Royal Dynasty of Xiongu belonged R1a

kmak

Regular Member
Messages
267
Reaction score
23
Points
18
According this Facebook page of genetics Royal Dynasty of Xiongnu belonged R1a.

''In short, this Chanyu who lived 2000 years ago was a native north/northeast Asian who maybe spoke a Turkic/proto-Turkic language, while his paternal ancestor came from western world. So, who exactly is this Chanyu? Because there's no evidence in writing form from his tomb, we can give several guesses according to records which were kept very well in Chinese history books:

1) Hugulu[狐姑鹿], 96—85 BC




2) Huyandi[壺衍鞮], 85-68 BC




3) Huhanye[呼韓邪], 58-31 BC, the first husband of Wangzhaojun[王昭君]




4) Fuzhuleiruodi[復株累若鞮], 31-20 BC, the second husband of Wangzhaojun[王昭君]




5) Wuzhuliuruodi[烏株留若鞮], 8 BC-13 AD




6) Huduershidaogaoruodi[呼都而尸道臯若鞮], 18-46 AD




Again, and again, thanks to Molecular anthropology and ancient DNA, myths in history become clear to us. Crystal clear? Not yet, but we've already made some very promising progress. In the next few years, more and more ancient samples in China will be analyzed in WGS, including areas like Xinjiang, along with increasing popularity of genetic tests. We have every reason to believe that we can see through the interaction between eastern and western world.



This post is translated from our Chinese website at Wechat Public Group



XiongNu was defeated for good by East Han dynasty around 100 AD. Part of them stayed there and later were assimilated by other North Asian people like Xianbei. Some of them were culturally and ethically assimilated into Chinese people. For those who migrated to west, what is their story? Let’s find out in our next post.''





Source:

https://m.facebook.com/nt/screen/?p...889}&path=/notes/note/&refsrc=deprecated&_rdr
 
This is very interesting. It's an R1a ruling a Mongol confederation.

First, bacause there is R1a penetration into the Central Asian Republics that belonged to the Soviet Union, but not many in Mongolia.

And second, because this empire persisted a few kilometers North of Beijing during most of the Han dinasty.

That clearly gives a blow to the ethnic chauvinists that believe that their civilization happens in a vaccum, without any foreign influence. As if someone was to argue that chariots were not imported from Steppe peoples, rather reinvented.
An stupidity like that.

This likely suggest that IndoEuropeans or Turkics, or both left their mark over the millenia, primarily connecting them to the innovations in the Middle East, Caucasus, horse riding, bronze swords, wagons...
 
This is very interesting. It's an R1a ruling a Mongol confederation.

First, bacause there is R1a penetration into the Central Asian Republics that belonged to the Soviet Union, but not many in Mongolia.

And second, because this empire persisted a few kilometers North of Beijing during most of the Han dinasty.

That clearly gives a blow to the ethnic chauvinists that believe that their civilization happens in a vaccum, without any foreign influence. As if someone was to argue that chariots were not imported from Steppe peoples, rather reinvented.
An stupidity like that.

This likely suggest that IndoEuropeans or Turkics, or both left their mark over the millenia, primarily connecting them to the innovations in the Middle East, Caucasus, horse riding, bronze swords, wagons...

Turkic ethnogenesis was of mixed origin. Proto-Turkic have R1, N, C, Q and J Y-DNA almost all. It seems that Proto-Altaic and its sister languages (Proto-Uralic and other ceased exist language groups) invented by N peoples. But Turkic peoples are bearers almost all Y-DNA.

If historical informations and claims are true. It can be said that Xiongnu Chanyus, Hunnic Khagans, Gokturks Khagans, Khazar Khagans, Hungarian Kings, Karluk Yabghus are bearer of R1a.

Most of Turkic, Iranian, Indian, Greeks, Arabs, Berbers, and other ruling dynasties haplogroups do not know.
 
Last edited:
I confirm this is true.
 

This thread has been viewed 2826 times.

Back
Top