I can't put the PDF, but I was reading a paper from 10 years ago that for some reason we have been ignoring.
It's Klysov, Rozhanski et al.2012.
The paper in question says that Y-Chromosome haplogroups A&B don't seem to be closely related to the rest.
In contrast to the rest of them, the markers that define A,B are not present in any other haplo downstream of CT.
They're divergent from the rest.
So, I ask the question, do we come from SE Asia, Bangladesh, India, S.China... or Australia/Sahul???
Because there's this other paper from 2020 that says that haplogroup F comes from there(SE. Asia).
And makes sense, since F is found in the lower castes of S.India, C in Oceania...
Also Aboriginals and Papuans already have mitochondrial haplogroups N, even R. They even preserve the dark skin phenotype that appeared 2Ma years ago and they have kept traditional ways of living(hunting and gathering).
And most importantly, other haplogroups, are related to C, unlike A&B, they have genetic markers that are also in C.
It's Klysov, Rozhanski et al.2012.
The paper in question says that Y-Chromosome haplogroups A&B don't seem to be closely related to the rest.
In contrast to the rest of them, the markers that define A,B are not present in any other haplo downstream of CT.
They're divergent from the rest.
So, I ask the question, do we come from SE Asia, Bangladesh, India, S.China... or Australia/Sahul???
Because there's this other paper from 2020 that says that haplogroup F comes from there(SE. Asia).
And makes sense, since F is found in the lower castes of S.India, C in Oceania...
Also Aboriginals and Papuans already have mitochondrial haplogroups N, even R. They even preserve the dark skin phenotype that appeared 2Ma years ago and they have kept traditional ways of living(hunting and gathering).
And most importantly, other haplogroups, are related to C, unlike A&B, they have genetic markers that are also in C.
Last edited: