sparkey
Great Adventurer
- Messages
- 2,250
- Reaction score
- 352
- Points
- 0
- Location
- California
- Ethnic group
- 3/4 Colonial American, 1/8 Cornish, 1/8 Welsh
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- I2c1 PF3892+ (Swiss)
- mtDNA haplogroup
- U4a (Cornish)
Thanks, I'll use the "total" numbers. Scaling out I2, I have:
R1a: 34%
R1b: 28%
N: 25%
I1: 13%
Maybe I shouldn't do this, but I2 hasn't been so large in any sample group until now. I2 isn't that helpful unless we divide it into I2-M223 and I2a-Din, and then the percentages drop. I think that the I2a-Din is mainly indicative of Polish input anyway, rather than Old Prussian input, so a future calculation with better samples groups may have to try to take 3 source populations into account. N still seems to be the main indicator of Old Prussian input.
Anyway, we get:
Per R1a: 30%
Per R1b: 55%
Per N: 62%
Per I1: 48%
Average: 49%
Adjusted average: 48%
About the same, but less noisy.
R1a: 34%
R1b: 28%
N: 25%
I1: 13%
Maybe I shouldn't do this, but I2 hasn't been so large in any sample group until now. I2 isn't that helpful unless we divide it into I2-M223 and I2a-Din, and then the percentages drop. I think that the I2a-Din is mainly indicative of Polish input anyway, rather than Old Prussian input, so a future calculation with better samples groups may have to try to take 3 source populations into account. N still seems to be the main indicator of Old Prussian input.
Anyway, we get:
Per R1a: 30%
Per R1b: 55%
Per N: 62%
Per I1: 48%
Average: 49%
Adjusted average: 48%
About the same, but less noisy.