So even if that is true, it will not matter after all, genetic or not Macedonians are Greek no proof needed, considering they show up after Bronze Age collapse.
As for infraction, when you participate as a member on a discussion expect opposing opinions, or just moderate and do not express any opinion. Wearing multiple hats is not fair.
Sent from my iPhone using
Eupedia Forum
How you get from what he said to what you concluded is beyond me. You have to disconnect your hyper-patriotism and ethnic hatred of people, Greeks, who are your "cousins" genetically, at least some of them, and actually reason from what was said.
Do you have an ancient Paenonian sample? An ancient "Dorian" sample which you people also always argue about? How about a certifiable Macedonian sample?
When you have them we can compare all of them, including Mycenaean samples, and samples from the appropriate places just north of actual Greece, and from Classical Era Greece, and then we'd know wouldn't we?
What would you do if it upends everything you thought, as has happened to the pro-Herodotus supporters, for example? Would you accept the scientific evidence or would you try to find some way to deny it.
I don't see mainland Greeks having a nervous breakdown because the Islanders are closer to the Mycenaeans than they are.
You really have to get a grip.
Not everything we were told in kindergarten is true. Sad, in some cases, but the reality.
You insult another poster or you insult me, it's still worthy of an infraction.
That's the only recourse you seem to have.
Post FACTS, verifiable facts, and accept the facts posted by others and you'd have no problems here.