Recent content by binx

It's something about all the northern and central Italians, not just the Tuscans.

Do you think that the people in Piedmont after the fall of Rome were like the people of today? In the Collegno cemetery none of the "Italians" were similar to the northern Italians of today.

Maciamo's Dodecad K12 averages.

You're right.

With Imperial Age samples modern Tuscans need even more than 20% northern European. There will surely be some Germanic DNA in the Tuscans but we cannot rule out that the imperial samples are not very representative and there was some resurgence of Etruscan DNA.

Using Maciamo's averages

Not claiming this modelling is valid.

Using the averages you've posted.

Folks on Anthrogenica are biased. It was very obvious that among the Etruscans was common R1b.

Interestingly as expected the dominant haplo among Etruscans was R1b (a lot of U152 and L2) followed by G2a and J2b. How many I2-M223s and H2s?

Could you post the images in one of these sites and then publish them in the forum? http://www.tinypic.com/ http://www.imageshack.us/ https://imgur.com/

Attachments are not working, and what should those attachments prove? I don't understand.

I doubt that Iranian ancestry at the cautious mode is listed as North-Central Italy related ancestry, it's just a coincidence.

Low credibility

That map is obsolete, according to your argument all Europeans are mostly related to Ancient Middle-Easterner people, the ENF component is anywhere in Europe (Romania 52%, Bulgaria 52%, Norway 36%, Scotland 38%, England 40%...).