Grubbe
Regular Member
- Messages
- 137
- Reaction score
- 13
- Points
- 0
- Ethnic group
- Norwegian
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1a Z284
- mtDNA haplogroup
- H5a1k
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So if 17% of Denisovan comes from Neanderthal admixture and another 4% or so comes from "yet another, more ancient human- 'something unknown'" (quoting linked source)-- I think we can officially do away with Darwin's tree of evolution. It seems more like we've emerged from a thicket of genetic material rather than some structure that has defined branches.
This find touches on another of my favorite topics which is hybrid theory (producing vigor in the offspring).
Nice find Grubbe.
It comes from Svante Paabo (and Montgomery Slatkin from Berkeley) so you know it has to be on point. Paabo is about as thorough as a human can get in his methods and research.
So if 17% of Denisovan comes from Neanderthal admixture and another 4% or so comes from "yet another, more ancient human- 'something unknown'" (quoting linked source)-- I think we can officially do away with Darwin's tree of evolution. It seems more like we've emerged from a thicket of genetic material rather than some structure that has defined branches.
This find touches on another of my favorite topics which is hybrid theory (producing vigor in the offspring).
i read it,
Fantastic,
can you believe that have the DNA of a missing link of human evolution history, without having the archaiological evidence of his existance,
I think it is too far,
it is like the theories of big bang or black holes,
we can prove something with maths, but we have not seen it if existed,
so we have DNA of a human that we have never found him and maybe never existed? !!!!!!
something how old????? and from where???
This thread has been viewed 5799 times.