Carlos
Banned
- Messages
- 2,647
- Reaction score
- 700
- Points
- 0
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- E-V22/YF66572
- mtDNA haplogroup
- J1c5c1
I am a disgrace to humanity, laugh at the burning car wreck that is my life.
It's not you, it's the drink and other things.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I am a disgrace to humanity, laugh at the burning car wreck that is my life.
Look, you're on a site where we want people to base their interpretations on "SCIENCE" and "HISTORY", not agenda, myths and fantasy. If you're not going to read the science and history as it relates to the topic at hand, and have no interest in learning from the relevant scientific and historical material we present here, then what's the point pray tell?
All you're doing is repeating over and over again misunderstood information from t-rolls, or just dreaming up hypotheses with no basis in fact.
I don't know how old you are, but this is not kindergarten, and we're not your parents.
In the real world if you want someone to listen to your opinions they have to be informed ones.
We have a lot of problems in modern society precisely because young people are not held to the same standards that we had to meet.
You have to do your homework before forming opinions, and still those opinions will get criticized, and you have to learn from the criticism too instead of just having hurt feelings. The thing not to do is to ignore the facts and to refuse to absorb where you went wrong. If you want to challenge the facts with different facts that's fine, but that's not what you're doing.
I complained about my post graduate education, saying it was too tough, the professors too unfeeling. Nobody wants to see 25 year old men crying under interrogation. You know what? They were like Mama Bear compared to what I had to deal with at work.
It was good preparation.
Even parents have to practice "tough love" more than occasionally. You're not always going to be around to act as protector. You have to teach them how to function in the real world without you when the time comes, and that means facing the consequences of the things they do, although it probably hurts you as much if not more than them.
@AngelaIf my memory serves, I don't get good Oracle results with v3, btw, but I suppose the problem may be just the abscence of more "populations", as North Italians (my closest in K15).
What it concerns me, as usual, is the lack of accuracy. All these tools are inaccurate, even academic papers sometimes are, but MTA is really very inaccurate.
Since I see that MTA is a little game that people like, I don't want to be the usual party pooper, so I leave the party.
Another high-resolution subset of inscriptions (161 of over 41,000 inscriptions that are dated to a specific year in the 6th century) from late antique Rome shows a spike in inscriptions in 543 and a subsequent decline (Fig. 8). While some have seen in this evidence for plague (21), temporal correlation is insufficient to confirm a connection. The only direct evidence for plague in Rome in this period is a one-line reference to “a great pestilence [that] ravaged the land of Italy” in 543 in the continuation of the chronicler Marcellinus (39). This epidemic coincided with the Gothic Wars, which devastated Italy in the early and mid-540s. Rome was besieged several times, notably from 545 to 546, causing famine as well as deaths due to warfare. Procopius, who reports on the siege in detail, claims that only 500 local men (likely an underestimate) remained in the city after it (26). These political–military factors more readily explain the absence of inscriptions in the late 540s and early 550s. An additional dataset of ∼31,000 inscriptions from Spain includes only 40 that can be precisely dated within an annual resolution, but nonetheless does not show a substantial decline in inscriptions beginning in the 540s (Fig. 9).
https://www.pnas.org/content/early/2019/11/26/1903797116#sec-1
Eurogenes K15 PCA plot with Iron Age samples only
Their G25 distances
R60
R57
R59
R54
R52
They're all part of the same paper.
700ien-700en | % | ||
I2a | 2 | 4,7 | |
I1 | 1 | 2,3 | |
g2a2b | 7 | 16,3 | |
R1b | 7 | 16,3 | |
R1a | 1 | 2,3 | |
R2a | 1 | 2,3 | |
J | 1 | 2,3 | |
J1 | 6 | 14,0 | 44,2 |
J2a | 9 | 20,9 | |
J2b | 3 | 7,0 | |
E1b1b | 2 | 4,7 | |
T1a | 2 | 4,7 | |
H2 | 1 | 2,3 | |
TOTAL | 43 | 100,0 |
I noticed that the haplogroup J appears suddenly after 700 BCE and at a very large proportion of 46,3% between 700 BCE - 700 CE. How is that possible?
700bce-700ce %
I2a 2 4,9
I1 1 2,4
G2a2b 7 17,1
R1b 5 12,2
R1a 1 2,4
R2a 1 2,4
J 1 2,4
J1 6 14,6 46,3 J2a 9 22,0 J2b 3 7,3 E1b1b 2 4,9
T1a 2 4,9
H2 1 2,4
TOTAL 41 100,0
In Imperial Rome is 56% !
This below is the imperial numbers......where did you get the repulican numbers ?
Imperial Rome based on 24 samples from Antonio et al:
29.1 % J2a-M410 7
20.8 % G2a2 5
16.6 % J1a 4
8.3 % R1b 2
4.1 % J2b-M241 1
4.1 % J2b-M205 1
4.1 % T1a 1
4.1 % R1a 1
4.1 % R2a 1
4.1 % E1b-v12 1
700 BCE-700 CE | % | ||
I2a | 2 | 4,7 | |
I1 | 1 | 2,3 | |
G2a2b | 7 | 16,3 | |
R1b | 7 | 16,3 | |
R1a | 1 | 2,3 | |
R2a | 1 | 2,3 | |
J | 1 | 2,3 | |
J1 | 6 | 14,0 | 44,2 % |
J2a | 9 | 20,9 | |
J2b | 3 | 7,0 | |
E1b1b | 2 | 4,7 | |
T1a | 2 | 4,7 | |
H2 | 1 | 2,3 | |
TOTAL | 43 | 100,0 |
I didn't want to comment anymore but was adressed directly.
Yes, CTS6190 has been found in a turkish guy who says he has Albanian origins. We also have clades other than z638, which has tmrca of 4200 ybp, so its not some young founder effect.
On Yfull, under CTS6190 there are four Portuguese, one Italian, one Dutch, one British, one Russian. There's not a single Albanian.
This thread has been viewed 366669 times.