Alan
Elite member
- Messages
- 2,522
- Reaction score
- 456
- Points
- 83
- Ethnic group
- Kurdish
- Y-DNA haplogroup
- R1a1a1
- mtDNA haplogroup
- HV2a1 +G13708A
Please do not respond to any of my posts again. Saying that 'Cimmerian' is 'obviously' an extinct Iranic branch is pseudoscience. Saying that the 'Cimmerians' could have been Thracian or Iranian can be considered speculative science but it's irrelevant. Cimmerian prehistory especially is semi-mythical. Also, I have to note that you didn't use any arguments again.
I can respond to whatever comment I like lol. If you don't want people to respond to you than don't post/comment at all. Thats basically like saying "Hey I will provide my assumption/claims as facts but dare you to dispute it" Kim Jong style.
Labelling R1a-Z93 'Indo-Iranian' is based on a series of presuppositions and I don't accept it.
It doesn't matter much to me what you think about this, but no one with a tiny bit of knowledge would dispute the Indo_Iranian-ness of Z93 from 1500 BC downward.
All you did was dispute other peoples comments underlined by sources but I have yet to see anything from your side. Disputing is easy but giving reasoning for your own claims isn't right?