Did you get all these "information" from Turkey's education system?
If US controls Iraq, why is Iran pumping oil in Iraq? Why are Iran's troops fighting ISIS in Iraq?
Read the following text at
wiki Iraq–United_Kingdom_relations to have some information about the involvement of the UK in Iraq.
The history of British–Iraqi relations date back to the creation of Iraq in 1920, when it was founded by Great Britain; by establishing separate provinces from Mosul to Basra.
And then read the following links
wiki British_America and
historyworld wrldhis PlainTextHistories to have some basic information about the connections of the British and the US.
You will see that the country Iraq was founded by England after the 1st World War(1914-1918) and that the UK is the founder of the US colonies. After 1918, there has not been a single war of independence in Iraq, and without a war of independence the control of the Iraq country will not be lost, and it means that UK is still under control of this country, but after the 2nd WW uses their puppet brother state US, to gain control over the country. But it is a fact that the army of the UK and the US are so weak, they do not succeed in managing the country called Iraq, therefore they are forced to invade this country(2003) to keep the control of it, but still they fail. Only thing the US is doing, is comitting a genocide of almost 2 million Muslims in Iraq between 2003-2015. The UK and US has not brought freedom in Iraq, instead made Iraq a living hell, and will not bring freedom to my Kurdish brothers!
And Kurt is also a german name, so by your linguistic connections, all Kurts are Kurds.
No it is not Kurt, but Kürt, the exact same linguistic word that is used for the modern Kurdish population. "Kurt" also means "wolf" in Turkish, but "Kürt" does refer to an ethnic group. So, i advice you to make some research before commenting.
Read the following page:
wiki Magyar_tribes
According to András Róna-Tas the locality in which the Hungarians, the Manicha-Er group, emerged was between the Volga river and the Ural Mountains. Between the 8th and 5th centuries BC, the Magyars embarked upon their independent existence and the early period of the proto Hungarian language began.
Around 830, the seven related tribes (Jenő, Kér, Keszi, Kürt-Gyarmat, Megyer, Nyék and Tarján) formed a confederation in Etelköz, called "Hétmagyar" (ie, "The Seven Magyars"). Their leaders, the Seven chieftains of the Magyars, besides Álmos included Előd, Ond, Kond, Tas, Huba and Töhötöm, took a blood oath, swearing eternal loyalty to Álmos. Presumably, the Magyar tribes consisted of 108 clans.
The confederation of the tribes was probably led by two high princes: the kende (their spiritual ruler) and the gyula (their military leader). The high princes were either elected by the leaders of the tribes or appointed by the Khagan of the Khazars who had been exerting influence over the Magyars. Around 862 the seven tribes separated from the Khazars.
Before 881 three Turkic tribes rebelled against the rule of the Khagan of the Khazars, but they were suppressed. After their defeat they left the Khazar Empire and joined voluntarily to the confederation Hétmagyar. The three tribes was organised into one tribe, called Kabar, and later they played the role of vanguard and rear guard during the joint military actions of the confederation. With the joining of the three tribes to the previous seven ones, they became ten, which made them On-ogur (Ten Arrows), one of the possible origins for the name Hungarian.
How can you explain this, if linguistically Kurds are descendants of Indo-Europeans, Turks are not.
Linguistically, we must look at the language of Kurds, is there one common Kurdish language? No, Zazaki and Kurmanci are complete different languages and are not dialects of each other. A Zaza cannot understand what a Kurmanci says. And analyzing the word "Kurman" linguistically, we can see that this is arisen from the word "Kuman" which is a commanly known ancient Kipchak Turkish dialect. Look at the ancient Codex Cumanicus and you will understand what i mean.
wiki Codex_Cumanicus
The root of this situation lies beneath the fact that the dynasty of the Selcukid state(11th-13th centuries) spoke an official state language that was a mix of Turkish, Persian and Arabic. This mix transformed in the following centuries into new dialects(eventually into seperate languages) like Kurmanci and Zazaki that were used by Kurdish populations.
Actually the Kurdish autonomous region of Iraq was the most prosperous and peaceful in the region, till ISIS came. Kurds proved that they can run their own country in a good order.
You want brothers? Give Kurd their freedom and later you can ask them if they want to be your brothers and sisters.Stop dreaming about Othoman Empire anymore. It is not going to happen. You better pray that ISIS revolution won't spread into Turkey and destroys your country like in Syria. I'm sure many Sunnis in Turkey would love that.
You are wrong, the modern Kurdish populations live in a way which was done in the medieval times were the tribe leaders were rich, and the majority of the populations were poor and suffered all the time and had no money at all and were slaves of the feudal tribe leaders. This is no way to achieve freedom or democracy. And we must aknowledge that the modern Kurdish feudal tribe leaders like Barzani are all slaves of the US, and are only making theirselves more rich, and have no intentions in making their populations richer!
And also, Ayn Al-Arab(Kobani) is not even a city, and has a population close to 45,000. Even with the support of the US army Delta Forces, the PKK/PYD and the US could not defend such a little place. And the PKK is not representing the Kurdish populations, the PKK is a puppet of the CIA, and is full with US intellengence agents, US soldiers, and Armenians that are not Muslims. Tell me something, how is such a weak terrorist group that cannot even defend a little place with 45,000 population, supposed to manage an imaginery second Israel(that is camouflaged with the name "Kurdistan")? Also, the El Kaide and ISIS are again another terrorist organizations that are created and still being used by the US. Why was it not a problem for the US when the ISIS was killing and massacring innocent people in Syria in order to defeat Esad to achieve the goals of the US, and became a problem when getting out of control of the US CIA? You must admit that the US has lost the puppet war in Syria and that the puppet battle of Ayn Al-Arab between the US and Turkish armed formes was the decisive final move in the Syrian War that ended with the victory of the Turkish Armed Formes, and know that the terrorist monsters that the US created will not hesitate to become puppets of other forces in the Middle East in exchange for money. As a conclusion, the US has no power anymore and cant reach any goals in the Middle East, the US is the biggest terrorist state in the world. China is dominating the world economy, and Russia is becoming more independent in the past couple of years, and the US economy is becoming more and more poor and is doomed to loose and cant do anything anymore in the Middle East.