Sorry,
Y-G2a is maybe neolithic (it would need some more precise SNP), surely of geographic anatolian-caucasic origin - 'Turc' is a very "wide" ethnic name, as 'Semitic', and irrelevant for a lot of 'G2' bearers...
SO don't be sorry ...
and speaking about male 'line' tracing back to far past centuries is somehow aventurous.
"Adventuresome"? Howso, Sir?
I have a certified copy of the nobiliary grant of arms and title of "cavalry commander" (in modern terms) in my hands, fellow. In the early Renaissance my lineage had faded somewhat, and its rank was contested; the Holy Roman Emperor himself intervened and "ratified" the surname and family network's as basically, after the Conquest, "middle-nobility baronage" and ancient in origin.
Do I sound like a dolt bereft of erudition to you? I know my own root-stock.
Above, my words carry possible overtones of "racism"--let me declare I am fanatically anti-racist, based on ELITIST principle, outraged socialistic humanity... Ha, there you go...
As Dante rightly asserted, nobility is virtue; and inherited nobility is dead unless the "title-deeds" of virtue of the the originally ennobled individual are kept in mind as the meritorious quintessence of nobility. I have no downtrodden socialistic heartburn over my Italo-Nordic ancestor who vindicated the place of Sicily in European Christendom in just war against alien presence.
G2a being Anatolian, Hither-Asiatic is simply moronic. G2, is prominent among the lordly Indo-Aryan and Iranian stata; and G seems, along with R and I, to be the proto-Indo-Iranian/European haplogroups, upon research. Even the Merovingian dynasty carried my blood! G2 as "foreign" "Hither-Asiatic", quasi-Ethiopian-type, is ridiculous.
Are the traces of G2 in the Jewry and Palestinians perhaps indicative of ancient Indo-European Persian or Hittite-type lineal ingression? Hebrews openly confess how ethnically mixed they are--an Indo-European assimilation of nearby "Indo-Hittite" ethnic substance is worth considering in this context...
The Scytho-Sarmatian, Sauromatian and Alanic tribes seem the more probable generative ethnic groups--G2 is the most mysterious male genetic group by far, from my preliminary studies--all these related Paleocaucasian tribal entities explicitly "ARYAN"/Iranian/Iranic, ethnoculturally. The very same tribes introducing horse-battle tactics, mounted horse-archery, the very idea of "knighthood" to their Celtic-Germanic cousins in the West; soldiery of Iranian ancestry commandeered to Hadrian's Wall, the NUMERI EQUITUM SARMATARUM, is possibly interwoven in the Arthurian Grail mythos and thus to G2 "speculative history"...
If I am Turkish, then all Europe is Turkish! Where did the ancient Norse chiefs attribute their origins, the original Latins of Rome, etc.? "The TROJANS," they declared, esoterically. Troy is in TURKEY; Homeric Troy is known as one of the settled, nuclei of paleo-Indo-European/Indo-Iranian culture (whose origins appear ultimately, probably semi-Arctic and Siberian, the Greek "Hyperboreans"), and the Vikings claimed descent from scattered Trojan remnants. Search: Tiras...
BTW, every Western European ethnic group is traceable to paleo-Iranian Eurasian origins (with Basque-like exceptions of complex enigmas). The precise missing link overlooked by historians? Try researching the "GETAE", "THYSSAGETAE", and "MASSAGETAE" and "SAKA" of Asia...Indo-Iranian/Aryan folk who suddenly magically became "Western Germanic", "Gothic" and "Saxon" without further explanation...