive for CTS8862 too, but we are.
CTS8862 and CTS8489 are still equivalent on Ytree, and Z19945 is still at the same position as before,
maybe they will update the entire branch, and also move the Sardinian below with us.
@BMW I don’t see any dates from that end yet.
antonius Hoff is one step from me..........I noted this in other T thread
I saw #77 earlier, but it’s a Paradox
if we follow that reasoning, Z19945 is above CTS8862, and we cannot be positive for CTS8862 too, but we are.
CTS8862 and CTS8489 are still equivalent on Ytree, and Z19945 is still at the same position as before,
maybe they will update the entire branch, and also move the Sardinian below with us.
@BMW I don’t see any dates from that end yet.
I do not understand why we cannot be positive for both, z19945 just moves inbetween
Not the case as I think this treeTo be positive for both, and if you move Z19945 on top of CTS8862, than CTS8862 would become our Final.
Not the case as I think this tree
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haplogroup_T-L206_(Y-DNA)#/media/File:Phylogenetic_T-M184_tree.png
is the correct tree......with z19945 splitting off
FTDNA rearranged our branch a few days ago.
Maybe Yfull and others will do same.
In the T project ?
no, FTDNA url main site, and I go to the Y DNA Haplotree,
I get there by clicking the “Haplotree & SNPs” tab located under the Y-DNA Section in the Main Page.
(I did a few Y tests with FTDNA, so I Have access to it)
this below is a part of our updated branch by FTDNA:
The Phylogenetic T-M184 tree would appear to need reworking, as well.
A shame.....would be akin to redoing the Mona Lisa, imho.
I still think my branch would need to go to Wallonia - Flanders, though.
This thread has been viewed 61133 times.