Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
View attachment 13316
calculated with G25
The results are "strange" because I used the distance model, not the ultimate component (multi) model. And yes you are right, it is strange because in the multi model English reach 15.4% WHG, but Finns only 10.6%. However in the distance model Finns reach 42.9% WHG and English only 2.0%. So you can consider this map rather a genetic concentration map based on common shared alleles within a gene pool. Finns turn out stronger in this matter, which makes it more plausible since strengthness of common shared alleles tell us more about true ancestry (primary priority) then admixed ancestry like in England (secondary priority).Strange map. Do model this with EEF? EEF probably eat up some of the affinities of WHG in Western Europeans. Brits usually have 14-16% WHG ancestry
I have to disappoint you, but this is the truth (as you can see in the blue G25 distance lists). G25 is the most accurate tool, and perhaps will always be.Very innacurate.
These maps were calculated with the same tool btw: 3 Bell Beaker ancestries (eupedia.com)Very innacurate.
How does this exactly work???
What about the WHG ancestry in every European population???
This thread has been viewed 3646 times.