Genetic study The origin and legacy of the Etruscans through a 2000-year archeogenomic time transec

Considering that Osco-Umbrians and very likely the Proto-Latins practiced inhumation burial, and i associate their coming to Italy earlier, during Early Bronze Age i think Etruscans are to be associated with Proto-Villanovans who came during Late Bronze Age from somewhere from Alps to Western Carpathians, they were probably a spinoff of one of Middle Danubian Urnfield Cultures and previous to that a variant of Pannonian Encrusted Pottery Culture resisting Hugelgraberkultur invasion, and the ancestors of Etruscans might have been G2a rich.
 
Hawk said:
Considering that Osco-Umbrians and very likely the Proto-Latins practiced inhumation burial, and i associate their coming to Italy earlier, during Early Bronze Age i think Etruscans are to be associated with Proto-Villanovans who came during Late Bronze Age from somewhere from Alps to Western Carpathians, they were probably a spinoff of one of Middle Danubian Urnfield Cultures and previous to that a variant of Pannonian Encrusted Pottery Culture resisting Hugelgraberkultur invasion, and the ancestors of Etruscans might have been G2a rich.
Click to expand...

Nope. As it is known Proto-Latins praticed incineration just as the Proto-Etruscans and the whole northern Italy, inhumation at the beginning is (only) characteristic of speakers of Osco-Umbrian languages (but at least with an initial exception lasted little for the Umbrians where incineration graves have been found in "Fase Terni 1", as well as there are examples of inhumation tombs even in territories where incineration was more widespread).

In addition, the uniparental markers of both Latins and Etruscans do show an affinity to the Bell Beaker primarily (although some Y-DNA may have come with the Proto-Villanovan). The same linguists in dividing the Italic languages think that the speakers of Latino-Faliscan languages arrived earlier than those speaking Osco-Umbrian languages.
 
Uairun said:
Does the scenario of an increase in the "Iranian" bloodline due to the migration of the imperial period not imply that the epicentre of this bloodline will be in Rome and the surrounding area? And will decrease as you go north and south (excluding possibly Sicily, because of the abundance of slaves on the latifundia). Moreover, Lazio was controlled by Byzantium and then by the Pope, and the Germans there should have been even fewer than in the south, and the influence of the Greeks stronger. The latter, by the way, can be seen in the example of Romagna. (parts of the Exarchate of Ravenna)
Distance to:Italian_Romagna
2.12087246Italian_Umbria
3.17271177Italian_Tuscany
3.57134484Italian_Marche
3.78273710Italian_Lazio
4.88089131Italian_Emilia
Click to expand...

Extra CHG is prevalent throughout out much of the Roman empire. Though I do not think 100% of it can be attributed to Imperial era immigrants. A new paper speculates Iran gene-flow has been around since the past 10,000 years, and predates farming in Anatolia.
 
Jovialis said:
Extra CHG is prevalent throughout out much of the Roman empire. Though I do not think 100% of it can be attributed to Imperial era immigrants. A new paper speculates Iran gene-flow has been around since the past 10,000 years, and predates farming in Anatolia.
Click to expand...

vFYmyGU.png


Z0n953B.png
 
^^Some Modern Greeks get about as much or more ABA than South Italians, in my model. I think the source of this, in those respects, ultimately come from the Aegean Islands, since they can be modeled as mostly ABA (plus smaller components of Steppe and Iberomaurusian), with a very good fit. However, that could have arrived to Southern Italy during the Colonial Greek era. While IMO, the Minoan, plus Steppe "package" could have been indicative of Ancient Achaean-like/IA_Balkan-like ancestry.
 
^^It should also be noted that the R1 Protovillanovan can be modeled as about 1/3rd "minoan". To me, this demonstrates that this type of ancestry has been in Italy, before the arrival of Indo-European people. She was found in Abruzzo. I'd wager this ancestry is even more prevalent the further south you go... Sicily BA samples have healthy amounts of it too. Go east from there, to Puglia, Daunians have large amounts of it too. How much did the people before their arrival have?

Frankly, I don't see anything that exotic about C.Italy in the middle ages, as this study proports.
 
Jovialis said:
^^It should also be noted that the R1 Protovillanovan can be modeled as about 1/3rd "minoan". To me, this demonstrates that this type of ancestry has been in Italy, before the arrival of Indo-European people. She was found in Abruzzo. I'd wager this ancestry is even more prevalent the further south you go... Sicily BA samples have healthy amounts of it too. Go east from there, to Puglia, Daunians have large amounts of it too. How much did the people before their arrival have?

Frankly, I don't see anything that exotic about C.Italy in the middle ages, as this study proports.
Click to expand...


R1 Protovillanovan was an ancestor of Osco-Umbrian Picentes.
 
Pax Augusta said:
Nope. As it is known Proto-Latins praticed incineration just as the Proto-Etruscans and the whole northern Italy, inhumation at the beginning is (only) characteristic of speakers of Osco-Umbrian languages (but at least with an initial exception lasted little for the Umbrians where incineration graves have been found in "Fase Terni 1", as well as there are examples of inhumation tombs even in territories where incineration was more widespread).

In addition, the uniparental markers of both Latins and Etruscans do show an affinity to the Bell Beaker primarily (although some Y-DNA may have come with the Proto-Villanovan). The same linguists in dividing the Italic languages think that the speakers of Latino-Faliscan languages arrived earlier than those speaking Osco-Umbrian languages.
Click to expand...

Well, one of these three groups need to have come during Late Bronze Age with Proto-Villanovans:

1. Proto-Etruscans.
2. Proto-Latins.
3. Proto Osco-Umbrians

I have singled out Osco-Umbrians because they practiced inhumation largely something the opposite of Proto-Villanovans. I went with Proto-Etruscans because Rhaetians were right in the Alps, and somehow it fits for them to be these group of people also due to geographicity. They were more North than Latins. But, who knows, you are the expert on Italian archeology.
 
Hawk said:
Considering that Osco-Umbrians and very likely the Proto-Latins practiced inhumation burial, and i associate their coming to Italy earlier, during Early Bronze Age i think Etruscans are to be associated with Proto-Villanovans who came during Late Bronze Age from somewhere from Alps to Western Carpathians, they were probably a spinoff of one of Middle Danubian Urnfield Cultures and previous to that a variant of Pannonian Encrusted Pottery Culture resisting Hugelgraberkultur invasion, and the ancestors of Etruscans might have been G2a rich.
Click to expand...


Inhumation burials may account for around 2-10 % of the several hundreds of graves – mostly cremations – attested at the three burial sites presently known at Frattesina, namely Fondo Zanotto, Narde I and Narde II65. Cremation was also by far the commonest visible funerary rite attested in Iron Age Veneto66 ; the spread of cremation rites coupled with a severe decline in the adoption of inhumation is attested in Veneto since the Recent Bronze Age and reached its climax in the Final Bronze Age67 ; the meaning of this drastic change in funerary practice remains partially obscure, although it might have been related to major changes in the funerary ideology as well as the socio-political and socio-economic arrangement of the region68 ; it must be noted that the 12th century BC has already been identified as a phase of crisis and dramatic change in northern Italy, characterized, among other phenomena, by the collapse of the Terramare settlement system69
 
Salento said:
Many think of Florence as a Medieval or a Renaissance city, but it could have begun as a Roman barracks built by Julius Caesar for his Legionaries.

… Continuity :)
I spent over a year in Tuscany, ... Arezzo, Pisa, but most of it in Florence, alla Simoni when it used to be the headquarters of the Rep. Com. RMTE, near S. M. Novella, a few minutes walk from the Duomo, Ponte Vecchio, the Uffizi (but we pronounce it with two Z).

… though Lecce is called the Florence of the South, we call Firenze the Lecce of the North :grin:
Click to expand...

I prefer the architecture in Lecce!
 
Can anyone download the etruscan samples to see whether the blond hair gene is common among these samples?
 
Mario said:
Can anyone download the etruscan samples to see whether the blond hair gene is common among these samples?
Click to expand...

mydnaportal.com allows you to upload raw data, and it gives you predictions based on SNPs. It works for aDNA, but you have to do it one at a time, and it is very time consuming; there's a lot of Etruscan samples. It is likely that some of them did indeed have blonde hair, or genes for blonde hair. They had steppe admixture in them after all.
 
Thanks very much，well i entered nbci.com page, then inputed the ancient etruscan samples numbers but did not found the download links . It seems that the authors of this paper don't open the raw data? A little confused.
 
Mario said:
Can anyone download the etruscan samples to see whether the blond hair gene is common among these samples?
Click to expand...

How come that of all ancient history it could be of interest how blond they were?

Archaeologically, there are no realistic portraits of Etruscans before the end of the 4th century BC.
 
Jovialis said:
mydnaportal.com allows you to upload raw data, and it gives you predictions based on SNPs. It works for aDNA, but you have to do it one at a time, and it is very time consuming; there's a lot of Etruscan samples. It is likely that some of them did indeed have blonde hair, or genes for blonde hair. They had steppe admixture in them after all.
Click to expand...
Thanks, I have downloaded the etruscan samples, however I found the raw data only includes Mdna. Could this website analysis the color of hair only by Mdna data？
 
Jovialis do you have Medival Tuscany K12b coordinates? I found Imperial and Republican ones in some of your posts but not the medieval. Not sure if I missed them.
 
Here you go:

Code: 
C.Italy_Etruscan:CampigliadeiFoci(Siena_Tuscany)_780-540BCE:CAM001,1.38,0.19,1.2,0,47.62,24.58,0,0,6.88,0,17.87,0.27
C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu:CampigliadeiFoci(Siena_Tuscany)_770-520BCE:CAM002,4.72,0.03,0,1.59,40.47,34.19,0,0,4.64,0,13.94,0.44
C.Italy_Etruscan:CampigliadeiFoci(Siena_Tuscany)_770-540BCE:CAM003,0.93,0.04,0.79,0,49.21,23.83,0,0,7,0.18,16.98,1.04
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN001,0.74,0,1.6,0.73,46.5,23.83,0,0,7.19,0,19.25,0.16
C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu_related:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_427-265BCE:CSN002,0,0.36,0,0,41.12,32.35,0,0,0,0,26.17,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_380-204BCE:CSN003,0.97,0.01,2,0,49.14,21.97,1.05,0,7.95,0.53,15.93,0.45
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN004,1.49,0,2.17,0.71,51.75,19.41,0.13,0,5.2,0,18.21,0.93
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN005,1.48,0,4.65,0,39.23,28.19,0.65,0,6.11,0.54,19.16,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_533-392BCE:CSN006,3.62,0,0,1.53,45.77,24.02,0.29,0,4.9,0,19.6,0.27
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN007,0,0,0,0.5,50.29,20.45,0,0,10.86,0,17.91,0
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN008,4.93,0,0,0.4,43.71,27.95,0,0,4.16,0,18.84,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_427-265BCE:CSN009,2.52,0,2.03,0,39.86,27.95,0,0,2.52,0.43,23.93,0.75
C.Italy_Etruscan_related:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany)_380-204BCE:CSN010,4.43,0.27,3.49,0,40.36,31.59,0,0,5.33,1.81,11.48,1.25
:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN012,7.01,0,10.55,0,41.84,29.45,0,0,0,0,11.15,0
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Casenovole(Grosseto_Tuscany):CSN013,4.87,0,0.54,0,45.93,21.96,0.41,0,5.92,0.25,19.55,0.57
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)_997-1149CE:ETR003,10.36,0,2.55,0,30.58,19.47,0,0,10.98,0,25.66,0.41
:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany):ETR004,17.44,0,0,0,19.59,19.63,0,0,11.7,0,31.64,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)_805-774BCE:ETR005,2,0,0,1.54,45.54,20.52,0.17,0,9.35,1.02,18.73,1.13
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)_772-888CE:ETR006,3.87,1.22,0,0,39.39,15.01,0,0,12.67,0,26.45,1.39
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)775-945CE:ETR007,5.51,0,2.37,1.28,30.11,25.01,0,0,8.81,0,26.92,0
C.Italy_Early.Medieval_undated:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany):ETR010,4.58,0.05,1.08,0.22,37.3,17.15,0.08,0,9.4,0,29.53,0.6
C.Italy_Early.Medieval_undated:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany):ETR012,17.52,1.96,0,0,41.58,12.98,3.45,0.35,5.74,0,16.42,0
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)C899-1016CE:ETR013,6.64,0.06,1.86,0,35.44,14.98,0,0,9.51,0,31.24,0.28
C.Italy_Early.Medieval_ETR014:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)_977-1022CE:ETR014,3.51,0,2.87,0,27.31,14.86,0.51,0,14.53,0,36.4,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:MaglianoinToscana(Grosseto_Tuscany)_790-550BCE:MAG001,0.84,0,0,0,47.05,24.88,0.37,0.08,3.46,0.47,22.84,0.02
C.Italy_Etruscan_MAS001:Marsilianad'Albegna(Grosseto_Tuscany)_350-100BCE:MAS001,7.2,0.84,4.18,0,26.73,30.23,1.6,0.6,6.25,1.12,21.08,0.18
C.Italy_Imperial:Marsilianad'Albegna(Grosseto_Tuscany)_240-380CE:MAS002,6.49,1.52,3.63,0,23.56,7.82,0,0.48,18.33,0.02,38.16,0
C.Italy_Imperial:Marsilianad'Albegna(Grosseto_Tuscany)_400-530CE:MAS003,2.81,0,8.6,1.47,34.71,11.66,0,1.28,11.86,0,26.84,0.76
C.Italy_Etruscan:Marsilianad'Albegna(Grosseto_Tuscany)_804-557BCE:MAS004,1.12,0,0.85,0,44.63,29.23,0,0,1.36,1.35,21.46,0
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:PoggioPelliccia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_772-960CE:POP001,4.72,0.15,0.86,0,35.02,19.76,0,0,8.74,1.36,28.84,0.55
C.Italy_Etruscan:PoggioRenzo(Siena_Tuscany)_794-543BCE:PRZ001,1.55,0.11,0,0,48.41,23.78,0,0,6.08,0.13,19.22,0.71
C.Italy_Etruscan:PoggioRenzo(Siena_Tuscany)_772-436BCE:PRZ002,0,0,2.6,0.54,47.1,27.43,0,0,4.06,1.06,17.2,0
C.Italy_Etruscan_related:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_356-96BCE:TAQ001,2.36,0,4.12,0.57,47.15,23.95,0,0,4.6,0,17.25,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_103BCE-54CE:TAQ002,0,0,1.15,0.26,46.51,23.88,0,0,5.81,0,21.27,1.12
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_729-942CE:TAQ003,5.6,0,2.14,1.3,29.31,17.09,0.1,0.93,11.36,0,31.59,0.58
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_:TAQ004,1.71,0.66,0.95,0.36,48.5,23.89,0,0,5.59,0,17.87,0.48
C.Italy_Etruscan_related:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_346-51BCE:TAQ005,1.39,0.44,5.14,0,46.29,17.75,0.22,0.33,8.86,0.41,18.68,0.49
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_:TAQ006,1.18,0,3.59,0,42.96,25.05,0.15,0,2.83,0,24.24,0
C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_391-207BCE:TAQ007,3.25,0.65,8.19,0,33.36,6.55,0.82,0,13.72,0.07,31.87,1.52
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio):TAQ008,4.27,1.3,0.28,0.84,49.67,21.5,0,0,3.99,0,17.53,0.63
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_899-1021CE:TAQ009,4.13,0.23,2.43,0.82,33.16,19.69,0.14,0,9.54,0,28.81,1.06
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio):TAQ010,0,0,1.32,0.05,48.43,24.81,0.71,0,4.04,0,20.41,0.24
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_895-1016CE:TAQ011,6.51,0.15,1.38,0.03,33.17,19.02,0,1.09,10.21,0,27.5,0.96
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio):TAQ012,3.32,0,1.79,0,51.8,17.96,0.72,0,7.3,0,16.79,0.33
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio):TAQ013,2.83,1.64,1.78,0,46.46,21.33,0,0,6.68,0,19.04,0.23
C.Italy_Etruscan:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_346-51BCE:TAQ015,1.72,0,2.42,0,46.31,21.99,0,0,6.46,0.63,19.66,0.81
C.Italy_Etruscan_undated:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio):TAQ016,2.43,0,1.67,0,46.91,24.12,0.84,0,5.34,0,18.06,0.63
C.Italy_Etruscan_related:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_356-96BCE:TAQ017,4.08,0,1.96,0,48.92,20.11,0,0,5.6,0,19.12,0.21
C.Italy_Etruscan_related:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_346-51BCE:TAQ018,0,0,0.47,0,48.53,20.84,0.43,0,6.5,1.43,20.91,0.89
C.Italy_Etruscan:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_358-98BCE:TAQ019,0.49,0,2.18,0,47.66,24.5,0.17,0,5.48,0.04,19.27,0.21
C.Italy_Imperial:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_89-236CE:TAQ020,9.02,0.66,1.49,0.5,34.13,18.73,0.12,0,7.43,0,27.92,0
C.Italy_Imperial:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_262-424CE:TAQ021,3.74,0,2.51,0,33.22,11.47,2.01,0,12.62,0,34.44,0
C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_1018-1151CE:TAQ022,5.66,0,2.84,0,34.54,19.74,2.22,0,6.34,0,28.11,0.54
C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_396-216BCE:TAQ023,0.11,0,9.86,0,38.6,11.68,0.88,1.34,10.18,0,26.04,1.31
C.Italy_Etruscan:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_356-96BCE:TAQ024,1.55,0.2,4.01,0.27,46.92,21.83,0,0.36,4.57,0,20.29,0
C.Italy_Etruscan_UDC_P:Chiostraccio(Siena_Tuscany)_174-53BCE:UDC_P,0,0,4.31,0,52.14,29.39,0,0,0.89,0,13.22,0.04
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_650-800CE:VEN001,5.14,0,3.87,0.01,28.18,17.6,0,0,11.33,2.38,29.77,1.73
S.Italy_Venosa_VEN002:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_650-800CE:VEN002,2.79,8.01,0,12.59,16.3,9.93,3.89,0.01,6.34,27.43,12.71,0
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_650-763CE:VEN005,6.66,0,4.28,1.53,32.55,10.92,0,0,10.86,0.37,32.83,0
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_650-763CE:VEN006,8.51,0.54,5.29,0.22,27.14,16.32,0,0,9.76,1.99,30.08,0.16
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_660-766CE:VEN008,4.55,6.58,0,0,36.17,16.54,2.72,0,8.77,0,23.04,1.63
S.Italy_Venosa_related:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_660-766CE:VEN009,4.96,0,10.9,0.28,29.02,16.26,0,3.03,6.57,0,28.99,0
S.Italy_Venosa_related:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_670-775CE:VEN010,16.14,0,2.12,1.09,37.1,15.42,0,0.05,13.2,0,14.88,0
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_670-775CE:VEN012,2.86,0,1.41,0.17,24.58,14.71,0,1.75,12.7,5.77,36.03,0.03
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_670-775CE:VEN013,7.7,0,5.12,0,28.43,14.81,0,0,10.94,1.22,30.32,1.45
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_670-775CE:VEN014,12.68,0,5.83,0,33.04,0,0,0.24,17.71,1.35,28.74,0.42
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_670-775CE:VEN015,7.16,0,3.85,0.73,28.62,13.96,0.39,0,13.73,0,30.9,0.64
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_672-800CE:VEN016,6.56,0,6.02,0,25.63,16.98,0,0,13.65,0.44,30.73,0
S.Italy_Venosa_related:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_672-800CE:VEN017,1.13,1.55,0,0.12,32.91,17.47,3.75,0,12.37,3.07,27.62,0
S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_672-800CE:VEN018,9.33,0,3.69,0,27.33,17.18,0,0,19.59,0,20.74,2.14
S.Italy_Venosa_related:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_672-800CE:VEN021,8.65,0,0.51,3.3,17.54,14.06,0,2.43,21.68,1.47,30.37,0
S.Italy_Venosa_related:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_672-800CE:VEN022,7.04,0,0,5.28,15.13,25.83,0,0.13,20.82,0,25.77,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_750-406BCE:VET001,1.52,0,2.24,1.15,42.15,23.87,0,1.18,6.3,0,21.57,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_790-550BCE:VET002,0.77,1.24,2.59,0,48.74,18.77,0,0,7.8,0.08,20.03,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_800-590BCE:VET003_4,1.33,0,2.66,0,47.08,21.2,0.25,0.26,7.04,0.15,20.03,0
C.Italy_Etruscan.Ceu:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_360-200BCE:VET005,7.72,0.55,0,0,43.13,37.83,0,1.41,1.61,0,7.74,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_806-599BCE:VET007,0,0,2.57,0.68,51.02,20.09,0.22,0,6.74,0.42,17.63,0.63
C.Italy_Etruscan.Afr:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_372-204BCE:VET008,0.41,0,8.27,0,38.29,9.06,0,1.75,12.78,0.04,28.42,0.99
C.Italy_Etruscan:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_788-545BCE:VET010,0,0,4.61,0.76,48.22,21.92,0.27,0,3.53,0,20.12,0.57
:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_750-413BCE:VET011,0,0,6.57,0,51.11,17.17,0,2.72,3.32,0,19.1,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Vetulonia(Grosseto_Tuscany)_790-550BCE:VEU001,0,0,1.86,2.69,45.76,22.07,0,0.83,3.79,0,23.01,0
C.Italy_Etruscan:Volterra(Pisa_Tuscany)_200-60BCE:VOL001,0.94,0,1.77,0,44.5,24.66,0.61,0.03,5.61,0,21.4,0.48
 
Thanks Jovialis :)

… top 5:

Distance to:Salento
3.65926222C.Italy_Early.Medieval:Tarquinia(Viterbo_Lazio)_729-942CE:TAQ003
4.74684105C.Italy_Early.Medieval_ETR014:Chiusi(Siena_Tuscany)_977-1022CE:ETR014
5.19440083S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_670-775CE:VEN015
5.52571262S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_672-800CE:VEN016
5.76488508S.Italy_Venosa:Venosa(Potenza_Basilicata)_650-800CE:VEN001
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

This thread has been viewed 130771 times.

Back
Top