Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Ecology | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
![]() |
Great site!
T1a-M70 is said to have entered Africa via the Nile. How did it spread in the Horn? Where is T1a1a?
https://indo-european.eu/2018/08/mig...istinct-y-dna/
of the T haplogroup in this paper 90% had blue eyes and origins are on the black sea eastern side..............further info is that the remainder/living departed along the southern anatolian
I will look for other paper..............I already attached it in the past, but lost link when I reinstalled windows 10
It is to do with T1a1-Pages0021
I don't remember where, but I read that y T entered the Horn of Africa twice.
From West-Asians during the Neolithic, and in the last millennium until about 300 years ago with the Arab slave traders.
I think the clades were also different.
Official paper?
Do you remember the subject header? I'll look for it.
T came off the Pamir before heading off in three basic directions.
The largest is the T1a (so far). Those would be the NE African ones. The Ts that went into Melanesia would explain why so many have dark skin, but blue eyes & sometimes blond hair. Whoever they may have interbred with would have modified that original template.
I’m not posting it, search for: arab slave traders.
but I’ll post this:
Early Back-to-Africa Migration into the Horn of Africa
Genetic studies have identified substantial non-African admixture in the Horn of Africa (HOA). In the most recent genomic studies, this non-African ancestry has been attributed to admixture with Middle Eastern populations during the last few thousand years.
However, mitochondrial and Y chromosome data are suggestive of earlier episodes of admixture ...
... T-M70 sub-haplogroup was present in northeast Africa by at least 14 ka, possibly arriving in the Horn of Africa as early as 5 ka ....
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/art.../#!po=0.189394
its in earlier posts in eupedia
It was an academia paper based on cruciani's and others works..........https://www.nature.com/articles/ejhg2009231
Just discovered this site, actually. Thanks for this R paper! The greening of the Sahara is part of the puzzle we seem to be missing. T looks widespread, but may be missing all the people that most likely lived in this area before desertification. It might actually stretch from the North Africa/Sahel region to the Himalayas.
Ancient humans were working with narrow corridors during certain climate ages. Given that T is 40-47K YBP... and that it is downstream from LT and also F... perhaps their movements happened many times over; going into whatever land had the most hospitable climate for human habitation.
With the many hap. P and proto P found in siberia recently it would seem that K2 is close to east asian lands and we T who are their cousins as in hap K1 would be central asian as recent scholars have noted.
There is a lot of T found in kazaks by russian scholars in the last few years
y-P formed in Siberia? Last I remember, some said it mutated in the northern Philippine Islands.
Basal T in Kazaks? Or, downstream?
I am interested MOST, right now, in the mountainous DNA from the Himalayas (and that T-M184 paper re: Bhutan), Hindu Kush, Tian Shan, Kunlun, Karakoram, Suleman & Hindu Raj. This "Central Asian" mountain range is where basal T is said to have begun; radiating (pretty much) to the southeast and west.
Know any??
In all of Bulgaria, the % only goes as high as 5.8.
I see a pattern: T seems to be low volume, but it goes along with another major haplogroup... like E1b1b in East Africa (for example)... and then ends up as the ruling class. This dawned on me when I was looking at info re: the Bulgarian king. T is in the ruling classes of Saudi Arabia & (separately) in East Africa... the "Cushites", who speak Cushitic (Cushites came WAY BEFORE Semitic Arabs).
If T got to East Africa circa 10 millennia ago, then it arrived before the dawn of known high African civilisation & was probably the group who ushered it in. E1b1b (quite possibly) became the native class with its first rulers coming from the T1a people.
T entered africa , firstly in coastal egypt circa 9000BC .......................IIRC it did not reach the horn of Africa until the late bronze-age IIRC.............there is an old DNA study on this
Lemba jews reached yemen circa 2500BC from northern Levant, they came without women, crossed into africa and migrated to south africa where they married southern african women
AI put that M70 at 13,000 BCE & had at least one pit stop (for L-208) in the Greek island of Crete (by 10,000 BCE) & then back to the North African mainland.
The Lemba story was, indeed, interesting. Anything beyond 1,500 BCE is paganism, so they must have progressed (with their cult) at some point after that.
"Semitic" comes after "Cushitic". There are Ashkenazi Jews downstream from HOA Ts.
Last edited by Andalusian Fusion; 20-06-19 at 01:47.
ID Y-DNA Population Language Culture Date(ybp) Location Members/SS Percentage mtDNA Autosomal SNPs Ancestral Components Sample Source Notes I0795 - KAR6a - Feature 170 T1a-M70 Early European Neolithic Paleo-European Linearbandkeramik 7200 Karsdorf 1/1 100% H1* 47804 Western European Hunter-Gatherer and Basal Eurasian Tooth [187] Goseck circle
Perhaps... he went NORTH into Europe from the Sinai at a later date? After T1a-M70 (13,800 B.C.E.), my L-208 lineage goes to Crete in 10,100 B.C.E., only to return to the North African coast (Egypt) by around 6,700 B.C.E.
Their arrival circa 6,700 B.C.E. places them into a Cushitic-speaking world. Semitic languages would not diverge from Cushitic until around 3,700 years later; all of these, rooted in hieroglyphics (Kmt) & then the Phoenicians who gave us the alphabet by the 2nd Millennium.
"Northern Afro-Asiatic" language would not exist until at least 1,200 years after their return to North Africa from Crete & they align more or less with the emergence of Cushitic in the Afro-Asiatic heartland (in the SOUTH). If they spoke a Cushitic-type language, they would have left this mark upon Egypt as they made their way up the Nile to the HOA, ultimately leaving their cultural imprint there as they pushed the Khoisan further south.
Last edited by Andalusian Fusion; 20-06-19 at 02:17.
"Judaism" would have begun circa 1,900 B.C.E. with "Abraham". As a NATION of 600,000 men, the Israelites (not necessarily 'Jews' yet) would have had their origins when "Jacob" & his issue (12 children & 70 grandkids) spent over 2 centuries in Egypt as enslaved ISRAELITES.
As a "religion", most of the "10 Commandments"- which come from Spell 125 of the Egyptian Book of the Dead- were presented as a Mosaic revelation at Mount Sinai (circa 1,500 B.C.E.). They wandered the Sinai desert & studied the Torah afterwards. The first 3:"I am the Lord, thy God." / "Thou shall have no other Gods before me." / "Thou shall not worship any graven images or idols" are the only ones which go AGAINST Egyptian religiosity.
The Egyptian Book of the Dead, as a whole, began to be circulated on papyrus around 1,550 B.C.E. 1 plus 1 is 2 here. In those 50 or so years, it was not long before said Spell 125 from the Egyptian Book of the Dead would begin to be used as a foundation to describe the 210 years the Israelites spent in Egypt. "Judaism" used the Spell 125 framework as its morality code; taken from a papyrus which began as inscriptions on tomb walls in 2,345 B.C.E. (as King Unas' "Pyramid Texts").
If you add the Egyptian "beginnings", then... yes... it would be that far back. As far as many of these clades go (from T-L208 & upstream), we are talking even beyond that. In many of these places... the T clades appear to be AHEAD of major civs: predates Minoan Civ by several thousand years (T-L162)... Pre-Dynastic Kmt (T-L208)... Axum... Kush... etc. Ts were driving forces. They were doing what the "Game of Thrones" guy in Bulgaria was doing: running some form of colony (farmers and/or otherwise).
What about I0797
T-M70, mtdna H46b
7125 ybp.....karsdorf.....from Unstruttal
And the 3rd sample is KARS537 from karsdorf similar period......T1a1-L162
Your looking at that new plotting site by the Russian
He had my snp originally in north Switzerland.....it is now near Bordeaux France........he has still not finished his plotting.......try the other one
Those two images are of mine (L-208). When I put in the sample from Germany. It comes back as Greece.
T_Y63197.jpg
Both are the same here (Y63197).
Individual remains I0795 KAR6 I0797 KAR16a ID I0795 KAR6 Feature 170 Musm.no. 2006:14423a I0797 KAR16a Feature 611 Musm.no. 2004:26374a Y DNA T1a1a2-Y63197 T1a1a2-Y63197 Population Early EN Early EN Language Paleo-European Paleo-European Culture LBK LBK Date (YBP) 7076 ± 90 7087 ± 725 House / Location S / Karsdorf H / Karsdorf Members / Sample Size 1/2 1/2 Percentage 50% 50% mtDNA H1* or H1au1b H46b Isotope Sr Native to Unstruttal Native to Unstruttal Eye color Likely gray or blue eyes Likely gray or blue eyes Hair color Likely non-dark hair Likely non-red hair Skin pigmentation Rs1042602 (C;C) ABO Blood Group Likely O or B Rs8176719 (T;T) Diet (d13C%0 / d15N%0) -20.0 / 9.0 (higher Animal Protein) -20.2 / 9.1 (higher Animal Protein) FADS activity rs174554 (A;A) rs174574 (A;A) Lactase Persistence Likely lactose-intolerant Oase-1 Shared DNA 34.06% 18.06% Ostuni1 Shared DNA 12.49% 2.43% Neanderthal Vi33.26 Shared DNA 3.81% 1.08% Neanderthal Vi33.25 Shared DNA 2.13% 1.79% Neanderthal Vi33.16 Shared DNA 1.71% 0% Ancestral Component (AC) Neolithic Anatolia/Southeast Europe: 70.56%, Caucasus Hunter / Early European Farmer: 19.86%, Scandinavian / West European Hunter: 9.34%, Paleolithic Levant (Natufians): 0.24% Neolithic Anatolia/Southeast Europe: 56.23%, Paleolithic Levant (Natufians): 16.56%, Caucasus Hunter / Early European Farmer: 14.19%, Scandinavian / West European Hunter: 9.64%, Neolithic Iran: 2.54% puntDNAL K12 Ancient 59% Anatolia Neolithic Farmer + 24% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer+ 10% European Hunter-Gatherer + 7% Near Eastern 60% Anatolia Neolithic Farmer + 27% European Hunter-Gatherer + 9% Near Eastern + 2% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer + 2% Sub-Saharan Dodecad [dv3] 69.1% Mediterranean + 21% West European + 10% Southwest Asian 64.2% Mediterranean + 17.4% West European + 10.5% Southwest Asian+ 4.2% West Asian + 3.7% Northwest African Eurogenes [K=36] 56.9% Italian + 31.9% West Mediterranean + 6.3% Iberian + 2.1% Basque + 1.3% North African + 0.9 East Balkan + 0.3% East Mediterranean + 0.3% Arabian 37.1% Italian + 21% West Mediterranean + 16.9% Iberian + 11.8 East Balkan + 7.7% Armenian + 5.5% East Mediterranean + 0.05% North African Dodecad [Globe13] 67.4% Mediterranean + 16.5% Southwest Asian + 16% North European 61% Mediterranean + 19.7% Southwest Asian + 19.2% North European Genetic Distance 98.6cM in chr 8 98.6cM in chr 8 Parental Consanguinity MRCA = 1.1 generations MRCA = 1.1 generations Age at Death 45-60 24-26 Death Position Flexed Left Stretched Dorsal SNPs 107.480 95.833 Read Pairs 5.279.657 7.128.606 Sample Tooth / Rib Tooth / Rib Source [1][2][3] [1][2][3] Notes Goseck circle Goseck circle
As for the mtDNAs of each:
Frequencies of haplogroup H1 in the world (Ottoni et al. 2010)
Region or Population H1% No. of subjects Libyan Tuareg 61 129 Basques (Spain) 27.8 108 Portugal 25.5 499 Andalusia 24.3 103 Pasiegos (Cantabria) 23.5 51 Tuareg (West Sahel) 23.3 90 Berbers (Morocco) 20.2 217 Spain (miscellaneous) 18.9 132 Finland 18 78 Sardinia 17.9 106 Galicia 17.7 266 Basques (France) 17.5 40 Slovak (East) 16.8 137 Estonia 16.7 114 Western Sahara 14.8 128 Béarnaise 14.8 27 Slovak (West) 14.2 70 Catalonia 13.9 101 Volga-Ural Finnic speakers 13.6 125 Russia 13.5 312 Berbers (Tunisia) 13.4 276 France 12.3 106 Morocco 12.2 180 Italy (north) 11.5 322 Hungary 11.3 303 Czech Republic 10.8 102 Tunisia 10.6 269 Austria 10.6 2487 Sicily 10 90 Ukraine 9.9 191 Mozabite 9.8 80 Romania 9.4 360 Poland 9.3 86 Caucasus (north) 8.8 68 Netherlands 8.8 34 Italy (south) 8.7 206 Croatia 8.3 84 Slovaks 7.6 119 Macedonia 7.1 252 Mauritania 6.9 102 Italy (center) 6.3 208 Greece (mainland) 6.3 79 Germany 6 100 Balkans 5.4 111 Northwestern Caucasus 4.7 234 Karachay-Balkars 4.4 203 Lebanese 4.2 167 Druze 3.4 58 Turks 3.3 360 Albania 2.9 105 Daghestan 2.5 269 Ossetians 2.4 296 Caucasus (south) 2.3 132 Armenians 2.3 175 Iraq 1.9 206 Yakuts 1.7 58 Lithuania 1.7 180 Jordanians 1.7 173 Greece (Aegean islands) 1.6 247 Siwas (Egypt) 1.1 184 Georgians 1 193 Arabian Peninsula (incl. Yemen, Oman) 0.8 493 Central Asia 0.7 445 Dubai (United Arab Emirates) 0.4 249 Senegal 0 100 Fulani (Chad–Cameroon) 0 186 Cameroon 0 142 Chad 0 77 Buduma (Niger) 0 30 Nigeria 0 69 Ethiopia 0 82 Amhara (Ethiopia) 0 90 Oromo (Ethiopia) 0 117 Sierra Leone 0 155 Guineans (Guiné Bissau) 0 372 Mali 0 83 Kikuyu (Kenya) 0 24 Benin 0 192 Pakistan 0 100 Saami 0 57 Arabian Peninsula 0 94 Syrians 0 159 Africa Asia Caucasus Europe Middle East
As for the 2nd one:
H4, H7 and H13
These H4, H7 and H13 sub-haplogroups are present in both Europe and West Asia; the H13 subclade is also found in the Caucasus. They are quite rare.
H4 is often found in the Iberian peninsula, the Maghreb, Finland, Britain and Ireland.
H4 and H13, along with H2 account for 42% of the hg H lineages in Egypt.
He could have started further south & then went up... ending up in Germany. Given the equidistance of the Hs & the path his genes took... could it be his wife was Egyptian?? The high probability of "Libyan" is also there. This could have been a major route up into Europe & may have had people moving more frequently through it (wild guess here).
This is the first time I have looked over this information re: Karsdorf specimens. Feedback as I continue researching would be greatly appreciated at this time.