Eupedia Forums
Site NavigationEupedia Top > Eupedia Forum & Japan Forum
Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Gauls: variations mobility

  1. #1
    Elite member
    Join Date

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France

    1 members found this post helpful.

    Gauls: variations mobility

    a new survey:
    Journal Pre-proof
    Origin and mobility of Iron Age Gaulish groups in present-day France revealed
    through archaeogenomics
    Fischer Claire-Elise, Pemonge Marie-Hélène, Ducoussau Isaure, Arzelier Ana,
    Rivollat Maïté, Santos Frederic, Barrand Emam Hélène, Bertaud Alexandre, Beylier
    Alexandre, Ciesielski Elsa, Dedet Bernard, Desenne Sophie, Duday Henri, Chenal
    Fanny, Gailledrat Eric, Goepfert Sébastien, Gorgé Olivier, Gorgues Alexis, Kuhnle
    Gertrud, Lambach François, Lefort Anthony, Mauduit Amandine, Maziere Florent,
    Oudry Sophie, Paresys Cécile, Pinard Estelle, Plouin Suzanne, Richard Isabelle,
    Roth-Zehner Muriel, Roure Réjane, Thevenet Corinne, Thomas Yohann, Rottier
    Stéphane, Deguilloux Marie-France, Pruvost Mélanie

  2. #2
    Elite member
    Join Date

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France

    Origin and mobility of Iron Age Gaulish groups in present-day France revealed through1
    Fischer Claire-Elise*1,2, Pemonge Marie-Hélène2, Ducoussau Isaure2, Arzelier Ana2, Rivollat5
    Alexandre7,8, Ciesielski Elsa8, Dedet Bernard8,Desenne Sophie9,10,Duday Henri2, Chenal7
    Fanny5,9, Gailledrat Eric8, Goepfert Sébastien4,5, Gorgé Olivier11, GorguesAlexis6, Kuhnle8
    Gertrud12, Lambach François2, Lefort Anthony9, Mauduit Amandine4, Maziere Florent8,9,9
    Oudry Sophie9,13, Paresys Cécile9,14, Pinard Estelle9,10, Plouin Suzanne5, Richard Isabelle9,14,10
    Roth-Zehner Muriel5,15, Roure Réjane8, Thevenet Corinne9,10,Thomas Yohann5,9, Rottier11
    Stéphane2, Deguilloux Marie-France*2,16and Pruvost Mélanie*2,16,+
    The Iron Age period occupies an important place in French history,as the Gaulsare17
    regularly presented as the direct ancestors of the extant French population. Wedocumented18
    herethe genomic diversity ofIron Agecommunities originating from six French regions. The19
    49acquired genomes permitted us to highlightan absence ofdiscontinuity between Bronze20
    Age and Iron Age groups in France, lending support to a cultural transition linked to21
    progressive local economic changes rather than to a massive influx of allochthone groups.22
    Genomic analyses revealed strong genetic homogeneity amongthe regional groups associated23
    with distinct archaeological cultures. This genomic homogenisation appearsto belinked to24
    +Lead contact
    *Correspondingauthors:claire-[email protected];marie-[email protected];
    [email protected]
    1present address: Department of Archaeology, University of York, King’s Manor Exhibition Square, York,
    YO1 7EP, UK
    2UMR 5199 PACEA, CNRS, Université de Bordeaux, 33615 Pessac, France
    3Department of Archaeogenetics, Max Planck Institue forEvolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6,
    04103 Leipzig, Germany
    4ANTEA-Archéologie, Habsheim, France
    5UMR7044Archimède,CNRS UniversitédeStrasbourg etUniversitédeHaute-Alsace,Strasbourg et
    Mulhouse, France
    6UMR-5607 Ausonius, Université Bordeaux Montaigne, Maison de l’Archéologie, 8 Esplanade des Antilles
    33607 Pessac, France
    7Service Archéologie Sète agglopôle mediterranée, 34110, Frontignan, France
    8UMR 5140-ASM, Université Paul Valéry Montpellier 3, CNRS, Ministère de la Culture, Inrap, F34000
    Montpellier, France
    9INRAP, Institut National de Recherche Archéologiques Préventives, 75685 Paris cedex14, France
    10UMR 8215 Trajectoires, CNRS, Université Paris 1 Pantheon Sorbonne, 92023 Nanterre, France
    11Institut de Recherche Biomédicaledes Armées, Place Général Valérie André, 91220 Brétigny-sur-Orge,
    12Landesamt für Denkmalpflege im Regierungspräsidium Stuttgart Referat 84.2Operative Archäologie
    Dienstsitz Freiburg Günterstalstraße 67, 79100 Freiburg i. Br.
    13UMR-7268 ADES, CNRS, Université Aix-Marseille, EFS, 13015 Marseille, France
    14UMR 7264 CEPAM, CNRS Université Nice Sophia Antipolis, 06357 Nice cedex4, France
    15Archéologie Alsace, 11 rue Champollion 67600 Sélestat, France
    16These authors contributed equally to this work

    individuals’mobility between regions as well as gene flow with neighbouring groups from25
    England and Spain.Thus, the resultsgloballysupport a common genomic legacy for theIron26
    Agepopulationof modern-day Francethat could be linked to recurrent gene flow between27
    culturally differentiated communities.28
    communities are regularly presented to the general public as the direct ancestors of French32
    populations. This major interest has led to an impressive number of archaeological studies33
    describing Iron Age communities through their material culture andfunerary practices and34
    questioning their cultural origins and affinities. Despitethis interest, questions concerning the35
    cultural and biological processes underlyingthe emergence and expansion ofIron Age36
    cultures remainintenselydebated. Thus, the transition between the Bronze Age(BA)and the37
    Iron Age(IA)wasfirst linked to the rapidshiftfrom bronze to iron technologies between38
    Hallstatt B3 and Hallstatt C (approximately800 BC).However, this clear cut-offdoes not39
    appear toreflect the regional archaeological realitythat there was agradualtransition to the40
    transformations associated with the transition span over two centuriesencompassingthe late42
    Bronze Age and the first phase of the Iron Age and appear to have followed different rhythms43
    that varied byregion(Verger, 2015). Debates also concern the modes of emergence of the44
    Late Iron Age cultureLa Tène, associated with groups generallyreferred to as‘Celts’ and45
    spread over a large part of Europe, spanning from Bohemia to the Atlantic(Roure, 2020).46
    Thus, some authors propose an advent of this cultural entity in Central Europe and Bohemia47
    before its expansion through the migration of groupsbringing cultural developments from the48
    northern Alpine area to the rest of Europe (Kruta, 2000; Brun, 2017).Otherauthors propose a49
    multiregionalorigin of theLa Tèneculture through the evolution of a mosaic of cultural50
    complexes ('multipolar genesisin networks'; Milcent, 2006) connected by common markers51
    such as art without implying major migration.According to this view,the‘Celts’wouldbe52
    defined as a multitude of related people with different cultural practices(Lejars and Gruel,53
    The great amount of archaeological data available for Iron Age groups from the55
    French territory strikingly contrasts with the near absence of genomic data for the human56
    groups concerned. In the archaeology of death, as well as in the study of ancient humangroup57
    dynamics, palaeogenetic analyses have led to considerable advances. From the Palaeolithic to58
    complementary to the archaeological evidence to reconstruct the dynamics of the groups at60
    the Europeanmacroregionalscale (seeLiuet al., 2021 for a recent review), as well as61
    discussions onthe social functioning of communities at the local scale (documenting,for62
    considerable increase in palaeogenomic analyses over the last decade,someterritories or64
    periods remain poorly documented. In that respect,theFrench territory remainedneglected in65
    palaeogenomic studies in Europe until the very recent publication of three studies targeting66
    this key crossroad region in western Europe(Brunelet al., 2020; Rivollatet al., 2020;67
    Seguin-Orlandoet al.,2021). Nevertheless, genetic and genomic data forIAperiod from68
    French territory remain scarce,with mitochondrial data for 91 individuals and low-coverage69
    genomes for 19 individuals(Fischeret al., 2018, 2019; Brunelet al., 2020).To date, the70
    periods, can be extended to the European scale, with a total of44 mitochondrial sequences72
    from Germany, Spain and Italy(Knipperet al., 2014,Núñezet al., 2016,Serventiet al.,73
    2018)and a total of 27 genomic data points from England(Martinianoet al., 2016; Schiffels74
    et al., 2016), Bulgaria(Mathiesonet al., 2018), Croatia(Mathiesonet al., 2018), Spain75
    (Olaldeet al., 2019), Hungary(Gambaet al., 2014), Montenegro(Allentoftet al., 2015),76
    Estonia(Saaget al., 2019)and Germany(Furtwängleret al., 2020).77
    representative palaeogenomic data for French Iron Age groups and their comparison with79
    archaeological data can allowto directly characterise the biological processes potentially80
    involved in the cultural transformations documented betweentheBronze Age and Iron Age81
    orbetween the Early and the LateIron Age periods. Furthermore, compellinggenomic data82
    for these ancient communitiesprovidethe only way to test for correlation betweenthe83
    cultural and biological diversitiesof groupsand question modes of exchanges between84
    populations. Finally, genomic data obtained at the local scale can provide major insightsinto85
    the social organisation of communities. For older periods, whethertheNeolithic or Bronze86
    Age, palaeogenomic studies have revealed recurrent patrilocal residence rules, patrilineal87
    filiation systems or differences in social level(see,for example,Lacanet al., 2011; Mittniket88
    al., 2019). For the Iron Age, the indirect testimonies left by Greeks and Romans (suchasDe89
    Bello Gallicofrom Julius Caesar, even if they must be considered with caution) mentioned a90
    very hierarchical society characterised by a patrilineal system of filiation. Thus, obtaining91
    genomic data for the Iron Age communitiesrepresentsa unique opportunity to compare92
    biological, archaeological and textual data.93
    The outstanding questionspresentedabove and the great potential of the combination94
    of archaeological, textual and genomic datain an attempt toresolvethem motivated us to95
    better document the genomic diversity of the Gaulish populations. For this purpose, we96
    targeted 145individualsfrom 27 sitesspread over the extant French territory and distributed97
    throughout theIAperiod to optimise our chanceof documentingthe gene pool of a98
    representative set of French Iron Age individuals. Thewidechronological distribution of the99
    dataset permitted us to addressquestions of origin and evolution of the groups, whereas the100
    wide geographical distribution of the samplesallowedus to test forinterregionalgene flow.101
    Notably, some archaeological evidence highlighted particularexchangenetworks with the102
    groups fromthesurrounding areas, such as the example of the necropolis of Urville-103
    Nacqueville,sharing clear archaeological features (roundhouses, Durotrigian burials,etc.)104
    with contemporaneous groups from Britain(Lefortet al., 2015).Finally, wealso targeted105
    sites associated with different funerary practices to better understand the biological identity106
    and potential selection of the individuals buried.

  3. #3
    Elite member
    Join Date

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France

    The Iron Age genomic dataset from France111
    A total of 145individuals were targeted for palaeogenomic analyses(TableS1). DNA113
    was extracted, andDNA libraries were built with a partial uracil-DNA glycosylase treatment,114
    allowing for the assessment ofpostmortemdeamination patterns (2% to 29%) expected for115
    ancient DNA data. Initial screening via shotgun sequencing of 1 to 2 million reads was used116
    to select libraries with an amount of endogenous DNA above 15%, leading to the exclusion117
    of 92individuals. For the remaining individualswhopassed these quality criteria, we118
    sequenced the libraries to an average depth of 0.178X(Table S2). Wefound overall119
    negligiblelevel ofcontaminationin our datasetby testing for heterozygosity of polymorphic120
    sites on the X chromosome in males (TableS3). The dataset resulting from these successive121Journal Pre-proof
    quality selections encompasses low-coverage genomes for 49 individuals originating from 27122
    sites,datingfrom the BronzeAge (N= 2) and the Iron Age periods (N=47).We compiled123
    theIAdata with 18 low-coverage genomes already published forIAgroups from France124
    (Brunelet al., 2020),leading to a total of 65 low-coverage genomes distributed in 6125
    geographical areas: Alsace (N=20), Champagne (N=5), Normandy (N=3), North (N=126
    10), South (N=18) and ParisBasin (N=9)(see Figure1A,STAR Methods andTables S1127
    andS3). TheIAdataset isunbalanced in terms of the chronological distribution of the128
    individuals, with 11 individuals dated to the Early Iron Age and 54 dated to the Late Iron Age129
    period(Figure1B). This can be partly explained by the funerary treatment and the use of130
    cremation (see,for example,Dedet, 2004 forsouthernFrance).The fewhumansremains131
    (fromsouthern ornorth-westernFrance) available for genomic analyses represent deceased132
    who escaped cremation and benefited fromnon-ordinaryfunerary practices.Therefore, the133
    corpus available for genomic analysismaynotberepresentative of the entire population134
    living at the time.For instance, forsouthernFrance, genetically analysedindividuals135
    correspond to severed heads (seeSTAR Methods. site of Le Cailar) or toneonatesburied in136
    settlements(seeSTAR Methods. site Le Plan de la Tour). The dataset is also unbalanced in137
    termsof regional representativeness,with the Normandy region providing the lowest number138
    of genomes due to the low DNA conservation in the coastal Urville-Nacqueville necropolis139
    targeted(Table S1). Finally, among the 65 individuals, if 33weremales and 32werefemales,140
    the sex ratio within each regionwasunbalanced, with notably more females in Alsace and141
    more males in the South (Table S2). Withthis framein mind, we analysed our data with142
    published ancientindividuals(n = 5225)genotyped on the 1240k panel(Mathiesonet al.,143
    2015)as well withmodern (n = 6461) individuals from a panel of modern-day worldwide144
    populations genotyped on the Affymetrix Human Origins (HO) panel.From thepresent145
    study’sdataset,65individuals with more than 20,000 SNPs on the 1240k panel were used for146
    the downstream genome-wide analyses (see STAR Methods andTable S2).Wefound no147
    first-degree relatives among IA individuals from present-day France allowing us to keep the148
    full datasetfordownstream analyses (see STAR Methods, Table S3and Figure S4).149
    We first explored our data qualitatively usingprincipal component analysis (PCA)by151
    projecting the ancient genomes onto the genetic variation ofanHO set of west Eurasians152
    (Figure 1C andS1). French IA individuals fall within the genomic variability ofthemodern-153
    dayFrenchpopulation. IA samples from Spain and Great Britain also fall within modern-day154
    populations from the same region, highlighting a certain degree of continuity from the Iron155
    Age to modern-day populations inwesternEurope, confirming previous results based on156
    mitochondrial DNA(Fischeret al., 2018). The PCA alsoshowsa clinal distribution of our IA157
    French samples according to their latitudinal position:the northernsamples arecloser to the158
    extantGreatBritain population,and thesouthern samples are closerto the Spanishpopulation159
    (FigureS1). These observations are fully consistent with genomic studies conducted on160
    modern Europeans andhighlightageographically and genomicintermediate positionof the161
    al., 2008).163
    To test further the genomic variability of thenewIA genomes, wegrouped the166
    individuals among differentchrono-culturalgroups,i.e.,according to their region of origin167
    and, when possible, to theirdating(Earlyvs.Late Iron Age):EIA_Alsace (from 800 BC to168
    450 BC),LIA_Alsace (from 450 BC to 50 BC), IA_Champagne, IA_Normandy, IA_North,169
    IA_Paris_Basin and IA_South. We then carriedoutaqpWaveanalysis iterated over all170
    individuals in the pool, testing for significant evidence of heterogeneity relative to the171

    remaining chrono-cultural group (seeSTAR Methods and Figure 2). Individuals were172
    considered genomic outliersfrom the chronological-cultural group from which they originate173
    when theqpWavep value was <0.05(Fernandeset al., 2020). This resulted in the174
    identification of six individuals as outliers: BES1248, PECH3 and PEY163 stand as outliers175
    LIA_Alsacegroup and GDF1341 from theIA_Paris_Basin group. The analyses at the177
    regional level were consequently conducted separately on these individuals and their chrono-178
    cultural groups. Theoutlier status of these special individuals will be further discussed.179

  4. #4
    Advisor Angela's Avatar
    Join Date

    Ethnic group
    Country: USA - New York

    1 members found this post helpful.
    I just this minute finished reading it. There are so many caveats, starting with low coverage genomes and the lack of balance in terms of numbers between the early and late Iron Age that I have some hesitancy in accepting it.

    "The Iron Age period occupies an important place in French history, as the Gauls are regularly presented as the direct ancestors of the extant French population. We documented here the genomic diversity of Iron Age communities originating from six French regions. The 49 acquired genomes permitted us to highlight an absence of discontinuity between Bronze Age and Iron Age groups in France, lending support to a cultural transition linked to progressive local economic changes rather than to a massive influx of allochthone groups. Genomic analyses revealed strong genetic homogeneity among the regional groups associated with distinct archaeological cultures. This genomic homogenisation appears to be linked to individuals’ mobility between regions as well as gene flow with neighbouring groups from England and Spain. Thus, the results globally support a common genomic legacy for the Iron Age population of modern-day France that could be linked to recurrent gene flow between culturally differentiated communities."

    In my case, thanks to Lazaridis for the heads up.

    Non si fa il proprio dovere perchè qualcuno ci dica grazie, lo si fa per principio, per se stessi, per la propria dignità. Oriana Fallaci

  5. #5
    Elite member
    Join Date

    Y-DNA haplogroup
    R1b - L21/S145*
    MtDNA haplogroup

    Ethnic group
    more celtic
    Country: France

    1 members found this post helpful.
    Yes, too small samples and personally I'm not sure of the close cultural assignation of the southern France pop's of the time. "Gaul" in some way, but "Celt"? What seems sure independently of this survey is that internal moves occurred in Gaul during Iron and modified the most western parts of the territory. THis survey seems looking at things from far and high.

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 24
    Last Post: 13-06-20, 20:25
  2. France gauls
    By tjlowery87 in forum Iron Age & Antiquity
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-01-19, 21:44
  3. Gauls and Britain
    By tjlowery87 in forum DNA Testing & General Genetics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-12-17, 06:11
  4. Is R1b-L21 associated with the Gauls?
    By r1bl21guy in forum R1b
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 28-05-17, 19:00
  5. Gauls
    By GrecoItalicIllyrian in forum European Culture & History
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 30-08-13, 20:25

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts