Demographic history of South China

Angela

Elite member
Messages
21,823
Reaction score
12,329
Points
113
Ethnic group
Italian
See:
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.11.08.373225v1

"[FONT=&quot]Southern China is the birthplace of rice-cultivating agriculture, different language families, and human migrations that facilitated these cultural diffusions. The fine-scale demographic history in situ, however, remains unclear. To comprehensively cover the genetic diversity in East and Southeast Asia, we generated genome-wide SNP data from 211 present-day Southern Chinese and co-analyzed them with more than 1,200 ancient and modern genomes. We discover that the previously described Southern East Asian or Yangtze River Farmer lineage is monophyletic but not homogeneous, comprising four regionally differentiated sub-ancestries. These ancestries are respectively responsible for the transmission of Austronesian, Kra-Dai, Hmong-Mien, and Austroasiatic languages and their original homelands successively distributed from East to West in Southern China. Multiple phylogenetic analyses support that the earliest living branching among East Asian-related populations is First Americans (~27,700 BP), followed by the pre-LGM differentiation between Northern and Southern East Asians (~23,400 BP) and the pre-Neolithic split between Coastal and Inland Southern East Asians (~16,400 BP). In North China, distinct coastal and inland routes of south-to-north gene flow had established by the Holocene, and further migration and admixture formed the genetic profile of Sinitic speakers by ~4,000 BP. Four subsequent massive migrations finalized the complete genetic structure of present-day Southern Chinese. First, a southward Sinitic migration and the admixture with Kra-Dai speakers formed the Sinitic Cline. Second, a bi-directional admixture between Hmong-Mien and Kra-Dai speakers gave rise to the Hmong-Mien Cline in the interior of South China between ~2,000 and ~1,000 BP. Third, a southwestward migration of Kra-Dai speakers in recent ~2,000 years impacted the genetic profile for the majority of Mainland Southeast Asians. Finally, an admixture between Tibeto-Burman incomers and indigenous Austroasiatic speakers formed the Tibeto-Burman speakers in Southeast Asia by ~2,000 BP.[/FONT]
 
More on the subject: Razib Khan's view on the displacement of Southeast Asia.

https://www.gnxp.com/WordPress/2020...=the-great-southern-displacement-in-east-asia

"The new preprint, Genomic Insights into the Demographic History of Southern Chinese, is somewhat inaccurately titled. It’s really more about the progenitors of the various Southeast Asian language families, whose origins are in South China. Yes, mother southern Han Chinese absorbed local substrate, but that’s been known for a while.
The story here is successive incidents of ‘collapsing structure’ out of the Last Glacial Maximum. The various East Asian populations admixed after diversification 20-40,000 years ago, and there was a later stage of admixture driven by the expansion of the Han out of the north."
"The most interesting finding is an Andaman-like “ghost population” that contributed to the Jomon, and less to other groups. You know where I’m going here: this is clearly the basal East Eurasian group called “Australo-Melanesian” that contributed genes to some Amazonian groups. This group is the one that contributed haplogroup D to Tibetans and Japanese."
 

This thread has been viewed 6256 times.

Back
Top