Forum | Europe Travel Guide | Ecology | Facts & Trivia | Genetics | History | Linguistics |
Austria | France | Germany | Ireland | Italy | Portugal | Spain | Switzerland |
![]() |
People said on another forum that I am atlatomed+dinarid or atlantid+dinarid. Is that correct?
Enviado de meu Pixel 5 usando o Tapatalk
Now they said dinaro-med.
Enviado de meu Pixel 5 usando o Tapatalk
You have nothing visible of 'dinaric' type, concerning skull and face, IMO (details left aside I could have passed over).
I don't know how some people may edit so surprising statements on some fora.
Do I look more italian, iberian, southern french or another ethnicity?
Enviado de meu Pixel 5 usando o Tapatalk
Another one said that I am Bell Beaker phenotype.
Enviado de meu Pixel 5 usando o Tapatalk
I can only say your are dominantly 'mediter' - the 'nordic' part I "saw" first is rather a mistake of mine, or is very light. But 'mediter' is a vague term. You are rather long faced nad show as I said before something 'capelloid' (from one of the Combe-Capelle men in Dordogne, a type dated arounf 9000BC if I remember well, with opposite traits compared to typical 'croma'. That said, don't believe you have a pure dominant heritage of 'capelloid' type!!! This type left just a bit more traces (partly gracilized) on roughly 'mediter' types of Atlantic shores. ATW, your skull and face lines are far from classical 'mediter' types, even far from the Mugem types of the transition Meso-Neolithic in Portugal.
Your eyelids shape could partly be an heritage of this type, but it's intuition based on modern people because I never heard of conserved eyelids on skeletons (LOL)! So it's just bet. Sorry for this still unsatisfying analysis.
I maintain, for look and place, that you look more Iberic than Italian to me, what of course doesn't say you could not pass in Italy...
Have a good day.