I voted for the last option, "I am completely open to criticism from abroad and also criticize my own country a lot." I am a bit underread in politics and economy, so I am always willing to listen if it is truth and not an ignorant remark. Just because it is my government I will not be more tolerant of any laxity in the administration, public offices, the parliament, or the justice system. I guess I can be a bit wary of certain "criticisms" with a hidden agenda. If an argument means only to point out the shortcomings, I consider that good and even necessary. Nevertheless I will be highly beligerent towards dishonest attacks for the purpose of diffusing an argument in vilolation of sound logical practice. I can defend any agenda, and criticise any, for the sole purpose of logic, (and perhaps truth if lucky,) for logic rules, (while truth evades,) yay, (oh) !