I wouldn't have written the post in that manner had I known it was your expression. The video left a bad taste in my mouth as concerns the expressions used by the so called scientist. My apologies.
However, I do think it's important to define one's terms. IF the "heaviest" steppe admixture is 20%, the Mycenaeans had very minor steppe, imo. They were NOT, as "he who shall not be named" claimed a week before the first paper came out, Corded Ware people dropped into Greece!
The same applies, for instance, to the Latins and Etruscans. They were EEF heavy peoples, with only about 25% steppe, which is about what I have, fwiw. The Etruscans, for example, were not recent arrivals from Anatolia in the first millennium B.C. but they were also not Northern European like.
BTW, have the people at anthrogenica apologized yet for being abysmally wrong about the Etruscans?
I'm afraid they should prepare for another upset. It did seem to me too that Reich said something which could be interpreted to mean that "eastern" ancestry appeared in Italy in the Bronze Age, which I've been claiming for more than 10 years and which they've been denying for that long if not more.