Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I found this in Gedmatch, can you believe in this?
^^
Woow
Do you think the soldier could come from the south west of Iberia?
I also have a 15 with the Egyptian mummy JK2911
It had to be turdetano descendant of the old tartessos and these in turn would go back to The Argar.
EDITED:
Dear friend Carlos.
It seems that the Roman soldier was really Iberian. See these two posts extracted from BLOG linked below:
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2018/03/first-real-foray-into-migration-period.html?m=1
POST 1:
---Germany_Roman:FN_2
[1] "1. CLOSEST SINGLE ITEM DISTANCE”
Spanish_Baleares / Spanish_Cataluna
2.403037 / 2.657032
Spanish_Murcia / Spanish_Cantabria
2.766374 / 2.908718
Spanish_Andalucia / Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha
2.940393 / 3.080841
Hungary_BA / Spanish_Aragon
3.084510 / 3.128334
POST 2:
The Roman soldier was probably from Aquitaine in South France/North Spain. He clusters with modern Basque & south French.
Individual_ID | Genotype_ID | Other_ID | Source | Date | Population_Label | Location | Country | Latitude | Longitude | Sex | Coverage | Autosomal_SNPs | mtDNA | Y-chromosome |
I9006 | I9006 | Salamis31 | 1240K | 1411-1262 cal BCE (3067 ± 25 BP, DEM-2905) | Mycenaean | Agia Kyriaki, Salamis | Greece | 37.97 | 23.50 | F | 1.387 | 361193 | X2d | |
ID | Population | PBlueEye | PIntermediateEye | PBrownEye | PBlondHair | PBrownHair | PRedHair | PBlackHair | PLightHair | PDarkHair | Hair Color | Eye Clor |
I9006 | Mycenaean | 0.0 (0.0) | 1.1 (0.4) | 98.9 (0.4) | 8.7 (4.9) | 59.9 (6.4) | 1.8 (2.9) | 29.6 (11.8) | 25.7 (16.5) | 74.3 (16.5) | Brown | Brown |
And these gladiators were a group of brothers or relatives or came from the same area ...?
I could find that they were taller than the natives and muscular but why they buried them with their heads next to their bodies. I have not found more information.
Intuitively, some of these comparative results look so weird. I mean, less similarity with Minoans from the BA Aegean (18) than with Paleolithic Ust' Ishim, who barely contributed anything to the modern European population? Ust'Ishim looks much closer than Mal'ta (3), which is demonstrably connected to the ANE that does exist in most modern Europeans via the steppe ancestry. There are other strange results like that. Or are each of these groups (e.g. Paleolithic before glaciation, Northwestern Europe, etc.) to be judged on their own, that is, their results would not be comparable with those included in another group, only with those under the same label?
This thread has been viewed 52394 times.