After several Balkan samples in the Danubian paper plotting south of Bulgaria_IA. I was sure that old Macedonians were just Mycenaeans but slightly more northern shifted.
this is something that Borza and Cohen have been stating since the 1990's
They also said the Doric invasion did not go to macedonian lands and so kept these "myceaneans" more pure to their origin
They state the Dorians came via ship ( logicall ) from modern Epirus and Albanian lands, conquering all Greece and all the islands including Crete and Rhodes
Why would Dorians take ships from Epirus and Albania to reach Greece?
The ones who came by ships and landed to South Albania and Epirus according to Albanian archaeologist Frano Prendi were the Urnfielders who according to him didn't left much legacy on the identity of latter Illyrians but in the surroundings. During Bronze to Iron Age transition burial rite in Greece changed to cremation in urns like Athenian burial rite etc, etc.
Would be interesting to know who were these people, because during this time Mycenae was put in fire and their civilization collapsed followed by Dark Ages and then we got the formation of Iron Age and Classical Greeks.
Southern Italians can be modelled in such a way, yes, but I don't believe it's accurate. The additional Natufian admixture in them points towards assimilation of a population that wasn't like the Minoans/Mycenaeans who both lacked that component in excess of their Neolithic Anatolian. We know that Greek city-states in Magna Graecia were quite large, and the interconnected nature of the Hellenic world at that time means it's quite likely the region absorbed Greek immigrants from across the entire Eastern Mediterranean. This of course would include mainland Greece, but also places like the Aegean islands, Cyprus, Asia Minor, Egypt and coastal Syria. Naturally, the genetics of Southern Italy would have been quite cosmopolitan as a result, and probably more akin to modern Greek island populations than Mycenaeans by the time the Romans conquered and assimilated them.
View attachment 13210
Why would Dorians take ships from Epirus and Albania to reach Greece?
The ones who came by ships and landed to South Albania and Epirus according to Albanian archaeologist Frano Prendi were the Urnfielders who according to him didn't left much legacy on the identity of latter Illyrians but in the surroundings. During Bronze to Iron Age transition burial rite in Greece changed to cremation in urns like Athenian burial rite etc, etc.
Would be interesting to know who were these people, because during this time Mycenae was put in fire and their civilization collapsed followed by Dark Ages and then we got the formation of Iron Age and Classical Greeks.
Why would Dorians take ships from Epirus and Albania to reach Greece?
The ones who came by ships and landed to South Albania and Epirus according to Albanian archaeologist Frano Prendi were the Urnfielders who according to him didn't left much legacy on the identity of latter Illyrians but in the surroundings. During Bronze to Iron Age transition burial rite in Greece changed to cremation in urns like Athenian burial rite etc, etc.
Would be interesting to know who were these people, because during this time Mycenae was put in fire and their civilization collapsed followed by Dark Ages and then we got the formation of Iron Age and Classical Greeks.
Genetics works just fine when it comes to Slavic admixture.
The only possible explanation is that the Mycenaean civilization was overthrown by an identical population and that there might another reason for the Bronze Age Collapse. Aegean Islands (including the Ionic one who were "Mycenaean-like" and supposedly different from Dorians) were a part of Mycenaean civilization and did in fact experience the Greek Dark Ages and massive cultural collapse just like Peloponnese did. I don't see E-V13 or high Doric steppe there from the hypothesized late Bronze Age migrations.
Let me add this to your overall correct statement. There was one archaic Macedonian sample, a female with blue eyes and brown hair. So from 9 (minus the 1 mesolithic sample) 2 samples had blue eyes.
![]()
Anyway, anyone who is familiar with Ancient Greek primary sources would expect nothing but that Ancient Greeks were majority dark-haired and dark-eyed Mediterranean people. However, in this study, the Greeks aside from one outlier that had intermediate to dark complexion, were all pale or pale to intermediate. In contrast in the "Aegean palatial civilizations" paper, the BA Greeks were predicted as being very dark which took us all by surprise.
The post Iron Age Greeks do not completely overlap with Mycenaeans. The Myceneans actually formed their own cluster. Some of the spesimens are closer to Sicilians and some Greek islanders. And I believe that the modern Greeks in this chart are the ones previously used for the Lazaridis' Mycenaean paper. They are from Thessalonika. For good measure, the modern Greeks would plot starting from the T of Thessaloniki to just a little bit below the text Doliani. The post Bronze Age Greeks also seem to be pulled a little bit more to the near East.
The post Iron Age Greeks do not completely overlap with Mycenaeans. The Myceneans actually formed their own cluster. Some of the spesimens are closer to Sicilians and some Greek islanders. And I believe that the modern Greeks in this chart are the ones previously used for the Lazaridis' Mycenaean paper. They are from Thessalonika. For good measure, the modern Greeks would plot starting from the T of Thessaloniki to just a little bit below the text Doliani. The post Bronze Age Greeks also seem to be pulled a little bit more to the near East.
I think so too...
Even if they are not the focus, I don't understand how can you release a paper about Greeks through the ages and have only people from Thessaloniki as representatives of the modern era. Are they still the only properly sampled samples available ?
It's like releasing a paper on French population history and having people from Normandy as the sole representatives of the modern era... They are part of the genetic variation, sure, but it leaves a lot to be desired.
Curious about the two “Agios Giorgios?” results and wonder if they are samples from the same location but different eras, plotting far away from each other.
You know these guys seem to eat an extraordinary amount of meat and animal products, and a surprisingly low amount of fruits and vegetables.
Where's the Spartan on the PCA so speculation can be cut by 90%
This thread has been viewed 40637 times.