MOESAN
Elite member
- Messages
- 5,893
- Reaction score
- 1,296
- Points
- 113
- Location
- Brittany
- Ethnic group
- more celtic
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1b - L21/S145*
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H3c
An old believing was that the Human brain will be evolving regularly towards larger dimensions, so his skull.
Nevertheless, without real measures it's true, I think I observe - since say three generations - decreasing dimensions of skull level (at least at the horizontal level: length+breadth) among new generations, spite stature is still encreasing. BTW, this skeleton evolution, very often attributed to better diet so health, is more marked among high social classes spite the lower classes are today very better fed. It seems to me, as I said already before, that this evolution is tied to less physical activity in young age, maybe less oxygenation too, and lead to higer statures so vertical increase, but NOT to broader dimensions. Not at all a gain in robusticity or health, maybe? By physical ectivity, I don't meanby force hard work which can be bad...
Nevertheless, without real measures it's true, I think I observe - since say three generations - decreasing dimensions of skull level (at least at the horizontal level: length+breadth) among new generations, spite stature is still encreasing. BTW, this skeleton evolution, very often attributed to better diet so health, is more marked among high social classes spite the lower classes are today very better fed. It seems to me, as I said already before, that this evolution is tied to less physical activity in young age, maybe less oxygenation too, and lead to higer statures so vertical increase, but NOT to broader dimensions. Not at all a gain in robusticity or health, maybe? By physical ectivity, I don't meanby force hard work which can be bad...