ericrdpilot
Regular Member
- Messages
- 10
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 3
- Location
- Southwest Michigan
- Ethnic group
- US/Dutch
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b1a2
- mtDNA haplogroup
- K
Maybe this has been asked before but here is my question.
Prior to about 6000 years ago, the warrior society and constant violence seemed fairly rare. When the Yamnaya moved thru Western Europe, violence and the warrior clans seem to have increased a great deal. My question is were people that the Yamnaya replaced genetically more passive, and the Yamnaya genetically more aggressive and prone to violence, and has that genetic tendency to violence stuck with us today? Has there ever been any kind of study showing one haplogroup being more prone to violence than another?
Prior to about 6000 years ago, the warrior society and constant violence seemed fairly rare. When the Yamnaya moved thru Western Europe, violence and the warrior clans seem to have increased a great deal. My question is were people that the Yamnaya replaced genetically more passive, and the Yamnaya genetically more aggressive and prone to violence, and has that genetic tendency to violence stuck with us today? Has there ever been any kind of study showing one haplogroup being more prone to violence than another?