Vallicanus
Regular Member
- Messages
- 1,188
- Reaction score
- 454
- Points
- 83
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b Z36
Higher percentages of WHG and EEF, confirming that the Eastern thesis is not true.
+1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Higher percentages of WHG and EEF, confirming that the Eastern thesis is not true.
apparently the Etruscans were overwhelming R1b, and to a lesser extent G2a
thanks
where did you get this
since this
paper is not published yet ?
or am i worng ?
Is a Y-dna sample of just NINE between 0-1000CE reliable as against 27 before the Common Era?
From a conference, not published yet.
In fact, they have few samples from the imperial age. There are many more from the Iron Age.
The important part of the paper remains the one on the origins of the Etruscans. The one on the genetic legacy of the Etruscans seems the weakest.
From a conference, not published yet.
In fact, they have few samples from the imperial age. There are many more from the Iron Age.
The important part of the paper remains the one on the origins of the Etruscans. The one on the genetic legacy of the Etruscans seems the weakest.
From a conference, not published yet.
In fact, they have few samples from the imperial age. There are many more from the Iron Age.
The important part of the paper remains the one on the origins of the Etruscans. The one on the genetic legacy of the Etruscans seems the weakest.
Very intriguing, do you know if the VEN samples are from the Iron Age?
The bolded part is important and the Y Dna and mtdna figures therein need to be compared to modern Tuscany and Northern Lazio.
After all to the south, Etruria originally ended at Veii, just north of the Tiber mouth.
Thanks for the information. Do you have any information regarding Y HG J, are they only J2b, as we already know, or are there any J2a's as well?. Grazie mille
Still unclear, it doesn't even seem to match the samples from the Campania study.
Indeed. Considering the changes due to Romanization though. I hope that very soon there will be Etruscan samples from Emilia-Romagna, and samples from the rest of northern Italy, the Raeti, Veneti, Golasecca culture, Ligurians... On how Bologna and surroundings have become Etruscan since early Villanovan I think there is no consensus yet (Settlers from Tuscany or Etruscan since the prehistory?). While the consensus for Campania is that the Etruscan presence in Campania was surely due to Villanovan/Etruscans settlers from northern Latium.
For the upcoming paper on Magna Graecia - Campania. The Villanovan/Etruscan samples are all from Campania here.
No, I don't know, sorry. I think publication should be forthcoming.
I think we can lay to rest the idea that J2b was a founding lineage of the Etruscan=
Maciamo's chart shows 52.5 percent R1b in Tuscany. Combined J1 and J2 is 13.5%.
This is the latest July 2021 chart from a non-academic Italian project.
Berengar I of Italy (850?924) located his headquarters in Monza. A fortified castrum was constructed to resist the incursions of the Hungarians. Under Berengar's reign, Monza enjoyed a certain degree of independence: it had its own system of weights and measures, and could also seize property and mark the deeds with their signatures. Berengar was very generous evident by the donation of numerous works to the Monza Cathedral, including the famous cross, and by giving large benefits to its 32 canons and other churches.
I think we can lay to rest the idea that J2b was a founding lineage of the Etruscan=
Maciamo's chart shows 52.5 percent R1b in Tuscany. Combined J1 and J2 is 13.5%.
This is the latest July 2021 chart from a non-academic Italian project.
thanks
where did you get this
since this
paper is not published yet ?
or am i worng ?
This thread has been viewed 98767 times.