Eurogenes Similarity rate with different ancient genomes

[Carlos]

Publica tu tasa de similitud con diferentes genomas antiguos.

 

[Duarte]

I found this in Gedmatch, can you believe in this?

Mine

1)300 AD - Germany (Roman Soldier) FN2 80
2)1,800 BC - Hungary (Maros) - Rise373 72
3)1,200 BC - Hungary - BR2 66
4)3,000 BC - Ireland - Ballinahatty 66
5)500 AD - Bavaria - NW 54 65
6)3,220 BC - Germany - Esperdstedt 63
7)3,000 BC - Sweden - Gokhem2 62
8)1,500 BC - Portugal - Torre Vehla 32032 62
9)1,500 BC - Portugal - Monte Gato 62
10)1,800 BC - Hungary (Maros) - Rise374 61
11)1,500 BC - Portugal - Torre Vehla 3831 60

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/17PI_1i-2BkZo0Wr_IWCI1DPUsilwnrbA?usp=sharing

WOOHOO. I am 80% similar to a Roman soldier who invaded the ancient germania. Save the Empire. Save the Emperor. Save Caesar. LMAO.

Hugs Carlos

 

[Carlos]

^^
Woow

Do you think the soldier could come from the south west of Iberia?

I also have a 15 with the Egyptian mummy JK2911

 

[Duarte]

^^
Woow

Do you think the soldier could come from the south west of Iberia?

I also have a 15 with the Egyptian mummy JK2911

^^
We're almost at the same level in ancient Egypt. I have 14 of this same JK2911 mummy.
I liked the idea of being a Roman soldier from the south-west of Iberia and who invaded the center of Europe. LOL.

 

[Carlos]

It had to be turdetano descendant of the old tartessos and these in turn would go back to The Argar.

 

[Duarte]

It had to be turdetano descendant of the old tartessos and these in turn would go back to The Argar.

Dear friend Carlos.

It seems that the Roman soldier was really Iberian. See these two posts extracted from BLOG linked below:
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2018/03/first-real-foray-into-migration-period.html?m=1

POST 1:
---Germany_Roman:FN_2

[1] "1. CLOSEST SINGLE ITEM DISTANCE”
Spanish_Baleares / Spanish_Cataluna
2.403037 / 2.657032
Spanish_Murcia / Spanish_Cantabria
2.766374 / 2.908718
Spanish_Andalucia / Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha
2.940393 / 3.080841
Hungary_BA / Spanish_Aragon
3.084510 / 3.128334

POST 2:
The Roman soldier was probably from Aquitaine in South France/North Spain. He clusters with modern Basque & south French.

 

[Salento]

(From “Gladiator”)

Spaniard Roman General in .... ( ͡~ ͜ʖ ͡°)
(cool dog too)

EDITED:

 

[Carlos]

^^
The video is not available. The video is not available. It says: It is blocked in your country by copyright.

Video is not available
This video includes content from Universal Pictures (ZEFR), which has blocked it in your country for copyright reasons.

 

[Carlos]

Dear friend Carlos.

It seems that the Roman soldier was really Iberian. See these two posts extracted from BLOG linked below:
http://eurogenes.blogspot.com/2018/03/first-real-foray-into-migration-period.html?m=1

POST 1:
---Germany_Roman:FN_2

[1] "1. CLOSEST SINGLE ITEM DISTANCE”
Spanish_Baleares / Spanish_Cataluna
2.403037 / 2.657032
Spanish_Murcia / Spanish_Cantabria
2.766374 / 2.908718
Spanish_Andalucia / Spanish_Castilla_La_Mancha
2.940393 / 3.080841
Hungary_BA / Spanish_Aragon
3.084510 / 3.128334

POST 2:
The Roman soldier was probably from Aquitaine in South France/North Spain. He clusters with modern Basque & south French.

Different places of Spain from North to South. The only one who could collect something like that would be Tartessos (Turdetania) where you know there were people from the north of Iberia, I think.

So the similarity in this case may be from my mother's side.

 

[Carlos]

Is this?

 

[Salento]

Yes ...

 

[Pan]

500 AD - Bavaria - STR 310: 71
300 AD - Ostrogoth KE1: 66
500 AD - Bavaria - NW 54: 66
1,200 BC - Hungary - BR2: 64
500 AD - Bavaria - STR 300: 64
1,300 BC - Mycenaean - I9006: 63


"From the individuals of intermediate skull size, one female (STR_310) exhibited the same southern European ancestry profile found in most other females with clear skull deformation"

"Some females with ACD could be argued to demonstrate grave assemblages associated with an eastern context (STR_328, AEH_1), but others were not specific (NW_54)"

"The only exceptions to this general pattern of northern/central European ancestry were the two women, STR_300 and STR_502, which were of a more southern ancestry associated with present day Greece and Turkey, respectively"

-- Veeramah et al., "Population genomic analysis of elongated skulls reveals extensive female-biased immigration in Early Medieval Bavaria", in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115(13):201719880, March 2018


"Our two Bronze Age samples, BR1 (1,980–2,190 cal BC) and BR2 (1,110–1,270 cal BC) fall among modern Central European genotypes. [...] These two Bronze Age genomes represent the oldest genomic data sampled to date with clear Central European affinities."

-- Gamba et al., "Genome flux and stasis in a five millennium transect of European prehistory", Nature Communications volume 5, Article number: 5257 (2014)


[TABLE="width: 970"]
[TR]
[TD]Individual_ID[/TD]
[TD]Genotype_ID[/TD]
[TD]Other_ID[/TD]
[TD]Source[/TD]
[TD]Date[/TD]
[TD]Population_Label[/TD]
[TD]Location[/TD]
[TD]Country[/TD]
[TD]Latitude[/TD]
[TD]Longitude[/TD]
[TD]Sex[/TD]
[TD]Coverage[/TD]
[TD]Autosomal_SNPs[/TD]
[TD]mtDNA[/TD]
[TD]Y-chromosome[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]I9006[/TD]
[TD]I9006[/TD]
[TD]Salamis31[/TD]
[TD]1240K[/TD]
[TD]1411-1262 cal BCE (3067 ± 25 BP, DEM-2905)[/TD]
[TD]Mycenaean[/TD]
[TD]Agia Kyriaki, Salamis[/TD]
[TD]Greece[/TD]
[TD]37.97[/TD]
[TD]23.50[/TD]
[TD]F[/TD]
[TD]1.387[/TD]
[TD]361193[/TD]
[TD]X2d[/TD]
[TD][/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[TR]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]
[TABLE="width: 842"]
[TR]
[TD]ID[/TD]
[TD]Population[/TD]
[TD]PBlueEye[/TD]
[TD]PIntermediateEye[/TD]
[TD]PBrownEye[/TD]
[TD]PBlondHair[/TD]
[TD]PBrownHair[/TD]
[TD]PRedHair[/TD]
[TD]PBlackHair[/TD]
[TD]PLightHair[/TD]
[TD]PDarkHair[/TD]
[TD]Hair Color[/TD]
[TD]Eye Clor[/TD]
[/TR]
[TR]
[TD]I9006[/TD]
[TD]Mycenaean[/TD]
[TD]0.0 (0.0)[/TD]
[TD]1.1 (0.4)[/TD]
[TD]98.9 (0.4)[/TD]
[TD]8.7 (4.9)[/TD]
[TD]59.9 (6.4)[/TD]
[TD]1.8 (2.9)[/TD]
[TD]29.6 (11.8)[/TD]
[TD]25.7 (16.5)[/TD]
[TD]74.3 (16.5)[/TD]
[TD]Brown[/TD]
[TD]Brown[/TD]
[/TR]
[/TABLE]

-- Lazaridis et al., "Genetic origins of the Minoans and Mycenaeans", Nature. 2017 Aug 10; 548(7666): 214–218.

 

[Carlos]

And these gladiators were a group of brothers or relatives or came from the same area ...?


I could find that they were taller than the natives and muscular but why they buried them with their heads next to their bodies. I have not found more information.

 

[Salento]

And these gladiators were a group of brothers or relatives or came from the same area ...?


I could find that they were taller than the natives and muscular but why they buried them with their heads next to their bodies. I have not found more information.

I heard about them, most of the Gladiators were more like Northern Europeans types, some from Britain, and one Middle Easterner or North African. (I Think.)

 

[davef]

I'm quite the charming fellow...100 percent similarity to Lady Cheddarly

 

[Carlos]

^^

Soon I will open a thread in honor of Lady Cheddarly for having been the progenitor of this new system in which through free reconstructions using different digital media you can get to know other aspects about the qualities of those beings who lived thousands of years ago and that science could never solve. Maybe the Lady Cheddarly method is not infallible but it's the only thing we have.

 

[Ygorcs]

Intuitively, some of these comparative results look so weird. I mean, less similarity with Minoans from the BA Aegean (18) than with Paleolithic Ust' Ishim, who barely contributed anything to the modern European population? Ust'Ishim looks much closer than Mal'ta (3), which is demonstrably connected to the ANE that does exist in most modern Europeans via the steppe ancestry. There are other strange results like that. Or are each of these groups (e.g. Paleolithic before glaciation, Northwestern Europe, etc.) to be judged on their own, that is, their results would not be comparable with those included in another group, only with those under the same label?

 

[Angela]

Intuitively, some of these comparative results look so weird. I mean, less similarity with Minoans from the BA Aegean (18) than with Paleolithic Ust' Ishim, who barely contributed anything to the modern European population? Ust'Ishim looks much closer than Mal'ta (3), which is demonstrably connected to the ANE that does exist in most modern Europeans via the steppe ancestry. There are other strange results like that. Or are each of these groups (e.g. Paleolithic before glaciation, Northwestern Europe, etc.) to be judged on their own, that is, their results would not be comparable with those included in another group, only with those under the same label?

You're right. It doesn't make sense.

 

[leperrine]

 

[Duarte]

In case of portuguese and catalanes the match with hungary (maros) - rise 373 (mt_hg K1a2a) make some sense.


The biggest match of Portuguese people (at least, is what I could see) is with 1,800 BC - Hungary (Maros) - Rise373.


Maciamo Hay explain that "the vast majority of Neolithic samples from Central and Western Europe were K1a, including subclades such as K1a1b1 (Spain), K1a2a (Catalonia and Portugal), K1a3a3 (Hungary), K1a4a1 (Catalonia and Germany), and K1a5 (Sweden)".


See in:


https://www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_K_mtDNA.shtml