Construction Why building with stone is more sustainable and long lasting than concrete

Maciamo

Veteran member
Admin
Messages
10,319
Reaction score
3,781
Points
113
Location
Lothier
Ethnic group
Italo-celto-germanic
Concrete, and more specifically reinforced concrete, has allowed humans to build huge structures, like bridges, tunnels and skyscrapers, which have revolutionised the urban landscape since the mid-20th century. But concrete has been overused. Cities have been defaced by ugly concrete buildings from the 1950s, 60s, and 70s in particular.

Another problem with concrete is that it starts to deteriorate after 50 years so that buildings and infrastructures often have to be demolished and replaced.

Another issue is that concrete is extremely carbon intensive to produce and usually goes hand in hand with steel which also generates huge amount of greenhouse gas emissions.

In contrast stone buildings last pretty much forever and cause much less emissions to build. Even when stone buildings are destroyed, the stones can be reused easily — unlike concrete.

Stone constructions also offer a better insulation than concrete. What's more stones are extremely abundant on Earth, so we are never going to run out of raw material.

This video explains why we should start to build with stone again.


This second video explains all the drawbacks of concrete buildings.

 
Last edited:
yeah, but building with stone is much harder and slower process, guy in video forgets to mention that churches from stone were build over a long time, sometimes it took more then century
I think bricks is happy medium, however, just like stone, its pretty no-go for big and high buildings because of time constraint and complexity
 
yeah, but building with stone is much harder and slower process, guy in video forgets to mention that churches from stone were build over a long time, sometimes it took more then century
I think bricks is happy medium, however, just like stone, its pretty no-go for big and high buildings because of time constraint and complexity
High modern buildings, above say 30 metres or so, are usually pretty ugly as a rule.

Many European cityscapes are marred by these shapeless or badly shaped high-rise buildings towering over the older, more locally traditional, buildings..
 
High modern buildings, above say 30 metres or so, are usually pretty ugly as a rule.

Many European cityscapes are marred by these shapeless or badly shaped high-rise buildings towering over the older, more locally traditional, buildings..
I agree
 
Back
Top