Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Insitome Podcast: Ancient Egyptian Genetics

  1. #1
    Advisor Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,691
    Points
    154,482
    Level
    100
    Points: 154,482, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 49.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    3 members found this post helpful.

    Insitome Podcast: Ancient Egyptian Genetics

    Just starting it now:

    https://insitome.libsyn.com/ancient-egyptian-genetics

    They also link this paper from 2017:
    Ancient Egyptian mummy genomes suggest an increase of Sub-Saharan African ancestry in post-Roman periods

    https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms15694

    Discussed here:

    https://www.eupedia.com/forum/thread...na-Kraus-et-al
    There can be no covenants between men and lions

  2. #2
    Moderator Achievements:
    Tagger Second ClassThree Friends25000 Experience PointsVeteran

    Join Date
    21-10-16
    Posts
    1,861
    Points
    33,880
    Level
    56
    Points: 33,880, Level: 56
    Level completed: 70%, Points required for next Level: 370
    Overall activity: 31.0%


    Ethnic group
    Multiracial Brazilian
    Country: Brazil



    I find it baffling that so little from Ancient Egypt and ancient North Africa as a whole has been studied. Is it really so hard or are there political and technical hurdles? Even Sub-Saharan Africa, which is generally more humid, has received a few interesting archaeogenomic studies in the last few years. Meanwhile, Egypt has only one autosomal DNA study (please, don't come here to mention that ridiculously weak and implausible DNA Tribe study that Afrocentrists relentlessly quote to "prove" their point).

  3. #3
    Advisor Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,691
    Points
    154,482
    Level
    100
    Points: 154,482, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 49.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by Ygorcs View Post
    I find it baffling that so little from Ancient Egypt and ancient North Africa as a whole has been studied. Is it really so hard or are there political and technical hurdles? Even Sub-Saharan Africa, which is generally more humid, has received a few interesting archaeogenomic studies in the last few years. Meanwhile, Egypt has only one autosomal DNA study (please, don't come here to mention that ridiculously weak and implausible DNA Tribe study that Afrocentrists relentlessly quote to "prove" their point).
    I recall during the podcast, they said the embalming method has made it exceedingly difficult. Because the process greatly damaged the DNA. However, I bet they could get something from the Petrous bone. But that would involve partially destroying the mummy. I'm not sure if that is actually a hurdle. But I'd imagine that museums and archaeologists are very cautious.

    Razib Khan and Spencer Wells did stress that the findings do indicate that Egyptians are mostly still related to their ancient ancestors. Interestingly, they also commented on how some nefarious actors on the internet try to distort the findings for their own agendas. They also made a point about how Ancient DNA compared to Modern DNA can be somewhat misleading, with the inferences that can be made by the data.

  4. #4
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1 year registered5000 Experience Points

    Join Date
    10-05-19
    Posts
    369
    Points
    5,175
    Level
    21
    Points: 5,175, Level: 21
    Level completed: 25%, Points required for next Level: 375
    Overall activity: 81.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    I2-M223/I-P78 clade
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H2A3

    Ethnic group
    Italian-Siicly-South
    Country: United States



    I listened to the podcast. Very good. The Ancient vs. Modern DNA was also interesting. People today look and see the modern DNA has some admixture not present dating back to 1,300 BC, which is how far the study went back, and conclude population replacement. As they noted, modern Egyptians are still related to the ancient ones from the periods the DNA was from, and estimated 80% or so. So there is a strong genetic continuity from the period studied (1,300 BC till today).

  5. #5
    Regular Member Achievements:
    1000 Experience PointsVeteran
    ihype02's Avatar
    Join Date
    12-10-16
    Posts
    396
    Points
    3,344
    Level
    16
    Points: 3,344, Level: 16
    Level completed: 74%, Points required for next Level: 106
    Overall activity: 6.0%


    Country: Albania



    ^ Are you sure it's 80%?

  6. #6
    Advisor Achievements:
    Three FriendsTagger First Class50000 Experience PointsVeteran
    Awards:
    Master Tagger
    Jovialis's Avatar
    Join Date
    04-05-17
    Location
    New York City
    Posts
    3,691
    Points
    154,482
    Level
    100
    Points: 154,482, Level: 100
    Level completed: 0%, Points required for next Level: 0
    Overall activity: 49.0%

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b1a1a2b1 (R-F1794)
    MtDNA haplogroup
    H6a1b

    Ethnic group
    Italian
    Country: United States



    1 members found this post helpful.
    Quote Originally Posted by ihype02 View Post
    ^ Are you sure it's 80%?
    Here is the admixture chart; they seem to have a bit more of the cyan component mostly associated with Iran_N, and of course the Yoruba-like component in red. Though, they are mostly the same.

    Though, I would say the Yemenite Jews look a bit closer to their autosomal component admixture rates. On the PCA they overlap more with BedouinA, Palestinians, and Saudis:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •