G25 Illustrative DNA vs Genoplot G25 coordinates

[dances_with_weasels]

Hello,

I got my g25 coordinates from Illustrative DNA some time ago. Recently I played around a bit with Genoplot and realized that simulated g25 coordinates that Genoplot gives you differ quite a bit from those I received from Illustrative DNA, although in theory they should match or be very similar. What gives? Is Genoplot just really bad at making those coordinates? Anyone have any similar experiences?

 

[badeshi]

hi, I have been playing with the simulated plots and find big difference if I use k13 or harrappa world as base.... did you find a answer?

 

[eDawn]

Illustrative DNA is much better for me, the coordinates made sense. Genoplot was not. I think it has to do with what admixture calculator was used.

 

[badeshi]

Illustrative DNA is much better for me, the coordinates made sense. Genoplot was not. I think it has to do with what admixture calculator was used.

I tried with Harappaword k16 (i think) and k13 and got quite different results! I was thinking of averaging them together but the numbers are quite different. I suppose I dont actually understand what the G25 coordinates are related to so it is difficult to edit data...

I will prob pony up and pay for g25 at some point I guess...

 

[AnthrogenicaMember]

Simulated G25 coordinates are slightly lower quality than real ones. On Vahaduo I get more nonsensical trace ethnicities with the simulated ones, but it's not a huge difference.

I used "Eurogenes K36 to Global G25 Converter (horizontal version)"