Vahaduo NEW! All Gedmatch calculators on Vahaduo ON-LINE

This time I get better matches than all of you, i can't always lose :giggle: Distance: 2.0202%. 17.7.

Distance to:Juan
17.74995493I0559_QLB15D_Baalberge_MN_Quedlinburg_IX_Germany_3645-3537_calBCE
20.10197751I0560_QLB18A_Baalberge_MN_Quedlinburg_IX_Germany_3640-3510_calBCE
20.23584196I0172_ESP24_Esperstedt_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3360-3086_calBCE
20.90076314I0406_Mina4_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
22.94212501I0408_Mina18_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
24.36251013I0405_Mina3_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
26.25983816I0407_Mina6_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
28.26423889I0022_LBK1976_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
29.21711314I0807_ESP30_Baalberge_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3887-3797_calBCE
29.38450782I0025_LBK1992_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
29.99218398I0056_HAL14_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5206-5052_calBCE
30.17544532I0046_HAL5_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5206-5004_calBCE
31.06484025I0100_HAL4_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5032-4946_calBCE
31.40982649I0057_HAL34_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5207-5067_calBCE
31.43425679I0659_HAL2_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5079-4997_calBCE
32.28410909I0048_HAL25_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5206-5052_calBCE
32.54585534I0413_Troc7_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5177-5068_calBCE
32.56844946I0026_LBK2155_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
32.56844946I0054_UWS4_LBK_EN_Unterwiederstedt_Germany_5209-5070_calBCE
32.71311358I0410_Troc3_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5178-5066_calBCE
33.30634174I0409_Troc1_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5311-5218_calBCE
35.50773578I0176_SZEH4_LBKT_EN_Szemely-Hegyes_Hungary_5210-4940_calBCE
36.62423924I0795_KAR6_LBK_EN_Karsdorf_Germany_5207-5070_calBCE
37.51375881I0174_BAM25_Starcevo_EN_Alsónyék-Bátaszék_Mérnöki_telep_Hungary_5710-5530_calBCE
38.46820765I0821_HAL24_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5034-4942_calBCE
44.41933025I0412_Troc5_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5310-5206_calBCE
50.51135813I0439_SVP52_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3305-2925_calBCE
62.09770769I0016_Molta9_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
62.27025373I0443_SVP57_Yamnaya_Lopatino_II_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3500-2700_BCE
62.63087657I0013_Molta3_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
63.09978685I0357_SVP5_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3090-2910_calBCE
65.14828087I0370_SVP10_Yamnaya_Ishkinovka_I_Eastern_Orenburg_Pre-Ural_steppe_Samara_3500-2700_BCE_Russia
65.35273904I0438_SVP50_Yamnaya_Luzkhi_I_Samara_River_Samara_Russia_3021-2635_calBCE
65.67887027I0231_SVP3_Yamnaya_Ekaterinovka_Southern_Steppe_Samara_Russia_2910-2875_calBCE
66.27236000I0011_Molta1_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
67.05947733I0429_SVP38_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3339-2917_calBCE
67.18067430I0441_SVP54_Yamnaya_Kurmanaevka_III_Buzuluk_Samara_Russia_3010-2622_calBCE
68.36142406I0012_Molta2_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
68.49030442I0015_Molta6_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
69.09947684I0014_Molta4_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
72.14151856I0124_SVP44_Samara_HG_Lebyanzhinka_IV_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_5650-5555_calBCE
74.48639137I0017_Molta12_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
74.95929762I0061_UzOO74_Karelia_HG_Yuzhnyy_Oleni_Ostrov_Karelia_Russia_5500-5000_BCE

Target: Juan
Distance: 2.0202% / 2.02023645
51.6I0407_Mina6_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
17.6I0231_SVP3_Yamnaya_Ekaterinovka_Southern_Steppe_Samara_Russia_2910-2875_calBCE
8.4I0408_Mina18_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
5.4I0011_Molta1_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
4.6I0025_LBK1992_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
3.8I0807_ESP30_Baalberge_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3887-3797_calBCE
3.4I0016_Molta9_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
2.8I0026_LBK2155_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
1.8I0017_Molta12_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
0.6I0054_UWS4_LBK_EN_Unterwiederstedt_Germany_5209-5070_calBCE
 
Torzio: Wow I did not know that I0795 is the oldest neolithic sample found to date, and in Germany, hmm.. Really good to know. I wonder if the Neolithic EEF being more dominate in Central Europe vs further North towards Denmark and Scandanavia where more I guess Hunter gather (WHG, EHG, etc) were still dominate impacted the the Steppe migrants on the route further South who crossed into Italy I guess around modern Veneto. Given all of these hits those of us of Italian ancestry from all over Italy are getting with the Roman samples, it suggest to me, not making this as a dogmatic statement, that the migrants who brought in Latin into Italy also had some significant neolithic European ancestry (EEF) and thus did not substantially change the DNA present in Italy before those steppe migrants arrived.

Am I off base with my hypothesis?

Further info is that they are hunters chasing the red deer of northern germany
There are papers on this group , also found was ydna H and C with these T
 
This time I get better matches than all of you, i can't always lose :giggle: Distance: 2.0202%. 17.7.

Distance to:Juan
17.74995493I0559_QLB15D_Baalberge_MN_Quedlinburg_IX_Germany_3645-3537_calBCE
20.10197751I0560_QLB18A_Baalberge_MN_Quedlinburg_IX_Germany_3640-3510_calBCE
20.23584196I0172_ESP24_Esperstedt_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3360-3086_calBCE
20.90076314I0406_Mina4_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
22.94212501I0408_Mina18_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
24.36251013I0405_Mina3_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
26.25983816I0407_Mina6_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
28.26423889I0022_LBK1976_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
29.21711314I0807_ESP30_Baalberge_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3887-3797_calBCE
29.38450782I0025_LBK1992_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
29.99218398I0056_HAL14_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5206-5052_calBCE
30.17544532I0046_HAL5_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5206-5004_calBCE
31.06484025I0100_HAL4_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5032-4946_calBCE
31.40982649I0057_HAL34_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5207-5067_calBCE
31.43425679I0659_HAL2_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5079-4997_calBCE
32.28410909I0048_HAL25_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5206-5052_calBCE
32.54585534I0413_Troc7_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5177-5068_calBCE
32.56844946I0026_LBK2155_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
32.56844946I0054_UWS4_LBK_EN_Unterwiederstedt_Germany_5209-5070_calBCE
32.71311358I0410_Troc3_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5178-5066_calBCE
33.30634174I0409_Troc1_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5311-5218_calBCE
35.50773578I0176_SZEH4_LBKT_EN_Szemely-Hegyes_Hungary_5210-4940_calBCE
36.62423924I0795_KAR6_LBK_EN_Karsdorf_Germany_5207-5070_calBCE
37.51375881I0174_BAM25_Starcevo_EN_Alsónyék-Bátaszék_Mérnöki_telep_Hungary_5710-5530_calBCE
38.46820765I0821_HAL24_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5034-4942_calBCE
44.41933025I0412_Troc5_Spain_EN_Els_Trocs_Spain_5310-5206_calBCE
50.51135813I0439_SVP52_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3305-2925_calBCE
62.09770769I0016_Molta9_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
62.27025373I0443_SVP57_Yamnaya_Lopatino_II_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3500-2700_BCE
62.63087657I0013_Molta3_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
63.09978685I0357_SVP5_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3090-2910_calBCE
65.14828087I0370_SVP10_Yamnaya_Ishkinovka_I_Eastern_Orenburg_Pre-Ural_steppe_Samara_3500-2700_BCE_Russia
65.35273904I0438_SVP50_Yamnaya_Luzkhi_I_Samara_River_Samara_Russia_3021-2635_calBCE
65.67887027I0231_SVP3_Yamnaya_Ekaterinovka_Southern_Steppe_Samara_Russia_2910-2875_calBCE
66.27236000I0011_Molta1_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
67.05947733I0429_SVP38_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_3339-2917_calBCE
67.18067430I0441_SVP54_Yamnaya_Kurmanaevka_III_Buzuluk_Samara_Russia_3010-2622_calBCE
68.36142406I0012_Molta2_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
68.49030442I0015_Molta6_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
69.09947684I0014_Molta4_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
72.14151856I0124_SVP44_Samara_HG_Lebyanzhinka_IV_Sok_River_Samara_Russia_5650-5555_calBCE
74.48639137I0017_Molta12_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
74.95929762I0061_UzOO74_Karelia_HG_Yuzhnyy_Oleni_Ostrov_Karelia_Russia_5500-5000_BCE

Target: Juan
Distance: 2.0202% / 2.02023645
51.6I0407_Mina6_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
17.6I0231_SVP3_Yamnaya_Ekaterinovka_Southern_Steppe_Samara_Russia_2910-2875_calBCE
8.4I0408_Mina18_Spain_MN_La_Mina_Spain_3900-3600_BCE
5.4I0011_Molta1_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
4.6I0025_LBK1992_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
3.8I0807_ESP30_Baalberge_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3887-3797_calBCE
3.4I0016_Molta9_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
2.8I0026_LBK2155_LBK_EN_Viesenhäuser_Hof_Stuttgart-Mühlhausen_Germany_5500-4800_BCE
1.8I0017_Molta12_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
0.6I0054_UWS4_LBK_EN_Unterwiederstedt_Germany_5209-5070_calBCE

It's about what I would expect for Spaniards, i.e. the same or less Yamnaya than Italians, but more European WHG.

That's why, for example, Duarte and Carlos are closer to MN samples than to EN samples, whereas I'm closer to the EN samples, a whole raft of LBK ones coming before any of the MN ones. I'm also at a distance of 21 to the Italian Neolithic.

Maybe I did something wrong, however, because my overall distance is closer. What, did we hang out on our mountains until the 20th century? :)

This isn't a competition, Dou. I'm trying to figure out what makes these results possible.

This is with no distance column...About 70% early and middle Neolithic, which I get on most calculators.

Target: Angela
Distance: 1.2990% / 1.29897586
39.4I0174_BAM25_Starcevo_EN_Alsónyék-Bátaszék_Mérnöki_telep_Hungary_5710-5530_calBCE
17.0I0807_ESP30_Baalberge_MN_Esperstedt_Germany_3887-3797_calBCE
15.8I0821_HAL24_LBK_EN_Halberstadt-Sonntagsfeld_Germany_5034-4942_calBCE
10.2I0439_SVP52_Yamnaya_Lopatino_I_Sok_River_Samara_Ru ssia_3305-2925_calBCE
9.4I0015_Molta6_Motala_HG_Molata_Sweden_5898-5531_calBCE
6.0I0438_SVP50_Yamnaya_Luzkhi_I_Samara_River_Samara_R ussia_3021-2635_calBCE
2.2I0441_SVP54_Yamnaya_Kurmanaevka_III_Buzuluk_Samara _Russia_3010-2622_calBCE


It seems amazing to me that the program could get this close for me using just EEF and WHG and Yamnaya, with a whopping 55% just from the European EN, and then another 17% MN.
 
Further info is that they are hunters chasing the red deer of northern germany
There are papers on this group , also found was ydna H and C with these T

Torzio: Ok, so these were Hunter Gatherers who then settled down and intermarried with Neolithic Early European Farmers and changed culturally from Hunter Gatherers to Early Farmers, ( i..e adopted farming technology and moved away from the Hunter Gatherer lifestyle).
 
There's some confusion once again. Sample 10795 is a Neolithic farmer. Any hunter-gatherer in the sample would be a minor component.
 
Angela: Ok, thanks for that clarification. In my case, I would ex ante expect to cluster closer to populations, ancient or modern with predominantly Early European Farmer (Neolithic) ancestry. vs. WHG.
 
Torzio: Ok, so these were Hunter Gatherers who then settled down and intermarried with Neolithic Early European Farmers and changed culturally from Hunter Gatherers to Early Farmers, ( i..e adopted farming technology and moved away from the Hunter Gatherer lifestyle).

There are papers on this , i will send privately...but there are three settlement, karsdorf, derenburg and halberstadt...karsdorf only had 20 adults
And 4 children found at the site...
Only admixture split officially i have seen states...70% anatolian, 20% whg/eef, 9% scandinavian whg, dregs levant
 
There are papers on this , i will send privately...but there are three settlement, karsdorf, derenburg and halberstadt...karsdorf only had 20 adults
And 4 children found at the site...
Only admixture split officially i have seen states...70% anatolian, 20% whg/eef, 9% scandinavian whg, dregs levant

Ok thanks, the 70% Anatolian makes sense given how Raveane et al (2019) paper indicates, all of Modern Italian DNA is characterized by a predominate source population from Ancient Anatolia (EEF). I would be surprised if I cluster that close to a WHG. I just went back and looked at my distance from I2158_WHG, which is the ancient Sicilian Hunter Gather found in Western Sicily who dates maybe to 10,000-12,000 BC I guess. My distance is 60.86 to that Sicilian_WHG, whereas to the Italian Bell Beaker Samples, I am 18.25 to I1979_Northern Italian Bell Beaker and 20.92 to I4930 Sicilian_Bell Beaker, which I think are more EEF ancestry vs. WHG or Steppe.
 
Ok thanks, the 70% Anatolian makes sense given how Raveane et al (2019) paper indicates, all of Modern Italian DNA is characterized by a predominate source population from Ancient Anatolia (EEF). I would be surprised if I cluster that close to a WHG. I just went back and looked at my distance from I2158_WHG, which is the ancient Sicilian Hunter Gather found in Western Sicily who dates maybe to 10,000-12,000 BC I guess. My distance is 60.86 to that Sicilian_WHG, whereas to the Italian Bell Beaker Samples, I am 18.25 to I1979_Northern Italian Bell Beaker and 20.92 to I4930 Sicilian_Bell Beaker, which I think are more EEF ancestry vs. WHG or Steppe.
Ask jovialis to upload the other 2 samples from the site...yhat way we can see if they are related plus find out if you match all three

Also if you run that sample through k36 you get 57% italian
 
It's about what I would expect for Spaniards, i.e. the same or less Yamnaya than Italians, but more European WHG.

That is also true but I have less of Yamnaya, at least with northern Italians.

I vs North Italians averages in G25.

TargetDistanceAnatolia_Barcin_NAnatolia_Tepecik_Ciftlik_NGambianHanIRN_Shahr_I_Sokhta_BA2MAR_IberomaurusianWHGYamnaya_RUS_Samara
Juan_scaled0.0479703755.40.01.20.61.24.210.027.4
Italian_Aosta_Valley0.0276770451.60.00.00.00.00.08.440.0
Italian_Bergamo0.0266172356.44.20.00.00.00.06.632.8
Italian_Liguria0.0332801436.223.60.20.00.01.26.232.6
Italian_Lombardy0.0310133650.611.00.00.00.00.05.832.6
Italian_Northeast0.0248724054.40.00.00.00.00.07.238.4
Italian_Piedmont0.0208535939.422.40.00.00.00.04.833.4
Italian_Trentino-Alto-Adige0.0244769857.40.00.00.00.00.08.034.6
Italian_Veneto0.0223467452.65.60.00.00.00.07.234.6
Swiss_Italian0.0201050336.224.00.00.60.00.25.034.0
Average0.0279212949.09.10.10.10.10.66.934.0
 
Salento: I think I0795 is 70% Anatolian if I read correctly, more EEF in the first part of the link you cited and then the note says they are 70% WHG and 30% Basal Eurasian. What am I missing here? There seems to be some inconsistency or am I totally "pazzo" in what I am reading.
 
Salento: I think I0795 is 70% Anatolian if I read correctly, more EEF in the first part of the link you cited and then the note says they are 70% WHG and 30% Basal Eurasian. What am I missing here? There seems to be some inconsistency or am I totally "pazzo" in what I am reading.

I am not home atm....but search for
Settlement burials at the karsdorf lbk site...by Guido Brandt and Corinna Knipper
 
Salento: I think I0795 is 70% Anatolian if I read correctly, more EEF in the first part of the link you cited and then the note says they are 70% WHG and 30% Basal Eurasian. What am I missing here? There seems to be some inconsistency or am I totally "pazzo" in what I am reading.

It’s not you or me ... it’s information on the same page that doesn’t match!

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karsdorf_remains
 
Thanks
Do you have 3rd sample as well

Strange how these sample is your number 1 and for me it is not

I0795 is the only Karsdorf sample in the Dod K12 Sample List (I think).

... why strange ???
 
They just inadvertently switched labels in one part of the article.

The left hand column is 10795.

Neolithic Anatolia/Southeast Europe: 70.56%, Caucasus Hunter / Early European Farmer: 19.86%, Scandinavian / West European Hunter: 9.34%, Paleolithic Levant (Natufians): 0.24%Neolithic Anatolia/Southeast Europe: 56.23%, Paleolithic Levant (Natufians): 16.56%, Caucasus Hunter / Early European Farmer: 14.19%, Scandinavian / West European Hunter: 9.64%, Neolithic Iran: 2.54%
puntDNAL K12 Ancient59% Anatolia Neolithic Farmer + 24% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer + 10% European Hunter-Gatherer + 7% Near Eastern60% Anatolia Neolithic Farmer + 27% European Hunter-Gatherer + 9% Near Eastern + 2% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer + 2% Sub-Saharan
Dodecad [dv3]69.1% Mediterranean + 21% West European + 10% Southwest Asian64.2% Mediterranean + 17.4% West European + 10.5% Southwest Asian + 4.2% West Asian + 3.7% Northwest African
Eurogenes [K=36]56.9% Italian + 31.9% West Mediterranean + 6.3% Iberian + 2.1% Basque + 1.3% North African + 0.9 East Balkan + 0.3% East Mediterranean + 0.3% Arabian37.1% Italian + 21% West Mediterranean + 16.9% Iberian + 11.8 East Balkan + 7.7% Armenian + 5.5% East Mediterranean + 0.05% North African
Dodecad [Globe13]67.4% Mediterranean + 16.5% Southwest Asian + 16% North European61% Mediterranean + 19.7% Southwest Asian + 19.2% North European


In K12b:
Distance to:Sample10795
20.85221331Morocco_Jews
21.20183483Sephardic_Jews
22.76941668France_Corsica
22.88848457Italy_Campania
22.95763870Italy_Calabria
23.84025168Ashkenazi
24.28752859Italy_Sicily
24.78945542Ashkenazy_Jews
24.79294536Italy_Abruzzo
25.06308636Italy_Marche
26.59511609Greek_Crete
26.65958034Italy_Lazio
26.68529932Italy_Romagna
27.27862914Italy_Apulia
27.43312979Italy_Tuscany
27.46214850Greek
28.65023440Italy_Emilia
28.94996356Italy_Liguria
29.29094741Cypriots
30.75898564Italy_Lombardy
30.79006008Sardinian
31.97452111Greek_Cappadocia
32.55293228Italy_Piedmont
33.03171355Nusayri_Turkey
33.26316127Italy_Veneto


From the beginning of the ancient dna revolution it was clear that European Jews had a lot of EEF.

This is why so much of what has been written about Italian genetics on blogs is absolute garbage. I said until I was blue in the face that this "Levantine" and Caucasus ancestry was in the Neolithic farmers, and that Italy, even without very recent migrations, would show some of it at least by the Copper and Bronze Age. Not to say more didn't arrive after that, but people think too linearly. Others have their own agendas.

A sample from Neolithic Germany already has all this S.W. Asian and Caucasus or Near Eastern or whatever they want to call it.
 
@Dou,
Any tool created by Davidski is going to inflate the amount of Yamnaya, and for moderns the amount of East European.
 
They just inadvertently switched labels in one part of the article.

The left hand column is 10795.

Neolithic Anatolia/Southeast Europe: 70.56%, Caucasus Hunter / Early European Farmer: 19.86%, Scandinavian / West European Hunter: 9.34%, Paleolithic Levant (Natufians): 0.24%Neolithic Anatolia/Southeast Europe: 56.23%, Paleolithic Levant (Natufians): 16.56%, Caucasus Hunter / Early European Farmer: 14.19%, Scandinavian / West European Hunter: 9.64%, Neolithic Iran: 2.54%
puntDNAL K12 Ancient59% Anatolia Neolithic Farmer + 24% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer + 10% European Hunter-Gatherer + 7% Near Eastern60% Anatolia Neolithic Farmer + 27% European Hunter-Gatherer + 9% Near Eastern + 2% Caucasus Hunter-Gatherer + 2% Sub-Saharan
Dodecad [dv3]69.1% Mediterranean + 21% West European + 10% Southwest Asian64.2% Mediterranean + 17.4% West European + 10.5% Southwest Asian + 4.2% West Asian + 3.7% Northwest African
Eurogenes [K=36]56.9% Italian + 31.9% West Mediterranean + 6.3% Iberian + 2.1% Basque + 1.3% North African + 0.9 East Balkan + 0.3% East Mediterranean + 0.3% Arabian37.1% Italian + 21% West Mediterranean + 16.9% Iberian + 11.8 East Balkan + 7.7% Armenian + 5.5% East Mediterranean + 0.05% North African
Dodecad [Globe13]67.4% Mediterranean + 16.5% Southwest Asian + 16% North European61% Mediterranean + 19.7% Southwest Asian + 19.2% North European


In K12b:
Distance to:Sample10795
20.85221331Morocco_Jews
21.20183483Sephardic_Jews
22.76941668France_Corsica
22.88848457Italy_Campania
22.95763870Italy_Calabria
23.84025168Ashkenazi
24.28752859Italy_Sicily
24.78945542Ashkenazy_Jews
24.79294536Italy_Abruzzo
25.06308636Italy_Marche
26.59511609Greek_Crete
26.65958034Italy_Lazio
26.68529932Italy_Romagna
27.27862914Italy_Apulia
27.43312979Italy_Tuscany
27.46214850Greek
28.65023440Italy_Emilia
28.94996356Italy_Liguria
29.29094741Cypriots
30.75898564Italy_Lombardy
30.79006008Sardinian
31.97452111Greek_Cappadocia
32.55293228Italy_Piedmont
33.03171355Nusayri_Turkey
33.26316127Italy_Veneto


From the beginning of the ancient dna revolution it was clear that European Jews had a lot of EEF.

This is why so much of what has been written about Italian genetics on blogs is absolute garbage. I said until I was blue in the face that this "Levantine" and Caucasus ancestry was in the Neolithic farmers, and that Italy, even without very recent migrations, would show some of it at least by the Copper and Bronze Age. Not to say more didn't arrive after that, but people think too linearly. Others have their own agendas.

A sample from Neolithic Germany already has all this S.W. Asian and Caucasus or Near Eastern or whatever they want to call it.


I agree, I am seriously beginning to wonder what is it with some of these Blogs that constantly talk about "Levantine" and Caucus Admixture in Italian populations and Greek, etc, and in particular modern Italians From Rome to Sicily, when it is more and more evident this DNA was already in Europe well before any recent migrations that the Moots Roman paper documented. The narrative for years on the internet and youtube is that these Iron Age Romans were 100% Steppe and recent admixture from the Middle East changed the phenotypes from Viking looking blonde hair and blue eyed with Fitzpatrick Type 1 skin tone to Brown/Dark hair, brown eyed and Say Fitzpatrick Type 3 skin tone, etc. I think that narrative is piece by piece being put to rest.
 
Torzio: I did a search and the Brandt and Knipper published a paper in 2014 in the Proceedings of the British Academy entitled "Settlement Burials at the Karsdorf LBK Site,Saxony-Anhalt, Germany" They report that the Karsdorf individuals have on average about 60% of their DNA from Neolithic sources and the and other contemporary LBK sites show 70-100% Neolithic. A full version of the paper can be found at Prof. Brandt's research Gate site.
 

This thread has been viewed 336565 times.

Back
Top